Abstract
The production of meaningful gestures has been claimed to enhance lexical access. However, the possibility that meaningless movements also improve retrieval has been largely ignored despite evidence that all types of movements increase with dysfluency. To examine this issue, we conducted two experiments to determine whether movements in general would improve lexical access in a tip–of–thetongue (TOT) paradigm. TOT states were induced by presenting definitions of rare words that participants were then asked to recall. Participants who were required to tap at their own pace while retrieving words obtained significantly higher resolution rates than those who were immobile. Thus, movement does not have to be semantically related to the lexical item in order to aid in retrieval. However, tapping did not improve lexical access in all retrieval tasks. In a lexical retrieval task that relied more on executive abilities (letter fluency), participants who tapped retrieved fewer words than those who were immobile. The fact that movement enhanced lexical access only when retrieval depended on the automatic spread of activation suggests that facilitation may occur because of the activation of neural areas common to both speech and movement.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beattie, G., &Coughlan, J. (1999). An experimental investigation of the role of iconic gestures in lexical access using the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon.British Journal of Psychology,90, 35–56.
Brown, R., &McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 325–337.
Bull, P., &Connelly, G. (1985). Body movement and emphasis in speech.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,9, 169–187.
Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., &Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults?Journal of Memory & Language,30, 542–579.
Butterworth, B., &Beattie, G. (1978). Gesture and silence as indicators of planning in speech. In R. N. Campbell & P. T. Smith (Eds.),Recent advances in the psychology of language 4: Formal and experimental approaches (pp. 347–360). London: Plenum.
Chang, P., &Hammond, G. R. (1987). Mutual interactions between speech and finger movements.Journal of Motor Behavior,19, 265–274.
Dittmann, A. T., &Llewellyn, L. G. (1969). Body movement and speech rhythm in social conversation.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,11, 98–106.
Duffy, J. R. (1995).Motor speech disorders. St. Louis: Mosby.
Fiez, J.A., &Raichle, M.E. (1997). Linguistic processing. In J. Schmahmann (Ed.),The cerebellum and cognition (pp. 233–254). New York: Academic Press.
Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., &Smith, A. (1992). Evidence of common timing processes in the control of manual, orofacial, and speech movements.Journal of Motor Behavior,24, 281–287.
Frick-Horbury, D., &Guttentag, R. E. (1998). The effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall.American Journal of Psychology,111, 43–62.
Graham, J. A., &Heywood, S. (1975). The effects of elimination of hand gestures and of verbal codability on speech performance.European Journal of Psychology,5, 189–195.
Hadar, U., Steiner, T. J., Grant, E. C., &Rose, F. C. (1983). Head movement correlates of juncture and stress at sentence level.Language & Speech,26, 117–129.
Jones, G. V. (1989). Back to Woodworth: Role of interlopers in the tipof-the-tongue phenomenon.Memory & Cognition,17, 69–76.
Kikyo, H., Ohki, K., &Sekihara, K. (2001). Temporal characterization of memory retrieval processes: An fMRI study of the “tip of the tongue” phenomenon.European Journal of Neuroscience,14, 887–892.
Klapp, S. T. (1981). Temporal compatibility in dual motor tasks II: Simultaneous articulation and hand movements.Memory & Cognition,9, 398–401.
Krauss, R. M., &Hadar, U. (2000). The role of speech-related arm/hand gestures in word retrieval. In L. S. Messing & R. Campbell (Eds.),Gesture, speech, and sign (pp. 93–116). New York: Oxford University Press.
MacKay, D. G., &Burke, D. M. (1990). Cognition and aging: New learning and the use of old connections. In T. M. Hess (Ed.),Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 213–263). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Milner, B. (1964). Some effects of frontal lobectomy in man. In J. Warren & K. Akert (Eds.),The frontal granular cortex in behavior (pp. 313–334). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Moscovitch, M. (1994). Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex.Neuropsychology,8, 524–534.
Ragsdale, J. D., &Silvia, C. F. (1982). Distribution of kinesic hesitation phenomena in spontaneous speech.Language & Speech,25, 185–190.
Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., &Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production.Psychological Science,7, 226–230.
Ravizza, S.M. (2001). Relating selective brain damage to impairments with voicing contrasts.Brain & Language,77, 95–118.
Rime, B., Schiaratura, L., Hupet, M., &Ghysselinckx, A. (1984). Effects of relative immobilization on the speaker’s nonverbal behavior and on the dialogue imagery level.Motivation & Emotion,8, 311–325.
Schwartz, B. L. (2001). The relation of tip-of-the-tongue states and retrieval time.Memory & Cognition,29, 117–126.
Schwartz, B. L., &Smith, S. M. (1997). The retrieval of related information influences tip-of-the-tongue states.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 68–86.
Schwartz, B. L., Travis, D. M., Castro, A. M., &Smith, S. M. (2000). The phenomenology of real and illusory tip-of-the-tongue states.Memory & Cognition,28, 18–27.
Smith, S. M., Brown, J. M., &Balfour, S. P. (1991). TOTimals: A controlled experimental method for studying tip-of-the-tongue states.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 445–447.
Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., &Winocur, G. (1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults.Neuropsychology,11, 138–146.
Tuller, B., Kelso, J. A. S., &Harris, K. S. (1982). Interarticulator phasing as an index of temporal regularity in speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 460–472.
Widner, R. L., Jr.,Smith, S. M., &Graziano, W. G. (1996). The effects of demand characteristics on the reporting of tip-of-the-tongue and feeling-of-knowing states.American Journal of Psychology,109, 525–538.
Yaniv, I., &Meyer, D. E. (1987). Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 187–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grants NS 30256 and NS 17778 from the National Institute of Health. The research formed part of the author’s PhD dissertation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravizza, S. Movement and lexical access: Do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 610–615 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196522
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196522