Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of relative immobilization on the speaker's nonverbal behavior and on the dialogue imagery level

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People generally display an important amount of gestural and motoric activity when speaking. Since recent data have shown the limits of an explanation of this activity in terms of nonverbal or bodily communication, the present study attempted to explore what would happen if subjects were impeded from making the principal movements they normally perform during a conversation. Subjects were led to hold a 50-minute conversation while sitting in an armchair devised to restrain their movements of the head, arms, hands, legs, and feet during part of the experiment. The main dependent variables consisted of nonverbal activity in body zones that remained free to vary: eyebrows, eyes, mouth, and fingers. During the phase of movement restriction, highly significant increases in activity were recorded in these zones, with subsequent return to base levels when the subject recovered free movements. Also, significant interactions of conditions of movements and subject's conversational role (speaker vs. listener) were observed for most of the variables. Samples of dialogues submitted to a computerized technique of content analysis revealed a significant decrease in the vividness of imagery during movement restriction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976).Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Electromyograms as measures of extent and affectivity information processing.American Psychologist, 36 441–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman-Eisler, F. (1961a). A comparative study of two hesitation phenomena.Language and Speech, 4 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman-Eisler, F. (1961b). The distribution of pause duration in speech.Language and Speech, 4 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogenraad, R., & Orianne, E. (1981). Valence d'imagerie de 1130 noms de la langue française.Psychologica Belgica, 21 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J. (1979). A bio-informational theory of emotional imagery.Psychophysiology, 16 495–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C. (1978–1979). The night journey: Trends in the content of narrative symbolizing alterations of consciousness.Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 4 321–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. (1957). Motivational dynamics of language behavior. In M. R. Jones (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. (1982a). Sensibilité des comportements non verbaux aux variations de la densité de communication.L' Année Psychologique, 82 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. (1982b). The elimination of visible behavior from social interactions: Effects on verbal, nonverbal and interpersonal variables.European Journal of Social Psychology, 12 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. (1983). Nonverbal communication or nonverbal behavior? Towards a cognitive-motor theory of nonverbal behavior. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.),Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 84 963–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982).Affect and cognition: The hard interface. Unpublished manuscript.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rimé, B., Schiaratura, L., Hupet, M. et al. Effects of relative immobilization on the speaker's nonverbal behavior and on the dialogue imagery level. Motiv Emot 8, 311–325 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991870

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991870

Keywords

Navigation