Skip to main content
Log in

Cost Effectiveness of Trastuzumab in the Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

A Lifetime Model

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent randomised trials have demonstrated a statistically significant effect of trastuzumab on disease-free survival when used as adjuvant therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 protein (HER2)-positive resectable early stage breast cancer, with a treatment course lasting either 9 or 52 weeks. However, the cost effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab with respect to mortality remains uncertain, especially in an Australian setting.

Objective

To estimate the cost effectiveness of trastuzumab in Australia, in a cohort of 50-year-old patients with HER2-positive breast cancer over a lifetime, using (i) disease-free survival and cardiotoxicity data from recent randomised trials; (ii) information on long-term survival of patients with treated primary breast cancer; and (iii) costs of treating local and distant relapses and disease from causes other than breast cancer.

Methods

A Markov model consisting of four health states (remission, loco-regional recurrence, metastatic disease and death) was developed. Transition probabilities corresponded to patterns of relapse and metastases seen in recent trials. The model was run until age 100 years to allow calculation of average survival. Outcome measures were life-years and QALYs (calculated using utility weights reported in the literature).

The model was calibrated to reflect literature evidence that the risk of breast cancer recurrence following primary treatment diminishes progressively to zero after about 20 years. It was assumed that the morbidity benefit of trastuzumab observed in trials would be present for 5 years but would then diminish progressively to zero after 8 years. Costs (year 2005 values) and benefits were discounted at 3% per annum.

Results

For every 1000 patients treated with a 52-week course of trastuzumab, there were 136 fewer breast cancer deaths (relative risk reduction 28%). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were Australian dollars ($A)13 730 per year of life saved (YOLS) and $A22 793 per QALY. The net incremental cost was $A56.3 million ($A414 012/cancer death avoided). Cost effectiveness declined (ICER = $A27 734/QALY) in older patients (age 65 years at treatment initiation).

The ICER was driven mainly by the drug acquisition costs, the assumption of the duration of benefit and the discount rate. Cost offsets from reduced costs of treating recurrent or metastatic breast cancer during follow-up were present but these factors were of less importance according to sensitivity analyses. The 9-week treatment schedule approached economic dominance (ICER = $A1700/QALY) because of decreased costs, improved relative risk for prevention of metastases and more cancer deaths avoided (196).

Conclusion

The results suggest that trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer may be cost effective when given over either 52 or 9 weeks at current acquisition costs in Australia. However, the overall budget impact of the 52-week course is significant, and the 9-week course appears economically attractive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Table I
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Table II
Table III

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Genentech. Herceptin prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://www.gene.com/gene/products/information/oncology/herceptin/insert.jsp [Accessed 2007 Mar 15]

  2. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. New Engl J Med 2005; 353 (16): 1659–1672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. New Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1673–1684

    Google Scholar 

  4. Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N, et al. Phase III randomised trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel with docorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab with docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab in HER2 positive early breast cancer patients: BCIRG006 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 94 Suppl. 1: S5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joensuu H, Kelloumpu-Lehtinen P-K, Bono P, et al. Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. New Engl J Med 2006; 354: 809–820

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garrison LP, Perez EA, Dueck A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting for treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract 6023]. 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (18s Pt 1; June 20 Suppl.)

  7. Wilson E, Cronin J, Ballot J, et al. Estimating the real cost of adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with Her2+ early stage breast cancer [abstract 6081]. 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (18s Pt 1; June 20 Suppl.)

  8. Neyt M, Albrecht J, Cocquyt V. An economic evaluation of Herceptin® in adjuvant setting: the Breast Cancer International Research Group 006 Trial. Ann Oncology 2006; 17: 381–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wapnir IL, Anderson SJ, Mamounas EP, et al. Prognosis after ipselateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2028–2037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Life tables, Australia, 2003 to 2005. Canberra: ABS, 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs0.nsf/DetailsPage/33 02.0.55.0012003%20to%202005?.OpenDocument [Accessed 2007 Mar 15]

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aebi S, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber J, et al. Is chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer? Lancet 2000; 355: 1869–1874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kroman N, Jensen M-B, Wohlfahrt J, et al. Factors influencing the effect of age on prognosis in breast cancer: population-based study. BMJ 2000; 320: 474–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. New Engl J Med 2001; 344: 783–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brenner H, Hakulinen T. Are patients diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 years ever cured? J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 432–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Moliterni A, et al. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up. New Eng J Med 1995; 332: 901–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nab HW, Hop WCJ, Crommelin MA, et al. Changes in long-term prognosis for breast cancer in a Dutch cancer registry. BMJ 1994; 309: 83–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marubini E. When patients with breast cancer can be considered to be cured [letter]. BMJ 1994; 309: 954–955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rivkin S, Green S, Lew D, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisolone compared with single-agent L-phenylalanine mustard for patients with operable breast carcinoma and positive axillary lymph nodes. Cancer 2003; 97: 21–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Green S. Do estimates of long-term survival tell us whether patients diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 years are ever cured? J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 392–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Norum J, Risberg T, Olsen JA. A monoclonal antibody against HER-2 (trastuzumab) for metastatic breast cancer: a model-based analysis. Annals Oncol 2005; 16: 909–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing. Pharmaceutical benefits schedule. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.pbs.gov.au/html/home [Accessed 2007 Mar 15]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing. Medicare benefits schedule. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/Me dicare+Benefits+Schedule-2 [Accessed 2007 Mar 15]

    Google Scholar 

  23. Earle CC, Chapman RH, Baker CS, et al. Systematic overview of cost-utility assessments in oncology. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3302–3317

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenberg PAC, Hortobagyi GN, Smith TL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2197–2205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, et al. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER2/neu oncogene. Science 1987; 235: 177–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinstein MC, Stason WB. Hypertension: a policy perspective. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  27. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Australasian Association of Cancer Registries & NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre. Breast cancer in Australian women 1982–1996. Canberra: AIHW (Cancer Series), 1999 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/4520 [Accessed 2007 Mar 1]

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guarneri V, Lenihan DJ, Valero V, et al. Long-term cardiac tolerability of trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was undertaken following an independent application to the Western Australian Drug Evaluation Panel (WADEP) for formulary listing of adjuvant trastuzumab (Herceptin®) in WA public hospitals. Both authors are members of WADEP. At the time of preparation, J.A. Millar was a member of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), Canberra, which received an application for Commonwealth of Australia subsidy for Herceptin® in an adjuvant setting during the preparation of this paper.

The sponsor of trastuzumab in Australia (Roche Products Pty Ltd) had no input to this paper.

J.A. Millar has no connection with Roche Products Ltd. M.J. Millward has participated in advisory boards for other anti-cancer pharmaceuticals manufactured by Roche Pharmaceuticals and participated in clinical trials sponsored by Roche Pharmaceuticals.

All data used in the preparation of this paper are in the public domain.

We thank Dr Arlene Chan (Medical Oncologist, Royal Perth Hospital) and Dr Frank Sanfilippo (Research Fellow, School of Population Health, University of Western Australia) for helpful suggestions during manuscript preparation.

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Barbara Denise Millar, who died of metastatic ovarian cancer, aged 53 years, during its preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Alasdair Millar.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Millar, J.A., Millward, M.J. Cost Effectiveness of Trastuzumab in the Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. Pharmacoeconomics 25, 429–442 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200725050-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200725050-00006

Keywords

Navigation