Skip to main content
Log in

Durability performance of self-compacting concrete (SCC) with binary and ternary mixes of fly ash and limestone filler

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The basic objective of this work is to evaluate the durability of self-compacting concrete (SCC) produced in binary and ternary mixes using fly ash (FA) and limestone filler (LF) as partial replacement of cement. The main characteristics that set SCC apart from conventional concrete (fundamentally its fresh state behaviour) essentially depend on the greater or lesser content of various constituents, namely: greater mortar volume (more ultrafine material in the form of cement and mineral additions); proper control of the maximum size of the coarse aggregate; use of admixtures such as superplasticizers. Significant amounts of mineral additions are thus incorporated to partially replace cement, in order to improve the workability of the concrete. These mineral additions necessarily affect the concrete’s microstructure and its durability. Therefore, notwithstanding the many well-documented and acknowledged advantages of SCC, a better understanding its behaviour is still required, in particular when its composition includes significant amounts of mineral additions. An ambitious working plan was devised: first, the SCC’s microstructure was studied and characterized and afterwards the main transport and degradation mechanisms of the SCC produced were studied and characterized by means of SEM image analysis, chloride migration, electrical resistivity, and carbonation tests. It was then possible to draw conclusions about the SCC’s durability. The properties studied are strongly affected by the type and content of the additions. Also, the use of ternary mixes proved to be extremely favourable, confirming the expected beneficial effect of the synergy between LF and FA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silva PR, de Brito J (2015) Experimental study of the porosity and microstructure of self-compacting concrete (SCC) with binary and ternary mixes of fly ash and limestone filler. Constr Build Mater 86:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Poppe AM, Schutter G (2005) Cement hydration in the presence of high filler contents. Cem Concr Res 35(12):2290–2299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouasker M, Mounanga P, Turcry P, Loukili A, Khelidj A (2008) Chemical shrinkage of cement pastes and mortars at very early age: effect of limestone filler and granular inclusions. Cem Concr Compos 30(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Uysal M, Yilmaz K (2011) Effect of mineral admixtures on properties of self-compacting concrete. Cem Concr Compos 33(7):771–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khayat KH, Kamal H, Assaad J, Daczko J (2004) Comparison of field-oriented test methods to assess dynamic stability of self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater J 101(2):168–172

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taha MMR, Grahn R, Hays J, Reinhart AK (2011) Examining short and long term properties of self-consolidating concrete (SCC). Report No. NM09MSC-02. University of New Mexico, Department of Civil Engineering, sponsored by New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) Research Bureau, Albuquerque

  7. Lothenbach B, Scrivener K, Hooton RD (2011) Supplementary cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res 41:1244–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neville AM (1995) Properties of concrete, 4th edn. Pearson, England. ISBN 978-0-582-23070-5

    Google Scholar 

  9. RILEM Report 7 (1991) Fly ash in concrete, properties and performance. In: Wesche K (ed) Report of technical committee 67-FAB use of fly ash in building. RILEM Publications, Bagneux. ISBN: 0-203-62641-9

  10. De Weerdt K, Kjellsen KO, Sellevold EJ, Justnes H (2011) Synergy between fly ash and limestone powder in ternary cements. Cem Concr Compos 33(1):30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. NP EN 197-1, A3 (2008) Cement, part 1: composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. IPQ, Lisbon

  12. NP EN 450-1, A1 (2008) Fly ash for concrete, part 1: definition, specifications and conformity criteria. IPQ, Lisbon

  13. NP EN 450-2 (2006) Fly ash for concrete, part 2: conformity evaluation. IPQ, Lisbon

  14. LNEC E 466 (2005) Limestone fillers for hydraulic binders. National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Lisbon

  15. NP EN 12620 (2010) Aggregates for concrete. IPQ, Lisbon

  16. NP EN 934-1 (2008) Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout, part 1: common requirements. IPQ, Lisbon

  17. NP EN 934-2 (2009) Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout, part 2: concrete admixtures, definitions, requirements, conformity, marking and labelling. IPQ, Lisbon

  18. NP EN 1008 (2003) Mixing water for concrete, specification for sampling, testing and assessing the suitability of water, including water recovered from processes in the concrete industry, as mixing water for concrete. IPQ, Lisbon

  19. NP EN 206-9, Concrete (2010) Part 9: additional rules for self-compacting concrete (SCC). IPQ, Lisbon

  20. Nepomuceno M, Oliveira L (2008) Parameters for self-compacting concrete mortar phase. ACI Mater J SP253-21:323–340

  21. Silva P, de Brito J, Costa J (2011) Viability of two new mix design methodologies for SCC. ACI Mater J 108(6):579–588

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beaudoin JJ, Marchand J (2001) Pore structure, chap 14. In: Ramachandran VS, Beaudouin JJ (eds) Handbook of analytical techniques in concrete science and technology. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, pp 528–628. ISBN 0-8155-1437-9

  23. NT Build 492 (1999) Concrete, mortar and cement-based repair materials: chloride migration coefficient from non-steady-state migration experiments. Nordtest, Espoo

  24. LNEC E 463 (2004) Concrete, Determination of diffusion coefficient of chlorides from nom-steady-state migration test. National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Lisbon

  25. Luping T, Nilsson L, Basheer PA (2012) Resistance of concrete to chloride ingress testing and modelling. CRC Press, Taylor Francis Group, U.S., Boca Raton. ISBN: 978-0-203-88241-2

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luping T (2005) Guidelines for practical use of methods for testing the resistance of concrete to chloride ingress, EU-Project CHLORTEST (EU funded research Project under 5FP GROWTH programme). SP Swedish National, Testing and Research Institute, Boras

    Google Scholar 

  27. DURAR (2000) Thematic network XV.B durability of rebars. Manual for inspecting, evaluating and diagnosing corrosion in reinforced concrete structures. CYTED, Ibero-American Program Science and Technology for Development, Subprogram XV, Corrosion/Environmental Impact on Materials. ISBN: 980-296-541-3

  28. Polder R (2000) Test methods for on-site measurement of resistivity of concrete, RILEM TC 154-EMC: electrochemical techniques for measuring metallic corrosion. Mater Struct 33:603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. LNEC E 391 (1993) Concrete, Determination of carbonation resistance. National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Lisbon

  30. CPC-18 (1988) Measurement of hardened concrete carbonation depth. RILEM recommendation. Mater Struct 21(6):435–455

  31. Silva PR, de Brito J (2013) Evaluation of porosity in self-compacting concrete (SCC) produced with fly ash (FA) and limestone filler (LF). In: Roussel N, Bessaies-Bey H (eds) Rheology and processing of construction materials – 7th RILEM international conference on self-compacting concrete and 1st RILEM international conference on rheology and processing of construction materials (RILEM PRO 90), 2013, pp 293–300

  32. Diamond S (1999) Aspects of concrete porosity revisited. Cem Concr Res 29(8):1181–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Diamond S (2004) The microstructure of cement paste and concrete: a visual primer. Cem Concr Compos 26(8):919–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu W, Bartos PJM (2003) Permeation properties of self-compacting concrete. Cem Concr Res 33(6):921–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Audenaert K, Boel V, Schutter G (2005) Chloride penetration in self-compacting concrete by cyclic immersion. In: Proceedings of SCC2005, China, May 2005, RILEM PRO 42, pp 355–362

  36. LNEC E 464 (2007) Concrete, prescriptive methodology for a design working life of 50 and of 100 years under the environmental exposure (in Portuguese). National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Lisbon

  37. NP EN 206-1 (2007) Concrete, part 1: specification, performance, production and conformity (in Portuguese). IPQ, Lisbon

  38. Silva PR, de Brito J (2013) Experimental study on chloride migration coefficients of SCC with binary and ternary mixtures of fly ash and limestone filler. In: UKIERI Concrete Congress: Innovations in Concrete Construction, Jalandhar (Punjab), India. National Institute of Technology, Engineering College, 5–8 March 2013, pp 905–918

  39. Dinakar P, Babu KG, Santhanam M (2008) Durability properties of high volume fly ash self-compacting concretes. Cem Concr Compos 30(10):880–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sengul O, Gjørv OE (2008) Electrical resistivity measurements for quality control during concrete construction. ACI Mater J 105(6):541–547

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hornbostel K, Larsen CK, Geiker MR (2013) Relationship between concrete resistivity and corrosion rate—a literature review. Cem Concr Compos 39:60–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Newlands MD, Jones MR, Kandasami S, Harrison TA (2008) Sensitivity of electrode contact solutions and contact pressure in assessing electrical resistivity of concrete. Mater Struct 41(4):621–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramezanianpour A, Ghiasvand E, Nickseresht I, Mahdikhani M, Moodi F (2009) Influence of various amounts of limestone powder on performance of Portland limestone cement concretes. Cem Concr Compos 31(10):715–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gesoğlu M, Güneyisi E, Özbay E (2009) Properties of self-compacting concretes made with binary, ternary, and quaternary cementitious blends of fly ash, blast furnace slag, and silica fume. Constr Build Mater 23(5):1847–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Smith KM, Schokker AJ, Tikalsky PJ (2004) Performance of supplementary cementitious materials in concrete resistivity and corrosion monitoring evaluations. ACI Mater J 101(5):385–390

    Google Scholar 

  46. CEB Comité Euro-International du Béton (1992) Durable concrete structures, 2nd edn. CEB Design Guide, Edition Thomas Telford, London. ISBN: 978-0-7277-3549-2

  47. Duracrete (2000) General guidelines for durability design and redesign. Final Technical Report. The European Union—Brite EuRam III, Probabilistic performance based durability design of concrete structures, document B 95-1347/R15

  48. Bertolini L, Elesener B, Pedeferri P, Polder R (2004) Corrosion of steel in concrete, prevention, diagnosis, repair. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. ISBN 3-527-30800-8

    Google Scholar 

  49. Siddique R (2011) Properties of self-compacting concrete containing class F fly ash. Mater Des 32(3):1501–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge de Brito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, P.R., de Brito, J. Durability performance of self-compacting concrete (SCC) with binary and ternary mixes of fly ash and limestone filler. Mater Struct 49, 2749–2766 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0683-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0683-6

Keywords

Navigation