Introduction

Polyneuropathy is a common disorder with heterogenic clinical presentation and many different etiologies. Neurophysiological examination plays an important role in defining the presence of a polyneuropathy and in terms of delineating the underlying pathophysiological process (i.e., primary axonal loss vs primary demyelination) (Mygland 2007).

Aim of the work

The aims of the work are the following: to evaluate the clinical usefulness of conduction slowing and CMAP or SNAP amplitude reduction in the differentiation between axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathies and to correlate the neurophysiological results with the clinical findings in all patients.

Patients and methods

One hundred and twenty-five patients with symptoms and signs of polyneuropathy, 78 males (62.4%) and 47 females (37.6%), were studied ranging in age from 9 to 79 years (44.75 ± 17.66). Patients were questioned for sensory, motor, and autonomic symptoms. A clinical history and full neurological examination were obtained and incorporated when necessary from the patient’s file, as well as all laboratory investigations. The patients were classified according to criteria proposed by the ESTEEM group (Tankisi et al. 2005).

Control group

The control group included 30 healthy asymptomatic individuals, 19 males (63.3%) and 11 females (36.7%), with no history of diabetes or other systemic diseases with mean age 39.07 ± 9.42. They showed normal neurological examination.

Methods

All electrophysiological studies were performed using Nihon Kochden electromyography machine with surface recording and stimulating electrodes. Nerve conduction studies were carried out at 33 °C room temperature (Agarwal et al. 2008). Sensory studies were performed in all patients and controls using surface electrodes for stimulation and recording for median, ulnar, and sural nerves. Motor studies were performed in all patients and controls using surface electrodes for stimulation and recording. CMAPs were recorded with surface electrodes on the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle for the median nerve, abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle for the ulnar nerve, extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) muscle for the peroneal nerve, and abductor hallucis (AH) muscle for the tibial nerve (Weiss et al. 2004).

Electromyography (EMG)

Standard needle electromyography (EMG) was performed using sterile concentric needle electrodes. For spontaneous activity assessments are the following: analysis of the duration and amplitude and incidence of polyphasic potentials (> 4 phases) of motor unit action potentials (Brown and Bolton 1993).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the present study was conducted using the mean, standard error, correlation analysis, and chi-square. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19 for Windows.

Results

The study included one hundred and twenty-five cases of polyneuropathy, 78 males (62.4%) and 47 females (37.6%), who were classified according to the criteria proposed by the ESTEEM group (Tankisi et al. 2005). The mean age of the subjects was 44.75 ± 17.66 years. Cases were divided into 36 patients with axonal polyneuropathy, 23 patients with demyelinating polyneuropathy, and 9 patients with mixed polyneuropathy, while 57 patients were classified as neuropathic (Table 1). Clinical findings in patients with axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathies are shown in Table 2. The number of analyzed nerve segments with the total number of examined segments and the number of absent responses are indicated in parentheses (Table 3). There is statistically significant linear correlation between reduction in SNAP amplitude and decrease in sensory CV of median and ulnar nerves while no significant correlation was found between reduction in SNAP amplitude and sensory CV of sural nerve in both axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy (Table 4). There is statistically significant inverse correlation between reduction in CMAP amplitude and increase in DML of median, ulnar, and tibial nerves in both axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy, while in peroneal nerve, significant inverse correlation was found in axonal but not in demyelinating polyneuropathy (Table 5). There is statistically significant linear correlation between reduction in CMAP amplitude and decrease in motor CV of median, ulnar, peroneal, and tibial nerves in axonal polyneuropathy while in demyelinating polyneuropathy, significant linear correlation was found in median, ulnar, and tibial nerves but not in peroneal nerve (Table 6). There is no significant correlation between distal motor latency and grade of power (MRC grade) in median, ulnar, and peroneal nerves while in tibial nerve in demyelinating polyneuropathy, statistically significant inverse correlation was found between prolongation of distal motor latency and decrease of grade of power (Table 7). There is statistically significant linear correlation between reduction in CMAP amplitude and decreased grade of power (MRC grade) in median, ulnar, peroneal, and tibial nerves in both axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy (Table 8). There is no significant correlation between conduction velocity and grade of power (MRC grade) in median, peroneal, and tibial nerves while in ulnar nerve in demyelinating polyneuropathy, statistically significant linear correlation was found between decrease in conduction velocity and decrease in grade of power (Table 9).

Table 1 Etiology of cases with axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathies
Table 2 Clinical findings in patients with axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathies
Table 3 Analyzed nerve conduction studies
Table 4 The correlation between reduction in SNAP amplitude and decrease in CV of sensory nerves in axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy
Table 5 The correlation between reduction in CMAP amplitude and increase in distal motor latency of motor nerves in axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy
Table 6 The correlation between reduction in CMAP amplitude and decrease in conduction velocity of motor nerves in axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy
Table 7 Correlations between distal motor latency in each tested nerve and the strength of their muscular counterparts (MRC grade) in axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy
Table 8 Correlations between compound muscle action potential amplitude in each tested nerve and the strength of their muscular counterparts (MRC grade) in axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy
Table 9 Correlations between conduction velocity in each tested nerve and the strength of their muscular counterparts (MRC grade) in axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy

Discussion

The results in the present study showed a linear correlation between amplitude reduction and conduction slowing in the majority of motor nerves and also sensory nerves in both groups of axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy.

Axonal polyneuropathies

The findings in the present study confirm the results of the study presented by Tankisi et al. (2007) who found the SNAP amplitude reduction to be linearly correlated with decrease in sensory CV in axonal polyneuropathy. The correlation in motor nerves for axonal polyneuropathy in the present study confirmed the mentioned study compared nerve conduction measures in axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathies.

Demyelinating polyneuropathies

In the study presented here, a linear correlation between reductions in sensory nerve action potential amplitude and decrease in sensory conduction velocity was found in most nerves in patients with demyelinating polyneuropathies. These findings are going with that of Krarup and Trojaborg (1996) who reported slowing of sensory conduction in association with markedly decreased SNAP amplitude in patients with chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy. These findings also confirm the study by Tankisi et al. (2007) who found the slowing of sensory conduction to be linearly correlated with reduction in SNAP amplitude in patients with demyelinating polyneuropathies of different etiologies. In motor nerves, the linear correlation between CMAP amplitude reduction and conduction slowing found in the present study was in agreement with the findings in the aforementioned studies by Krarup and Trojaborg (1996) and Tankisi et al. (2007), while Wilson and colleagues did not find CMAP amplitude and motor CV to be correlated in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) (Wilson et al. 1998). Correlating the degree of weakness with nerve conduction parameters in the present study aimed at assessment of electro-clinical correlations in an attempt to find the potential parameters that could represent adequate biomarkers of disease activity. The results showed significant linear correlation between reduction in CMAP amplitude of median, ulnar, peroneal, and tibial nerves and decreased grade of power (MRC grade) in their muscular counterparts in both axonal as well as demyelinating polyneuropathy, whereas prolongation of DML correlated with decrease of grade of power only in tibial nerve and conduction velocity correlated with grade of power only in ulnar nerve in demyelinating polyneuropathy. These findings support earlier studies that found the degree of weakness to be only consistently correlated with CMAP amplitudes in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy by Rajaballya and Narasimhan (2011), multifocal motor neuropathy by Feasby et al. (1985), and in demyelinating Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease by Kim et al. (2012). The results of the present study as regards the relationship between muscle weakness and decreased distal CMAP amplitude and the presence of needle electromyographic findings compatible with axonal loss in demyelinating polyneuropathy, in addition to previous studies, indicate that pathogenic mechanisms leading to axonal degeneration may play an important role in the outcome of the neurological deficit in patients with demyelinating neuropathies.

Summary and conclusions

The present study demonstrates significant correlation between amplitude reduction and conduction slowing in demyelinating as well as axonal polyneuropathy, and therefore, this correlation does not seem to be useful in revealing the primary pathophysiology of a polyneuropathy in the clinical routine at present. Decrease in CV, increase in DML, increase in F-wave latency, conduction block, and temporal dispersion should mainly be considered. Analysis of EMG findings in the present study showed no difference between axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathies as regards spontaneous activity assessment, interference pattern analysis, or motor unit action potential analysis indicating that in the differentiation of axonal and demyelinating pathologies, the value of needle EMG may be limited. The degree of muscle weakness was found to be only consistently correlated with CMAP amplitudes but not with DML or CV suggesting that CMAP amplitude can be used as a clinically relevant biomarker of disease activity in both axonal as well as demyelinating polyneuropathy. The relationship between muscle weakness and decreased CMAP amplitude and the presence of needle electromyographic findings compatible with axonal loss in demyelinating polyneuropathy indicate that secondary axonal degeneration may play an important role in the outcome in patients with demyelinating neuropathies.