Abstract
Background
Scrotoschisis is a rare congenital anomaly of the scrotal wall with idiopathic etiology and unknown prevalence. This pathology is extremely rare. We report a new case and review the literature for relevant data.
Case presentation
A 3-day-old full-term baby boy of African ethnicity, who had a homebirth, with birth weight of 2.7 kg presented to our emergency department with exteriorization of left testis; after clinical examination and proper investigations the diagnosis was scrotoschisis. Surgical treatment was performed by primary closure with excellent follow-up. We reviewed the literature to elaborate on the etiology of this pathology and its management.
Conclusions
Scrotoschisis is a rare congenital anomaly affecting healthy babies. Early management is substantial. Further studies are recommended to learn more about the etiology and long-term results, including the effect on the fertility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background
Scrotoschisis is a rare congenital anomaly of the scrotal wall with idiopathic etiology and unknown prevalence. This pathology is extremely rare. In this anomaly, the testis eviscerates through an opening high on the anterior wall of the scrotum [1]. The exact birth prevalence of scrotoschisis is unknown. We report the 17th case in the literature. In this case report, we highlighted etiology hypotheses and management considerations.
Case presentation
A 3-day full-term baby boy of African ethnicity presented to our emergency department with exteriorization of left testis from his left hemi-scrotum. He was born at home at 41 weeks of gestational age by normal vaginal delivery: birth weight. 2.7 kg, birth length of 44 cm, and head circumference of 46 cm. His 27-year-old mother, primigravida, is a farmer without a particular past or medical history: there is no family history of the same pathology and no history of consanguinity. An examination revealed no relevant findings for his other organs. There was neither antenatal nor ultrasonography follow-up. A physical examination was remarkable for left scrotal anterior wall defect of 1.5 × 2 cm with normal aspect of inguino-genital region. His left testis was exteriorized within its coverage of tunica vaginalis, mildly edematous with a thin fine exudative inflammatory membrane but with normal vascular appearance. All blood analyses and urine examinations were within normal range. Broad-spectrum antibiotics (ceftriaxone) were started on his arrival at our emergency unit. Under general anesthesia, surgical debridement and scrotal defect exploration showed complete left scrotoschisis with free and mobile extracorporeal testis, no calcified masses, and no meconium residua (Fig. 1). Orchidopexy and primary skin closure was performed horizontally in two layers with vicryl 4-0. There were good results on follow-up at 1 and 2 months. Testicular ultrasound at 3 months showed two identical testes with normal appearance; there was no follow-up beyond 3 months.
Discussion
Scrotoschisis is a rare congenital scrotal wall pathology. Its prevalence is unknown. Only 16 cases were reported in the literature [2, 3]. It is a semi-urgent condition which should be managed immediately if it presents with a testicular torsion. There are many hypotheses for its etiology: Failure of differentiation of scrotal mesenchyme layer results in rupture or avascular necrosis of overlying epithelium leading to scrotal wall defect [4]. Other reports mentioned external mechanical compression effect due to arthrogryposis [5], as well as meconium periorchitis [6]. In our case, we have no obvious cause; there is no evidence of meconium residua and neither is there evidence of traumatism. Iatrogenic injury is a potential cause and could be concurrently associated if obstetrical difficulties were encountered during labor, mostly if completed by cesarean section [7]. Broad-spectrum antibiotics should be commenced immediately on diagnosis. During a physical examination, it is fundamental to rule out testicular torsion (due to lack of testicular anatomical attachments). A local aseptic dressing procedure is imperative to avoid possible orchitis or peritonitis in case of communicating patent processus vaginalis. A surgical approach depends on the severity and could be a simple dressing with healing by secondary intention [8] or conventional surgical method in two planes horizontally or vertically after orchidopexy. In our case, we preferred to close in two layers horizontally; the skin defect was mainly horizontal. Postoperative follow-up should not be discontinued until verification of two symmetric, vital, and normally growing testes. Further research is recommended to study the effect of scrotoschisis on fertility.
Conclusions
Scrotoschisis is a rare congenital anomaly affecting otherwise healthy babies. Early management is substantial. Further studies are recommended to learn more about the etiology and long-term results, including fertility.
References
Togami J, Radhakrishnan J. Testicular extrusion due to scrotoschisis. Urology. 2002;60(6):1112. http://www.goldjournal.net/article/S0090-4295(02)02003-4/abstract. Accessed 19 Feb 2017.
Mallick AA, Mukhopadhyay NN, Sinha AK. A rare case: testicular exstrophy or scrotoschisis? a report and discussion. Pediatr Surg Int. 2014;31:209–11.
DeRoo SE, Lumpkins KM, El-Metwally DE. Scrotoschisis in a neonate with meconium peritonitis and periorchitis. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2016;9(1):107–12.
Gongaware RD, Sussman AM, Kraebber DM, Michigan S. Scrotoschisis as a mechanism for extracorporeal testicular ectopia. J Pediatr Surg. 1991;26(12):1430–1.
Lais A, Serventi P, Caione P, Ferro F. Arthrogryposis as a possible mechanism of scrotoschisis acquired in utero. Pediatr Surg Int. 1994;9:605–6.
Chun K, St-Vil D. Scrotoschisis associated with contralateral meconium periorchitis. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(6):864–6. http://www.jpedsurg.org/article/S0022-3468(97)90637-0/abstract. Accessed 19 Feb 2017.
Premkumar MH, Colen JS, Roth DR, Fernandes CJ. Could scrotoschisis mimic an iatrogenic injury? a case report. Urology. 2009;73(4):795–6. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/articles/19211136/. Accessed 19 Feb 2017.
Kojori F, DeMaria J. Scrotoschisis associated with meconium periorchitis. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3(5):415–6. http://www.jpurol.com/article/S1477-5131(07)00231-8/abstract. Accessed 19 Feb 2017.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
No data sets were generated or analyzed during this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SS managed the case, collected and evaluated the data; MC assisted in managing the case and did the first draft of manuscript; SG received and critically revised the manuscript and coordinated the submission; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardians for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Sidibe, S., Coulibaly, M. & Ghazwani, S. Scrotoschisis: a case report. J Med Case Reports 11, 259 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1427-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1427-8