Correction to: Trials (2018) 19: 633
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2993-9
Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified that the final specification of randomisation implemented in the study is slightly different to that stated in the protocol and needs to be corrected as follows:
-
Allocation will be stratified by centre and minimised on patient age (≥ 65 or < 65 years), gender, and presence of FBSS or not
Reference
Eldabe, et al. Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. 2018, 2018;19:633. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2993-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Eldabe, S., Gulve, A., Thomson, S. et al. Correction to: Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 20, 610 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3804-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3804-7