We read with interest the recent meta-analysis by Chang et al. who investigated the role of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) use in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and discuss the potential mechanisms involved in the identified improvements due to the use of NMBA in ARDS [1]. They conclude that the use of NMBAs could significantly decrease mortality in moderate-to-severe ARDS patients and decrease the incidence of barotrauma during mechanical ventilation [1]. We would like to make some comments. Firstly, expert opinion challenges the conclusions of Chang et al., suggesting that NMBA use should be limited to the most hypoxemic patients (PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 120 mmHg, based on the subgroup analysis of the ACURASYS study) and not to moderate ARDS [2, 3]. The same authors also recommend that, at the early phase of mild or moderate ARDS, spontaneous breathing should be preserved [3]. Chang et al. note that NMBAs prevent patient-initiated generation of high volumes and active exhalation, facilitate patient-ventilator synchrony, provide protection from ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), and ultimately reduce mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS [1]. The beneficial effects of NMBAs likely include not only abolition of patient-ventilator asynchronies, better lung recruitment, and decrease of VILI, but also less oxygen consumption and possible anti-inflammatory effects [3]. In addition, NMBAs are also reported to directly alleviate pulmonary and systemic inflammatory progression [4]. Other authors demonstrated that cisatracurium infusion in ARDS patients increased the end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure, contributing to the reduction of atelectrauma and expiratory derecruitment [2, 5]. We see that the conclusions of Chang et al. that the use of NMBAs could significantly decrease mortality in moderate-to-severe ARDS patients and decrease the incidence of barotrauma during mechanical ventilation are not the recommendations of the experts focusing upon the most hypoxemic patients. This message seems crucial to us, considering the numerous side effects of NMBAs.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- NMBA:
-
Neuromuscular blocking agent
- ARDS:
-
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
- VILI:
-
Ventilator-induced lung injury
References
Chang W, Sun Q, Peng F, Xie J, Qiu H, Yang Y. Validation of neuromuscular blocking agent use in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Crit Care. 2020;24:54 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2765-2.
Bourenne J, Hraiech S, Rambaud R, Forel JM, Persico N, Guervilly C, Papazian L. Non-ventilatory therapies for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84(9):1093–101. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12328-5 Epub 2018 May 9. Review.
Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, et al. ACURASYS study investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1107–16.
Fanelli V, Morita Y, Cappello P, Ghazarian M, Sugumar B, Delsedime L, et al. Neuromuscular blocking agent cisatracurium attenuates lung injury by inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-α1. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:132–40.
Guervilly C, Bisbal M, Forel JM, Mechati M, Lehingue S, Bourenne J, et al. Effects of neuromuscular blockers on transpulmonary pressures in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:408–18.
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PMH, SR, and DDB designed the paper. All authors participated in drafting and reviewing. The authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare to have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Honore, P.M., Mugisha, A., Kugener, L. et al. The use of a neuromuscular blocking agent could significantly decrease mortality in moderate-to-severe ARDS patients: is moderate ARDS the best indication for neuromuscular blocking agents. Crit Care 24, 217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02947-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02947-x