Findings

Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) caused by Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides (Mmm) is a livestock disease of utmost importance in sub-Saharan Africa. Animals get infected by mycoplasma-containing droplets, leading to acute or subacute disease that may progress into death or chronic malady, although many animals recover. Acute disease is characterized by fever, pleural effusion, severe respiratory distress and a characteristic cough, with a mortality rate of up to 10% in endemic zones [1].

Currently, the control of CBPP in sub-Saharan Africa mainly relies on live vaccines (T1/44 and T1sr) that have their limitations [2]. In the absence of a meaningful small rodent model for Mmm infections, research towards improved vaccines relies on studies involving the native host. The current CBPP infection models are based on intratracheal intubation accessed via the nasal or oral cavity, applied blindly via a flexible rubber tube [3] or guided via an bronchoscope [4]. Inoculums reported were pleural effusions from CBPP-positive cattle [5], which are known to contain high concentrations of mycoplasmas [6] or broth cultures containing up to 1010 mycoplasmas per mL [7]. Alternatively, in contact transmission has been used to infect cattle, which resembles the natural infection best, but requires donor animals and overall large animal numbers. Recently a novel challenge model for contagious caprine pleuropneumonia was developed, combining aerosol-based intranasal infection and intratracheal infection [8]. This work investigated the use of aerosols containing mycoplasmas to establish an easy to use alternative infection model for CBPP.

Six Boran (Bos indicus) heifers (No. 1–6) aged 28–37 months at the time of inoculation, weighing 200–260 kg were enrolled in this study. The sample size was determined based on an expectation of 100% morbidity induced by Mmm Afadé. We calculated an exact 95% confidence interval around the observed 100% (6/6 animals) morbidity, which indicates a lower limit of 55%, hence we are 95% confident that the true morbidity is at least 55%. The animals were sourced from CBPP-free regions in Kenya. The cattle were vaccinated twice against foot and mouth disease (Fotivax™, Kevevapi, Kenya) at 85 and 66 days before infection and dewormed using Levafas Drench (Norbrook®, UK) at 40 days before infection. All animals tested seronegative for CBPP antibodies using cELISA (IDEXX, Montpellier, France) and complement fixation test (CFT) (CIRAD, Montpellier, France). The layout of the challenge is displayed in Fig. 1a. Two weeks prior to the experimental infection, the cattle were transferred to an animal biosafety level two facility (ABSL-2), where they were kept in one room (25 m2) with the ability to move freely and having access to food and water ad libitum. The strain Afadé [9] was cultured as described previously [10], aliquoted and stored at − 80 °C until further use. For the experimental aerosol infection, thawed Mmm cultures (5 mL, 5 × 108 colour changing units/mL) were administered equally to each nostril using an atomizer (MAD Nasal™ Intranasal Mucosal Atomization Device, Teleflex®, USA) connected to a lockable glass syringe on seven consecutive days (0–6 dpi). The droplet size generated by the atomizer ranges from 30 to 100 µm. The aerosol was applied during inhaling, took less than 5 min per animal and did not require sedation. The health status of the cattle was monitored daily in the facility. Rectal temperatures exceeding 39 °C were considered as fever. End point criteria were: signs of moderate to severe pain, > 3 consecutive days of high fever (> 40 °C), lateral recumbency for > 1 day, no feeding for > 4 days, breathing frequency of > 50 breaths per minute for > 3 days. The animals were bled twice weekly by jugular vein puncture. Whole blood was used immediately for haematological analysis while serum samples were stored at − 20 °C until further use. Blood parameters were measured using a MEK-6450 Celltac Alpha (Nihon Kohden, Japan) according to vendors’ protocol. Euthanasia was performed as previously described [3] and all necropsies were performed according to standard procedure [11]. Lung and tracheobronchial as well as mediastinal lymph nodes were collected and immediately fixed in neutral buffered 10% formalin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) at room temperature until further use. The tissues were processed by routine methods and paraffin embedded. Sections of 4 µm were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE) for histopathological evaluation. All protocols of this study were designed and performed in strict accordance with the Kenyan legislation for animal experimentation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cartoon displaying the setup of the in vivo trial. a Six outbred Boran (Bos indicus) heifers were intranasally infected with aerosols of Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides strain Afadé on 7 consecutive days and kept up to 55 days post infection. b The dashed green line displays the numbers of live animals (only heifer 2 reached endpoint criteria 25 days post infection). The orange and blue bars represent the numbers of animals seroconverted after infection according to the complement fixation test and cELISA, respectively

Seroconversion was assessed using the CFT [12] and the cELISA [13]. The assays and the results interpretation were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions and the OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals [14]. Detailed information on the use of these tests is provided in Additional file 1.

Body temperatures above 39 °C, fever were detected in two out of six animals (2 and 6). In 2 the fever peaked between 23 and 25 dpi with temperatures ranging from 40.3 to 40.5 °C, associated with an overall dullness, coughing, extensive nasal discharge and bleeding from the right nostril (endpoint criteria). This animal was euthanized on 25 dpi. Heifer 6 had mild fever (range 39.1–40.2 °C) for eight consecutive days (27–34 dpi), accompanied by four days of extensive coughing and inappetence (28–31 dpi). The animal did however remain with a slight cough throughout the study (in total 36 days). Extended periods of coughing were also observed in heifers 4 and 5, with coughing being recorded for a total of 35 and 22 days, respectively. For heifer 3, cough was only recorded occasionally. The haematological analysis did not reveal any specific findings (data not shown).

At necropsy, pleural fluid appeared normal. All animals, except heifer 1, had multifocal fibrinous adhesions between visceral and parietal pleura. There were multiple small consolidated areas in several lung lobes of four animals (Table 1). In heifer 2, these areas appeared as typical lesions of a fibrinous bronchopneumonia with necrosis and haemorrhage of the lung tissue and oedema of the interlobular septae. In animals 3, 4, and 6, several of these lesions were firm. Histopathologically, lung lesions presented as necrotizing and purulent broncho-interstitial pneumonia. Areas of coagulative necrosis and haemorrhage of bronchi, bronchioles and adjacent alveoli were surrounded by many degenerated neutrophils and few lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages. In animal 2, there was marked oedema and fibrin exudation. The interlobular septae were inflamed and contained multiple fibrin thrombi in lymphatic vessels. Lungs of heifers 3, 4, and 6 showed more progressive and chronic lesions with areas of necrosis and neutrophil infiltration demarcated by prominent, cell rich connective tissue containing large lymphocytic cell aggregates (Table 1, Fig. 2).

Table 1 Summary of clinical and pathological findings
Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative lung lesions and histological findings. a–c Heifer 2 showing lesions typical of fibrinous pneumonia (a). Histologically b, c there is central necrosis (asterisks) of airways and alveoli extending into interlobular septae (arrowheads), which show signs of beginning fibrosis. d, e Heifer 3 showing more progressed lesions of multifocal fibrinous pneumonia. d Histologically there is a thicker zone of inflammatory infiltrate (arrow) surrounding the central necrosis (asterisks) consisting of neutrophils, lymphocytes and macrophages and marked fibrosis affecting the interlobular septae surrounding the affected lobuli (arrowheads)

Seroconversion results obtained with different tests varied, which is expected given the different antibody classes detected. According to the CFT, all heifers seroconverted between 11–24 dpi confirming successful infection of all animals. Maximum titres were observed around 40–50 dpi, afterwards titres decreased. Seroconversion measured by cELISA was observed between 11–39 dpi for 5 out of 6 heifers. All results are summarized in Additional file 1. Figure 1b shows the dynamics of the serological response.

Development of an easy to use and reproducible infection model for CBPP has remained one of the major challenges in CBPP vaccine research for years [2]. The infection model tested here builds on the repeated infection via aerosols and the synchronic inoculation of all animals by a defined mycoplasma dose per animal. In contrast to the excellent aerosol-based Mycoplasma bovis infection model reported recently [15], the model presented here does not require an infection chamber and can be carried out in resource-poor settings. The fact that just one animal reached endpoint criteria is not surprising as mortality rates of CBPP in the field range from 10 to 20%. All animals infected were prime animals originally intended for breeding purposes without any previous disease record. The pathomorphological changes observed in the five heifers are in agreement to previous findings [16] and textbook knowledge [17]. One animal seroconverted but did not show any lesions 54 dpi.

Intubation is technically demanding. It requires the animals to be sedated and the procedure can be done on standing animals or in lateral recumbency. In most published studies, intubation is performed once, even if repeated intubation over three days were reported [18]. Seroconversion happens earlier in intubated than in in-contact infection [19]. This study confirmed a rather overall late seroconversion in the infection model used here compared to intubated animals [3, 10].

In-contact infection resembles the natural way of disease transmission. Drawbacks of the in-contact challenge model are: (i) it requires an extra group of diseased animals as source of infection to be mingled with the animals to be tested, (ii) efficient transmission happened at a ratio of one infected animal per two naïve animals (1:2), (iii) the onset of infection is different as in the natural setting, making it difficult to compare disease outcomes such as clinical signs and lesions. Therefore, this model requires many animals to provide meaningful data, which is very costly and not in line with 3R guidelines. The present study revealed that the repeated intranasal infection with an aerosolized culture of Mmm Afadé caused CBPP. This easy to use experimental infection model avoids an “overchallenge” and will foster pathogenicity, virulence and vaccine studies in the future.