Erratum
The original article [1] contained an error whereby Fig. 2a and b were mistakenly swapped with each other, and thus did not correspond to their correct respective sub-figures. The original article has been updated to include the correct configuration of Fig. 2a and b which can also be viewed ahead.
Different types of online questionnaires. a Embedded answers (gap fill). b matching. c true/false, multiple choice and matching tests
Reference
García-Iglesias MJ, et al. Mixed-method tutoring support improves learning outcomes of veterinary students in basic subjects. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14:35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1330-6.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
García-Iglesias, M.J., Pérez-Martínez, C., Gutiérrez-Martín, C.B. et al. Correction to: Mixed-method tutoring support improves learning outcomes of veterinary students in basic subjects. BMC Vet Res 14, 75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1380-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1380-9