Correction to: BMC Med (2019) 17:105
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1330-9
Figure 3 in the original article [1] is incorrect; labels for secondary outcomes have been shifted and do not correspond to the numbers reported in the table (Additional File 8).
The corrected version can be seen ahead.
This figure should be used over the Fig. 3 seen in the original article.
This error does not affect the results, interpretation, or conclusion.
Forest Plot of the results for primary and secondary outcomes
Reference
Boutron I, Haneef R, Yavchitz A, Baron G, Novack J, Oransky I, et al. Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit. BMC Med. 2019;17:105 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1330-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Boutron, I., Haneef, R., Yavchitz, A. et al. Correction to: Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit. BMC Med 17, 147 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1388-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1388-4