Erratum

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained missing graphics of the path models. This has now been included correctly below.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Path model for the willingness to report to work if required (standardised path coefficients for significant direct effects, p < =0.05)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Path model for the willingness to report to work if asked, but not required (standardised path coefficients for significant direct effects, p < =0.05)