Background

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) affects 5–9 in 106 children younger than 15 years and 1 in 106 older patients. At the origin of the disease lies the clonal proliferation of histiocytes called Langerhans cells. Its symptoms are the result of accumulation of the abnormal cells in tissues and organs. The disease is not associated with increased risk of treatment failure (especially among older children) However, appropriate procedures implemented preemptively can eliminate possible complications and so significantly reduce the risk of deterioration of patients’ quality of life [1,2,3,4,5,6].

Currently, new approaches and procedures allow to identify the patients requiring modification or intensification of treatment. As part of routine diagnostics, the gene profile and targeted therapies are increasingly used in treatment regimens [7,8,9,10,11,12,13].

Unfortunately, the treatment of children with LCH in Poland continues to be limited by financial resources, legal restrictions to introducing new treatment protocols and clinical studies for children, as well as by the lack of national cooperative clinical trials. Owing to the aforementioned reasons, the Polish Children Oncology Group adopted the Histiocyte Society Guidelines for LCH III in 2010. This was the first attempt to unify the management of children with LCH in Poland. In spite of this early effort, none of the Polish oncological centers used randomization at the time. Instead, they determined the treatment arm independently. To our knowledge, there has been no prior clinical assessment of their decision.

Thus, in the present study, we sought to: 1) evaluate the efficacy of the managements adopted by each oncological center on their own, with no inter-center cooperation; 2) assess the outcome of children with LCH treated in Polish pediatric hematology-oncology centers. We believe that the ability to implement complex studies by centers and countries traditionally excluded from large cooperative groups is key to generalize the results of treatment to children with LCH globally.

Methods

Patients

Since 1962, by the decision of the Polish Minister of Health, the care for children with cancer is provided separately from adult oncology. Currently, there is a very well-functioning oncology care system for children and adolescents with 18 centers located in major cities throughout the country.

For the purpose of this study, all Polish child oncology centers were requested, based on national regulations, to provide the following data: demographic data, clinical data, local or systemic treatment data and outcome of the patients treated due to LCH between January 2010 and December 2017. As a result, we were able to retrospectively collect data from 14 out of 18 pediatric oncology centers in Poland. All patients had a histological confirmation of LCH at the time of diagnosis using immunohistochemical method without central verification, which was not implemented until 2018. Patients were assessed as single system disease (SS: defined as one organ or system involved) or as multi system disease (MS: defined as two or more organs or systems involved) [6]. The approval for this retrospective study was obtained from all relevant institutions in compliance with national law and international regulations for protection of Human research subjects.

Statistical methods

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time interval from the date of diagnosis to the date of death or to the date of last follow-up. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as any of the following: the time interval from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression, recurrence, second malignancy, death of any reason or to the date of last follow-up for patients without above events. Results distributions were estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Survival curves in groups were compared using log-rank test and p ≤ 0.05 was regarded as significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.3 for Windows.

Results

Patients characteristic and treatment

One hundred and eighty-two patients with LCH were treated using Histiocyte Society Guidelines [14] during the period between 2010 and 2017. There were 71 (39%) boys and 111 (61%) girls. The majority of children (69%) were classified as single system. Median age at diagnosis was 4.2 years, however, the patients with single system disease (SS) were significantly older as compared to the children with multisystem disease (MS), that is 6 years vs. 2.3 years respectively (p 0.003). The most common site was bones (76% patients with SS). The next most common locations were skin (16%), followed by lymph nodes (3%). Only one patient had isolated CNS involvement. MS disease presented with more than two organs involvement was found in 33 (59%) out of 56 cases [15]. Molecular tests were performed in 26 (14%) of patients. BRAF mutation was found in 11 participants (42%).

Systemic treatment was applied to 112 patients: 47% children with SS disease and 98% with MS disease. One hundred nine children received systemic chemotherapy according to Histiocyte Society Treatment Guidelines adopted by Polish Children Oncology Group [14]. As local therapy, radiotherapy was applied in two cases, and a surgery was performed with or without local steroids in seven patients. The patient clinical and treatment characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient Characteristics

Follow-up and outcome

Six children were lost from the follow-up and three patients were still receiving treatment at the time of data collection. One hundred and seventy-one patients are alive with a median follow-up of 4.3 years from diagnosis (range from 0.1 to 18.1 years). Two children died, one infant prior to receiving treatment and one child due to a progressive disease 6 months post-diagnosis. Fourteen patients relapsed and are alive in second remission. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) in the entire group were 0.99 and 0.91 respectively (Figs. 1 and 2). OS and EFS were significantly better in SS group as compared to MS group, p 0.03 and p 0.008, respectively (Figs. 3 and 4). Among 11 patients with BRAF mutation, one child relapsed and one progressed. The patient who relapsed was treated with second line chemotherapy (cytarabine and vincristine), while the patient who progressed received target therapy with vemurafenib. Both children are alive in complete clinical remission.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curve of OS for the entire study group

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curve of EFS for the entire study group

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curve of OS. Comparison between patients with single system disease vs. patients with multi system disease

Fig. 4
figure 4

Kaplan-Meier curve of EFS for the study group. Comparison between patients with single system disease vs. patients with multi system disease

Discussion

Langerhans cells histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disease with unclear etiology. It may affect different age groups, but is most often observed in the first decade of life [1,2,3,4]. It can affect different organs and systems i.e. bones, skin, lymph nodes, liver, lung, spleen, hematopoietic system, and central nervous system (CNS). The spectrum of clinical manifestations is broad, from single-focus to life-threatening symptoms. Current classification divides LCH into two groups: single system (single organ or system is involved; found in about 55% of patients), and multisystem (involves 2 or more systems / organs; with or without risk organs involvement) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In our study, the single system disease was found in 69% of patients, which may be associated with multisystem underestimation, since the total number of patients was not known (no data from 4 centers). Bones were most involved which is consistent with other reports [2, 4, 6].

The course of LCH can be diverse and often is unpredictable. It oscillates from spontaneous regression, through a long-term period of exacerbation of the disease, to an aggressive form rapidly leading to death. In 2010, Badalian-Very published the study describing the presence of mutations in the BRAFV600E gene in histiocytes in patients with LCH [7]. Nowadays, it seems that the occurrence of mutations in the BRAF gene is usually associated with a more aggressive form of the disease, more frequent resistance to conventional chemotherapy, and with a higher probability of recurrence and progression [1, 6, 10,11,12]. For these reasons, molecular diagnostics is routinely carried out in many countries. In the present study, only 14% of patients underwent molecular tests and we strongly believe, it is necessary to introduce them for routine diagnostics in this group of patients in Poland.

The younger the child, the greater the risk of multisystem disease, and the greater the risk of the unfavorable course of LCH. In addition, the involvement of the risk organs (hematopoietic system, liver, spleen) is associated with a worse prognosis [1,2,3,4, 6]. In our material, both deceased patients had MS disease. What is more, first symptoms occurred before the age of 2 in both cases.

Although, the outcome of Polish patients can generally be considered as good, the need for the implementation of unified diagnostic procedures is clear. These must include molecular tests, treatment and other managements based on LCH guidelines. Furthermore, successful outcomes are dependent on the introduction of individualized aggressive local control measures. Thus, due to the rarity of appearances, a good inter-center cooperation is needed for a more thorough understanding of the nature of the disease, as well as for better treatment results.

Conclusion

The treatment of LCH in Polish centers was effective. However, successful long-term outcomes are dependent on good diagnostic approaches and very judicious use of chemotherapy. Identifying areas for improvement is needed in order to generalize outcomes. The development of national cooperative groups to coordinate and optimize resources, adapt treatment guidelines, and develop centralized centers of excellence is imperative in the advancement of care for children with cancer worldwide.