Background

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) occurs in only 1–3% of patients with infective endocarditis and the most appropriate management is therefore unknown [1, 2].

The possible mechanisms responsible for myocardial ischemia in endocarditis are the presence of preexisting coronary artery disease, coronary emboli from aortic vegetations, obstruction of the coronary ostium due to a large vegetation, severe aortic insufficiency and external coronary artery compression [3,4,5]. The latter is a rare and lethal finding with few reported cases available in the medical literature [3, 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].

We report a case of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) performed during ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the setting of a bioprosthetic aortic root abscess compressing the left main coronary artery. In previous similar reports, a surgical intervention represented the main therapeutic approach [5, 8, 13]. We believe that sharing experiences can be of help in defining a common procedural strategy in such rare conditions.

Case presentation

An 82-year-old woman with a history of atrial fibrillation, chronic renal failure, anemia and a bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement performed in 2014, was admitted to hospital with profound asthenia and a pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO). No coronary lesions were detected at the time of aortic valve replacement. Clinical parameters and laboratory findings on admission are summarized in Table 1. The chest X-ray did not show signs of consolidation. Samples of urine, blood and sputum were sent for microbiological screening. A trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was performed as part of the PUO diagnostic work-up [15] and showed the left ventricle was not dilated with normal global systolic function, moderate mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, normal bioprosthesic function but pronounced aortic root thickening (Fig. 1 and Additional file 1: Video S1). Because of high clinical suspicion of endocarditis, empirical broad spectrum antimicrobial therapy was initiated, followed by targeted treatment (clyndamicin 600 mg three times daily) based upon the results of blood cultures (Staphylococcus aureus). The initial patient response was satisfactory. She became afebrile and the inflammatory markers improved. A conservative strategy was planned. During her first week in hospital she underwent a routine transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and a second TEE was also repeated, 7 days later, with no new findings. Due to the stable clinical conditions, the initial management plan remained unchanged. It was aimed to complete 1 month of antibiotic therapy before performing a new TEE. However, almost 1 month after her admission, a new rise in her inflammatory markers and temperature was observed associated with clinical deterioration. 24 h later the patient developed central chest discomfort and an ECG showed new ST segment elevation in the anterior precordial leads (Fig. 2a and b). Immediate coronary angiography was performed. A severe narrowing, followed by complete occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and a critical, long tubular stenosis of the proximal left circumflex artery (LCx), was detected (Fig. 2c, Additional file 2: Video S2). The interventional cardiologist suspected that there was extrinsic compression of the coronary arteries from the aortic root abscess (Additional file 3: Video S3). The surgical team was involved, however due to the unstable hemodynamic condition (blood pressure: 80/50 mmHg, heart rate-HR: 110 bpm, pO2: 8 kPa in high flow oxygen treatment), it was decided to attempt percutaneous treatment. Two bare metal stents (BMS-Rebel Boston Scientific®) were implanted respectively in the proximal segment of the LAD (3.0 * 24 mm) and the LCx (3.5 * 20 mm) (Fig. 3, Additional files 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9: Videos S2-S9).

Table 1 ᅟ
Fig. 1
figure 1

Trans-esophageal short axis view of the aorta showing the aortic bioprosthesis in a correct position, and a pronounced aortic root thickening (marked with the red arrow in the picture)

Fig. 2
figure 2

a, b and c (from the top to the bottom): a basal ECG showing atrial fibrillation with T-wave inversion in the inferior and anterolateral leads. b ECG acquired during chest pain showing anterior ST elevation. c The left coronary angiogram, showing occlusion of the proximal LAD and a long, tubular stenosis of the proximal LCx

Fig. 3
figure 3

The stent implantation procedure in the left coronary system before (on the left) and after (on the right) contrast injection; stents and coronary vessels involved are marked with black arrows

On admission to the coronary care unit the patient was in cardiogenic shock requiring inotropes, vasopressors and non-invasive ventilation. The biochemical results showed a white blood cell count (WBC) of 25,7 × 109/L, creatine kinase-MB fraction 184 μg/L, and Troponin I (TnI) > 70.000 μg/L. A transthoracic echocardiogram was performed (Fig. 4, Additional files 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14: Videos S10-S14) with evidence of severe biventricular dysfunction, severe mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, and significant tissue damage in the aortic prosthetic region, where a cavity was also identified, suggesting an abscess. Despite intensive treatment the patient died within 24 h.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Trans-thoracic short axis view of the aorta in bi-dimensional (on the left) and color mode representation (on the right), showing a cavity around the aortic root, highly suspicious for a peri-prosthetic abscess

Discussion

We describe a rare complication of prosthetic valve endocarditis: an aortic root abscess causing external coronary artery compression and acute myocardial infarction. Although a few reports of myocardial infarction during infective endocarditis involving a prosthetic valve exist in the literature, our case shows an unusual complication and treatment strategy.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis is associated with a high in-hospital mortality (more than 40%) [16, 17] and when complicated by an ACS, the morbidity and mortality rates further increase [18]. In the management algorithm presented by Manzano et al., when a patient presents with ACS and suspected endocarditis, a TEE should be performed and angiography, with percutaneous reperfusion, should only be considered if a ST segment elevation is present on the ECG in the absence of periannular complication [1]. In our case, an immediate coronary angiogram was performed because ST elevation myocardial infarction, complicated by haemodynamic instability, was evident, while the abscess cavity was only suspected. The hypothesis of external coronary compression due to periannular complication was, indeed, only formulated at the time of the invasive procedure due to the specific angiographic pattern (diffuse narrowing of the coronary arteries with severe stenosis of the proximal segments) along with the peculiar clinical presentation [19]. However, an erosion/perforation of the abscess into left coronary artery, could not be definitely ruled out. Some images, indeed, showed enrichment of the contrast medium in the abscess during angiography (Additional files 2 and 3: Video S2 and S3).

After a discussion with the surgical team, a two-step approach, with percutaneous revascularization first, aiming for restoration of stable hemodynamics, followed by a surgical procedure, was attempted, similar to the case described by Sugi K et al. [20].

The outcome in this setting is strongly affected by several different variables (grade of inflammatory response, pathogen causing endocarditis, sepsis dissemination, site of coronary obstruction and the grade of valve dysfunction) [20] and, unfortunately, our patient rapidly developed multi organ failure.

Conclusions

Considering the paucity of data available, the management of each patient presenting with ST elevation and valve/prosthetic endocarditis should be individualized and a multidisciplinary discussion should be advocated.

Patients with fever, and significant risk factors for endocarditis, who develop ACS, need a prompt diagnostic work up, including trans-esophageal echocardiography. The specific timing of echocardiographic follow-up and surgical intervention is still a matter of debate [17, 21], and our case aims to highlight the importance of this aspect in the management of endocarditis, in order to avoid severe complications that adversely affect patient prognosis.