Abstract
Background
Uroterocele causes atony and stagnation in the ureter, thus predisposing the patient to stone formation. Multiple calculi in uroteroceles are common in adults but very rare in children.
Case presentation
We describe the case of a 3-year-old boy who presented with hematuria and was found to have multiple ureteral and ureterocele stones. The diagnosis was made during endoscopic lithotripsy. A holmium/yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Ho–YAG) laser was used to excise the uroterocele and for lithotripsy.
Conclusions
In appropriate cases, minimally invasive techniques, for example, Ho–YAG laser lithotripsy and ureterocele excision may be preferred.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Background
A ureterocele is a dilation of the submucosal ureter due to a delay in Chawall’s membrane absorption. This anomaly causes atony and stagnation in the ureter, thus leading to stone formation in the patient [1]. Ureteroceles and stone association is common in adults but rarely seen in children [2]. In this case report, we describe the discovery of multiple ureteral and uroterocele stones in a 3-year-old boy.
2 Case presentation
A 3-year-old boy was admitted with hematuria of 1-month duration. The patient had no previous history of urinary tract infection, hematuria, or abdominal pain. The physical examination was unremarkable, and all laboratory tests were normal, except for hematuria. A plain abdominal radiograph was normal. Urinary tract computed tomography (CT) revealed normal renal parenchyma and a normal pelvis. At the lower end of the left ureter, it showed a 4 mm × 24 mm opacity, as well as an 11 × 6 mm opacity extending into the bladder adjacent to the first opacity (Fig. 1). Transurethral lithotripsy was performed. During the cystoscopy procedure, no left ureteral orifice was observed. However, a balloon-like ureterocele containing numerous millimeter-sized stones was observed (Fig. 2). The ureterocele was excised by holmium/yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Ho–YAG) laser lithotripsy. The laser energy and frequency were 0.6–1.0 J and 5–10 Hz, respectively. During the excision of the ureterocele, a large number of millimeter-sized stones were observed in the ureter. On the CT, they had the appearance of a single stone. After the excision of the ureterocele with the Ho–YAG laser, the orifice of the left ureter was made more prominent. The stones were spontaneously laid down in the bladder, and a 3F double-J stent was placed in the collecting system. To reduce the operative time, stone extraction was not performed. Instead, the fragments, which were smaller than 1–2 mm, were left to pass spontaneously. The total operative time was 30 min. The double-J stent was removed 1 month later. There was no recurrence of the stones and no additional pathology at follow up.
3 Discussion
A ureterocele is a dilation of the submucosal ureter due to a delay in Chawall’s membrane absorption. This anomaly causes atony and stagnation in the ureter, thus predisposing the patient to stone formation [1]. Ureteroceles and stone association is common in adults but rarely seen in children [2]. In this case report, we describe the discovery of multiple ureteral and uroterocele stones in a 3-year-old boy. The presence of a single stone in a single ureterocele has been reported in adults, with an incidence of 4–39% [3]. However, similar occurrences are rare in children. A stone in a ureterocele usually grows asymptomatically and causes hematuria and obstruction [4]. Sometimes, the stone can result in spontaneous erosion of the ureterocele [1]. Ultrasound, an intravenous pyelogram, and CT can be used to confirm the diagnosis of an uretorecele containing multiple stones. However, a lack of experience on the part of the radiologist may allow an ureterocele with multiple stones to go undetected [3, 4]. Our patient was just 3 years old, making this is the third youngest case report of multiple ureteral and ureterocele stones in the literature. It is also the first time laser lithotripsy has been used for ureterocele excision. In the present study, the small size of the multiple stones in the ureterocele meant there was no need for laser lithotripsy to break the stones. Both lithotripsy and ureterocele excision can be done with a Ho–YAG laser. However, in the limited number of pediatric patients in the literature, open surgery is generally preferred (Table 1).
4 Conclusion
A ureterocele and ureteral stones should be considered in patients who present with hematuria. In appropriate cases, minimally invasive techniques, for example, Ho–YAG laser lithotripsy and ureterocele excision may be preferred.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Mandal S, Goel A, Kumar M, Goyal NK, Sankhwar SN (2012) Spontaneous erosion of ureterocele wall by stone: rare images. Urology 80(4):e43–e44
Shamsa A, Asadpour AA, Abolbashari M, Hariri MK (2010) Bilateral simple orthotopic ureteroceles with bilateral stones in an adult: a case report and review of literature. Urol J 7:209–211
Gharbi Y, Gargah T, Boukesra T, Hellal Y, Sayed S (2013) Ureterocele containing a stone in a duplex system. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 24:984–987
Sarsu SB, Koku N, Karakus SC (2015) Multiple stones in a single-system ureterocele in a child. APSP J Case Rep 6(2):19
Moskowitz B, Bolkier M, Levin DR (1987) Ureterocele containing calcified stone. J Paediatr Surg 11:1047–1048
Scuderi MG, Yankovic F, Featherstone N, Smeulders N (2013) Voluminous, “cobra-head” stone in a duplex system ureterocele: combined cysto-ureteroscopic and percutaneous cystolithotomy approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(5):484–485
Gilbert WB, Hernanz-Schulman M, Pope JC 4th (2001) Development of small calculi in an infant with bilateral single system ureterocele. J Urol 166:880–881
Stafford AM, Logan H, O’Grady MJ (2014) “Cobra head” stone. J Pediatr 164(2):428.e1
Funding
This study had no funding from any resource.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZT, SY, RK, and FP gave idea and collected the patient’s data and analyzed them. SK and HO followed the patients postoperatively. RK wrote the paper. KS is guarantor with revision. They all approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Aproval by the institutional ethical committee has been waived (being a retrospective case report). Our institution does not require ethical approval for this case report. Written informed consent for the patient’s participation was given by his parents.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for the publication of this data was given by the patient’s parent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Turkyilmaz, Z., Yesil, S., Karabulut, R. et al. Coexistence of multiple ureteral and ureterocele stones in a patient. Afr J Urol 26, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-020-00032-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-020-00032-x