Feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements to assess physical activity in toddlers
Accelerometers are considered to be the most promising tool for measuring physical activity (PA) in free-living young children. So far, no studies have examined the feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements in children under 3 years of age. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to examine the feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements in toddlers (1- to 3-year olds).
Forty-seven toddlers (25 boys; 20 ± 4 months) wore a GT1M ActiGraph accelerometer for 6 consecutive days and parental perceptions of the acceptability of wearing the monitor were assessed to examine feasibility. To investigate the validity of the ActiGraph and the predictive validity of three ActiGraph cut points, accelerometer measurements of 31 toddlers (17 boys; 20 ± 4 months) during free play at child care were compared to directly observed PA, using the Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in Children-Preschool (OSRAC-P). Validity was assessed using Pearson and Spearman correlations and predictive validity using area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC-AUC).
The feasibility examination indicated that accelerometer measurements of 30 toddlers (63.8%) could be included with a mean registration time of 564 ± 62 min during weekdays and 595 ± 83 min during weekend days. According to the parental reports, 83% perceived wearing the accelerometer as 'not unpleasant and not pleasant' and none as 'unpleasant'. The validity evaluation showed that mean ActiGraph activity counts were significantly and positively associated with mean OSRAC-P activity intensity (r = 0.66; p < 0.001; n = 31). Further, the correlation among the ActiGraph activity counts and the OSRAC-P activity intensity level during each observation interval was significantly positive (ρ = 0.52; p < 0.001; n = 4218). Finally, the three sedentary cut points exhibited poor to fair classification accuracy (ROC-AUC: 0.56 to 0.71) while the three light PA (ROC-AUC: 0.51 to 0.62) and the three moderate-to-vigorous PA cut points (ROC-AUC: 0.53 to 0.57) demonstrated poor classification accuracy with respect to detecting sedentary behavior, light PA and moderate-to-vigorous PA, respectively.
The present findings suggest that ActiGraph accelerometer measurements are feasible and valid for quantifying PA in toddlers. However, further research is needed to accurately identify PA intensities in toddlers using accelerometry.
- Janz, KF, Burns, TL, Levy, SM (2005) Tracking of activity and sedentary behaviors in childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study. Am J Prev Med 29: pp. 171-178 CrossRef
- Herman, K, Craig, C, Gauvin, L, Katzmarzyk, P (2009) Tracking of obesity and physical activity from childhood to adulthood: the Physical Activity Longitudinal Study. Int J Pediatr Obes 4: pp. 281-288 CrossRef
- Timmons, BW, Naylor, PJ, Pfeiffer, KA (2007) Physical activity for preschool children - how much and how?. Can J Public Health 98: pp. S122-S134
- Janz, KF, Kwon, S, Letuchy, EM, Eichenberger Gilmore, JM, Burns, TL, Torner, JC, Willing, MC, Levy, SM (2009) Sustained Effect of Early Physical Activity on Body Fat Mass in Older Children. Am J Prev Med 37: pp. 35-40 CrossRef
- Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA): Get up and grow: Healthy eating and physical activity for early childhood. [http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/EDFEDB588460BCE3CA25762B00232A13/$File/gug-directorscoord-2.pdf]
- Clark, J, Clements, R, Guddemi, M, Morgan, D, Pica, R, Pivarnik, J, Rudisill, M, Small, E, Virgilio, S (2009) Active Start: A Statement of Physical Activity Guidelines for Children From Birth to Age 5. National Association for Sport and Physical Education, Sewickley
- Oliver, M (2007) Physical activity in preschoolers: understanding prevalence and measurement issues. Sports Med 37: pp. 1045-1070 CrossRef
- Pate, RR, O'Neill, JR, Mitchel, J (2010) Measurement of Physical Activity in Preschool Children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42: pp. 508-512
- Reilly, JJ, Penpraze, V, Hislop, J, Davies, G, Grant, S, Paton, JY (2008) Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data. Arch Dis Child 93: pp. 614-619 CrossRef
- Cliff, DP, Reilly, JJ, Okely, AD (2009) Methodological considerations in using accelerometers to assess habitual physical activity in children aged 0-5 years. J Sci Med Sport 12: pp. 557-567 CrossRef
- de Vries, SI, Van Hirtum, HW, Bakker, I, Hopman-Rock, M, Hirasing, RA, van Mechelen, W (2009) Validity and reproducibility of motion sensors in youth: a systematic update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: pp. 818-827 CrossRef
- Cardon, G, Van Cauwenberghe, E, De Bourdeaudhuij, I (2011) What do we know about physical activity in infants and toddlers: a review of the literature and future research directions. Science & Sports 26: pp. 127-130 CrossRef
- Gubbels, JS, Kremers, S, van Kann, DHH, Stafleu, A, Candel, MJ, Dagnelie, PC, Thijs, C, de Vries, NK (2011) Interaction between physical environment, social environment, and child characteristics in determining physical activity at child. Health Psychol 30: pp. 84-90 CrossRef
- Manios, Y (2006) Design and descriptive results of the "Growth, Exercise and Nutrition Epidemiological Study In preSchoolers": The GENESIS Study. BMC Public Health 6: pp. 32 CrossRef
- Child & Family (Kind & Gezin) [http://www.kindengezin.be/Themas/Kinderopvang/default.jsp]
- WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr 95: pp. 76-85 CrossRef
- Trost, SG (2005) Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: pp. S531-S543 CrossRef
- Ward, DS, Evenson, KR, Vaughn, A, Rodgers, AB, Troiano, RP (2005) Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: pp. S582-S588 CrossRef
- Rowlands, AV (2007) Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in children: an update. Pediatr Exerc Sci 19: pp. 252-266
- Santech Inc: [http://www.meterplussoftware.com/] Meterplus 4.2. [English]
- Van Cauwenberghe E, Labarque V, Trost SG, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G: Calibration and Comparison of Accelerometer Cut Points in Preschool Children. Int J Pediatr Obes, in press.
- Penpraze, V, Reilly, JJ, MacLean, CM, Montgomery, C, Kelly, LA, Paton, JY, Aitchison, T, Grant, S (2006) Monitoring of physical activity in young children: How much is enough?. Pediatr Exerc Sci 18: pp. 483-491
- Pate, RR, Almeida, MJ, McIver, KL, Pfeiffer, KA, Dowda, M (2006) Validation and calibration of an accelerometer in preschool children. Obesity 14: pp. 2000-2006 CrossRef
- Pfeiffer, KA, Dowda, M, McIver, K, Pate, RR (2009) Factors related to objectively measured physical activity in preschool children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 21: pp. 196-208
- Sirard, J, Trost, S, Pfeiffer, K, Dowda, M, Pate, RR (2005) Calibration and evaluation of an objective measure of physical activity in preschool children. J Phys Act Health 3: pp. 345-357
- Brown, WH, Pfeiffer, KA, McIver, KL, Dowda, M, Almeida, MJ, Pate, RR (2006) Assessing preschool children's physical activity: the Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in children-preschool version. Res Q Exerc Sport 77: pp. 167-176
- Brown, WH, Pfeiffer, KA, McIver, KL, Dowda, M, Almeida, MJ, Pate, RR (2009) Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in Children-Preschool (OSRAC-P). OSRAC-P Training Manual for Observers. University of South Carolina, Columbia
- Van Puyenbroeck J, Maes B, Laeremans P: [http://ppw.kuleuven.be/ortho/vitessa] Vitessa 0.1. [Dutch]
- Bland, MJ, Altman, DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8: pp. 135-160 CrossRef
- Jago, R, Zakeri, I, Baranowski, T, Watson, K (2007) Decision boundaries and receiver operating characteristic curves: new methods for determining accelerometer cutpoints. J Sports Sci 25: pp. 937-944 CrossRef
- Metz, CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8: pp. 283-298 CrossRef
- Verbestel V, Van Cauwenberghe E, De Coen V, Maes L, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G: Within- and between-day variability of objectively measured physical activity in preschoolers. Pediatr Exerc Sci, in press.
- Beets, MW, Bornstein, D, Dowda, M, Pate, RR (2011) Compliance With National Guidelines for Physical Activity in U.S. Preschoolers: Measurement and Interpretation. Pediatrics 127: pp. 658-664 CrossRef
- Grant, PM (2006) The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med 40: pp. 992-997 CrossRef
- Oliver, M, Schofield, GM, Schluter, PJ (2009) Accelerometry to assess preschooler's free play: Issues with count threshold and epoch durations. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 13: pp. 181-190 CrossRef
- Marshall SJ, Ramirez E: Reducing sedentary behavior: a new paradigm in physical activity promotion. Am J Lifestyle Med, in press.
- Feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements to assess physical activity in toddlers
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Online Date
- June 2011
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in Children-Preschool (OSRAC-P)
- Criterion validity
- Predictive validity
- Accelerometer cut points
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ghent, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- 2. Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands