The role of irrigation in determining the global land use impacts of biofuels
Recent studies have evaluated the land use consequences of biofuel programs and the associated carbon fluxes. However, all of these studies have effectively ignored the distinction between rainfed and irrigated lands and neglected the facts that irrigated croplands typically have much higher yields than their rainfed counterparts in the same region and that expansion in irrigated crops are limited in some regions due to water scarcity and irrigation constraint. This paper shows that these omissions introduce systematic biases in the measurement of biofuel-induced land use change emissions.
A new computable general equilibrium model which distinguishes irrigated and rainfed agriculture is developed. The new model is an enhanced version of the publicly available Global Trade Analysis Project model with Biofuels (GTAP-BIO) which has been widely used in this field frequently. To distinguish irrigated and rainfed agriculture, the biophysical component of the GTAP-BIO model is extensively modified using the most recent published data in this area. The economic component of the model is also modified to handle the distinction between irrigated and rainfed agriculture.
We find that ignoring the irrigated-rainfed distinction modestly underestimates global land use change, but results in sharply different geographic patterns of cropland expansion, with stronger rainfed expansion in more carbon-rich environments. This points to a significant underestimate of land use emissions in earlier studies.
To provide more accurate estimates of biofuel-induced land use emissions, it is critical to incorporate the role of irrigation in crop production, taking into account the fact that expansion in irrigation is constrained in some regions across the world.
- Gurgel A, Reilly J, Paltsev S: Potential land use implications of a global biofuels industry. J Agr Food Ind Organ 2007.,5(2): Article 9
- Searchinger, T, Heimlich, R, Houghton, R, Dong, F, Elobeid, A, Fabiosa, J, Tokgoz, S, Hayes, D, Yu, T (2008) Use of U.S. Croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319: pp. 1238-1240 CrossRef
- Fabiosa, J, Beghin, J, Dong, F, Elobeid, A, Tokgoz, S, Yu, T (2010) Land allocation effects of the global ethanol surge: predictions from the international FAPRI model. Land Econ 86: pp. 687-706
- Hertel, T (2010) The global supply and demand for agricultural land in 2050: A perfect storm in the making? American Journal of Agricultural Economics. pp. 259-275
- Taheripour, F, Hertel, T, Tyner, W, Bechman, J, Birur, D (2010) Biofuels and their by-products: global economic and environmental implications. Biomass Bioenerg 34: pp. 278-289 CrossRef
- Tyner, W, Taheripour, F, Zhuang, Q, Birur, D, Baldos, U (2010) Land use changes and consequent CO 2 emissions due to U.S. corn ethanol production: a comprehensive analysis. Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA
- Taheripour, F, Hertel, T, Tyner, W (2011) Implications of biofuels mandates for the global livestock industry: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Agr Econ 42: pp. 325-342 CrossRef
- Portmann, T, Siebert, S, Döll, P (2010) MIRCA2000-global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: a new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling. Global Biogeochem Cy 24: pp. GB1011 CrossRef
- Addams, L, Boccaletti, G, Kerlin, M, Stuchtey, M (2009) Charting our water future: economic frameworks to inform decision-making. McKinsey & Company, New York, USA
- Cai, X, Rosegrant, M (2002) Global water demand and supply projections, Part 1: a modeling approach. Water Int 27: pp. 159-169 CrossRef
- Rockström, J, Lannerstad, M, Falkenmark, M (2007) Assessing the water challenge of a new green revolution in developing countries. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104: pp. 6253-6260 CrossRef
- Taheripour, F, Birur, D, Hertel, T, Tyner, W (2007) Introducing liquid biofuels into the GTAP database, GTAP Research Memorandum No. 11. GTAP, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA
- Calzadilla, A, Rehdanz, K, Tol, R (2011) The GTAP-W model: accounting for water use in agriculture. Kiel Working Papers No. 1745. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Germany
- Tokgoz, S, Elobeid, A, Fabiosa, JF, Hayes, DJ, Babcock, BA, Yu, T, Dong, F, Hart, CE, Beghin, JC (2007) Emerging biofuels: outlook of effects on U.S. grain, oilseed, and livestock markets. Staff Report 07-SR 101, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, USA
- Kammen, DM, Farrell, AE, Plevin, RJ, Jones, AD, Delucchi, MA, Nemet, GF (2007) Energy and greenhouse impacts of biofuels: a framework for analysis. CrossRef
- Fargione, J, Hill, J, Tilman, D, Polasky, S, Hawthorne, P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319: pp. 1235-1238 CrossRef
- Hertel, T, Golub, A, Jones, A, O'Hare, M, Pelvin, R, Kammen, D (2010) Effects of U.S. maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: estimating market-mediated responses. Bioscience 60: pp. 223-231 CrossRef
- Al-Riffai, P, Dimaranan, B, Laborde, D (2010) Global trade and environmental impact study of the EU biofuels mandate. International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, DC
- Renewable fuel standard program (RFS2) regulatory impact analysis. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC
- Laborde, D (2011) Assessing the land use change consequences of European biofuels policies. International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, DC
- Timilsina, G, Beghin, J, Mensbrugghe, D, Mevel, S (2012) The impacts of biofuels targets on land-use change and food supply: a global CGE assessment. Agr Econ 43: pp. 315-332 CrossRef
- Keeney, R, Hertel, T (2009) Indirect land use impacts of us biofuels policies: the importance of acreage, yield and bilateral trade responses. Am J Agr Econ 91: pp. 895-909 CrossRef
- Berry, S (2011) Biofuels policy and the empirical inputs to GTAP models. Working paper, California Air Resource Board, CA, USA
- Villoria, NB, Hertel, TW (2011) Geography matters: international trade patterns and the indirect land use effects of biofuels. Am J Agr Econ 93: pp. 919-935 CrossRef
- Wicke, B, Verweij, P, Meijl, H, Vuuren, D, Faaij, A (2012) Indirect land use changes: review of existing models and strategies for mitigation. Biofuels 3: pp. 87-100 CrossRef
- Fraiture, C, Giordano, M, Liao, Y (2008) Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy. Water Policy 10: pp. 67-81 CrossRef
- Hoogeveen, J, Faures, J, Giessen, N (2009) Increased biofuel production in the coming decade: to what extend will it affect global freshwater resources?. Irrig Drain 58: pp. S148-S160 CrossRef
- Dominguez-Faus, R, Powers, S, Burken, J, Alverez, J (2009) The water footprint of biofuels: a drink or drive issue?. Environ Sci Technol 43: pp. 3005-3010 CrossRef
- Hertel, TW (1997) Global trade analysis, modeling and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- Hertel, T, Rose, S, Tol, R (2008) Land use in computable general equlibrium models: An overview.
- Rosegrant, MW, Ringler, C, Msangi, S, Cline, SA, Sulser, TB (2005) International model for policy analysis of agricultural commodities and trade (IMPACT-WATER): model description. International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, DC
- Kuhn, A (2003) From world market to trade flow modelling - the re-designed WATSIM model.
- Adams, DM, Alig, RJ, Callaway, JM, McCarl, BA, Winnett, SM (1996) The forest and agriculture sector optimization model (FASOM): model structure and policy applications. Research Paper PNW-RP-495, USDA Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon
- Greenhouse gas mitigation potential in U.S. forestry and agriculture, EPA-R-05-006. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Washington, DC
- Lotze-Campen, H, Muller, C, Bondeau, A, Jachner, A, Popp, A, Lucht, W (2008) Food demand, productivity growth and the spatial distribution of land and water use: a global modeling approach. Agr Econ 39: pp. 325-338
- Schmitz, C, Biewald, A, Lotze-Campen, H, Popp, A, Dietrich, J, Bodirsky, B, Krause, M, Weindl, I (2012) Trading more food: implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and the food system. Global Environ Chang 22: pp. 189-209 CrossRef
- Monfreda, C, Ramankutty, N, Foley, J (2008) Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem Cy 22: pp. GB1022 CrossRef
- Alexandratos, N, Bruinsma, J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA working paper no. 12-03. Global Perspective Studies Team, FAO Agricultural Development Economics Division, Rome, Italy
- Horridge, M (2005) SplitCom: programs to disaggregate a GTAP sector. Monash University, Melbourne, Centre of Policy Studies
- Smakhtin, V (2011) Water management in developing world: adapting to increasing variability and changes. Presentation at Stanford University.
- Plevin, R, Gibbs, H, Duffy, J, Yui, S, Yeh, S (2011) Agro-ecological zone emission factor model. California Air Resource Board, USA
- The role of irrigation in determining the global land use impacts of biofuels
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Energy, Sustainability and Society
- Online Date
- February 2013
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Irrigated agriculture
- Rainfed agriculture
- Irrigation constraints
- Indirect land use change
- Computational general equilibrium