Skip to main content
Log in

In-situ dual-port polarization contrast imaging of Faraday rotation in a high optical depth ultracold 87Rb atomic ensemble

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the effects of high optical depth and density on the performance of a light-atom quantum interface. An in-situ imaging method, a dual-port polarization contrast technique, is presented. This technique is able to compensate for image distortions due to refraction. We propose our imaging method as a tool to characterize atomic ensembles for high capacity spatial multimode quantum memories. Ultracold dense inhomogeneous rubidium samples are imaged and we find a resonant optical depth as high as 680 on the D1 line. The measurements are compared with light-atom interaction models based on Maxwell-Bloch equations. We find that an independent atom assumption is insufficient to explain our data and present corrections due to resonant dipole-dipole interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.M. Duan, M.D. Lukin, J.I. Cirac, P. Zoller, Nature 414, 413 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Julsgaard, J.Sherson, J.I. Cirac, J. Fiursášek, E. Polzik, Nature 432, 482 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Zhang, S.R. Garner, L.V. Hau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 233602 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Simon, M. Afzelius, J. Appel, A. Boyer de la Giroday, S.J. Dewhurst, N. Gisin, C.Y. Hu, F. Jelezko, S. Kröll, J.H. Müller, J. Nunn, E.S. Polzik, J.G. Rarity, H. de Riedmatten, W. Rosenfeld, A.J. Shields, N. Skoeld, R.M. Stevenson, R. Thew, I.A. Walmsley, M.C. Weber, H. Weinfurter, J. Wrachtrup, R.J. Young, Eur. Phys. J. D 58, 1 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. H.J. Kimble, Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Zeuthen, A. Grodecka-Grad, A. Sørensen, Phys. Rev. A 84, 043838 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D.V. Vasilyev, I.V. Sokolov, E.S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. A 81, 020302(R) (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Budker, W. Gawlik, D. Kimball, S. Rochester, V. Yashchuk, A. Weis, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1153 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Julsgaard, A. Kozhekin, E.S. Polzik, Nature 413, 400 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Kubasik, M. Koschorreck, M. Napolitano, S. de Echaniz, H. Crepaz, J. Eschner, E. Polzik, M. Mitchell, Phys. Rev. A 79, 043815 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Takahashi, K. Honda, N. Tanaka, K. Toyoda, K. Ishikawa, T. Yabuzaki, Phys. Rev. A 60, 4974 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. G.A. Smith, S. Chaudhury, P.S. Jessen, J. Opt. B Quant. Semiclass. Opt. 5, 323 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Liu, S. Jung, S. Maxwell, L. Turner, E. Tiesinga, P. Lett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 125301 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Terraciano, M. Bashkansky, F. Fatemi, Phys. Rev. A 77, 063417 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Siddons, N.C. Bell, Y. Cai, C.S. Adams, I.G. Hughes, Nat. Photon. 3, 225 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Rath, T. Yefsah, K. Günter, M. Cheneau, R. Desbuquois, M. Holzmann, W. Krauth, J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. A 82, 013609 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Weller, R.J. Bettles, P. Siddons, C.S. Adams, I.G. Hughes, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 195006 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Meppelink, R.A. Rozendaal, S.B. Koller, J.M. Vogels, P. van der Straten, Phys. Rev. A 81, 053632 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Higbie, L. Sadler, S. Inouye, A. Chikkatur, S. Leslie, K. Moore, V. Savalli, D. Stamper-Kurn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 050401 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. C.C. Bradley, C.A. Sackett, R.G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 985 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M.R. Andrews, M.O. Mewes, N.J. van Druten, D.S. Durfee, D.M. Kurn, W. Ketterle, Science 273, 84 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Turner, K. Domen, R. Scholten, Phys. Rev. A 72, 031403 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. K. Hammerer, A.S. Sørensen, E.S. Polzik, Rev. Mod, Phys. 82, 1041 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Vengalattore, J. Guzman, S.R. Leslie, F. Serwane, D.M. Stamper-Kurn, Phys. Rev. A 81, 053612 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J.H. Müller, P. Petrov, D. Oblak, C.L.G. Alzar, S.R. de Echaniz, E.S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. A 71, 033803 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Gerbier, J. Thywissen, S. Richard, M. Hugbart, P. Bouyer, A. Aspect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 030405 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L.P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. D.V. Kupriyanov, O.S. Mishina, I.M. Sokolov, B. Julsgaard, E.S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032348 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Geremia, J. Stockton, H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. A 73, 042112 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Koschorreck, M.W. Mitchell, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 195502 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Movre, G. Pichler, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 13, 697 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Movre, G. Pichler, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 10, 2631 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Kemmann, I. Mistrik, S. Nussmann, H. Helm, C. Williams, P. Julienne, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022715 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. R.J. LeRoy, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 3869 (1970)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. P.S. Julienne, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan. 101, 487 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. K. Burnett, P. Julienne, K.A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1416 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. O. Morice, Y. Castin, J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. A 51, 3896 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. I. Sokolov, M. Kupriyanova, D. Kupriyanov, M. Havey, Phys. Rev. A 79, 053405 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Grodecka-Grad, E. Zeuthen, A.S. Sørensen, arXiv:1110.6771 (2011)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Kaminski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaminski, F., Kampel, N.S., Steenstrup, M.P.H. et al. In-situ dual-port polarization contrast imaging of Faraday rotation in a high optical depth ultracold 87Rb atomic ensemble. Eur. Phys. J. D 66, 227 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2012-30038-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2012-30038-0

Keywords

Navigation