Abstract
Ratios of coupling constants for these decays are compared with qq̄ predictions and Jaffe’s q2q̄2 model. In both models, the predicted ratio g2(κ→Kπ)/g2(σ→ππ) is much too small. Also, for qq̄, the predicted ratio g2(κ→Kη’)/g2(κ→Kπ) is much larger than observed. Both models fail for g2(f0→KK)/g2(a0→KK). This ratio requires that f0 has a dominant KK component. It arises naturally because the f0 pole lies very close to the KK threshold, giving its wave function a long KK tail.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V.E. Markushin, M. P Locher, Frascati Physics Series 15, 229 (1999)
E.M. Aitala et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 765 (2001)
M. Ablikim et al., Phys. Lett. B 598, 149 (2004)
R.J. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D 15, 267 (1977)
D.V. Bugg, Phys. Lett. B 632, 471 (2006)
F. Okiharu et al., hep-ph/0507187
D. Lohse, J.W. Durso, K. Holinde, J. Speth, Phys. Lett. B 234, 235 (1990)
B.S. Zou, D.V. Bugg, Phys. Rev. D 50, 591 (1993)
M.P. Locher, V.E. Markushin, H.Q. Zheng, Eur. Phys. J. C 4, 317 (1998)
G. Janssen, B.C. Pearce, K. Holinde, J. Speth, Phys. Rev. D 52, 2690 (1995)
L. Castillejo, R.H. Dalitz, F.J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 101, 453 (1956)
E. van Beveren et al., Z. Phys. C 30, 615 (1986)
E. van Beveren, G. Rupp, N. Petropoulos, F. Kleefeld, AIP Conf. Proc. 660, 353 (2003)
E. van Beveren, G. Rupp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 012003 (2003)
N.A. Törnqvist, Z. Phys. C 68, 647 (1995)
M. Ablikim et al., Phys. Lett. B 607, 243 (2005)
V. Baru et al., Phys. Lett. B 586, 53 (2004)
D.V. Bugg, V.V. Anisovich, A.V. Sarantsev, B.S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4412 (1994)
N.N. Achasov, G.N. Shestakov, Phys. Rev. D 49, 5779 (1994)
J.A. Oller, Phys. Rev. D 71, 054030 (2005)
D.V. Bugg, Phys. Lett. B 572, 1 (2003)
A.V. Anisovich, V.V. Anisovich, A.V. Sarantsev, Z. Phys. A 359, 173 (1997)
D. Aston et al., Nucl. Phys. B 296, 253 (1988)
D.V. Bugg, accompanying paper [hep-ex/0603023]
B. Hyams et al., Nucl. Phys. B 64, 134 (1973)
C. Amsler et al., Phys. Lett. B 294, 451 (1992)
J.A. Oller, Nucl. Phys. A 727, 353 (2003)
D.M. Alde et al., Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 54, 455 (1991); Phys. Lett. B 276, 375 (1992)
D. Barberis et al., Phys. Lett. B 471, 429 (2000)
D.V. Bugg, Phys. Rep. 397, 257 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
PACS
13.25.Gv, 14.40.Gx, 13.40.Hq
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bugg, D. Decays of σ, κ, a0(980) and f0(980). Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 57–64 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2006-02561-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2006-02561-3