Abstract
We calculated a differential cross section of the Higgs boson production in the \(h\rightarrow ZZ^*\rightarrow 4\ell \) decay channel within the framework of \(k_T\)-factorization. Results are obtained using an off-shell matrix element for the \(g^*g^*\rightarrow h\rightarrow ZZ^*\rightarrow 4\ell \) process together with Ciafaloni–Catani–Fiorani–Marchesini (CCFM) evolution equations for an unintegrated gluon distribution function. We have presented a comparison of our results with the latest experimental measurements at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\) and \(\sqrt{S} = 13\ \hbox {TeV}\) from the ATLAS and CMS collaborations at the LHC. In addition to this, we have compared our results with the results from the collinear factorization formalism calculated up to next-to-next-to-leading order plus next-to-next-to-leading logarithm (NNLO + NNLL) accuracy obtained using the HRes code for the Higgs boson production in the gluon-gluon fusion process. Our estimates are consistently close to NNLO + NNLL results obtained using a collinear factorization formalism and are also in agreement with experimental measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The Higgs boson discovery at the LHC, by ATLAS and CMS collaborations [1, 2], has enabled experimental measurements to be taken to investigate its properties. The ATLAS and CMS collaborations have performed an improved measurement of the Higgs boson mass, considering an invariant mass spectra of the \(h\rightarrow \gamma \gamma \) and \(h\rightarrow ZZ^*\rightarrow 4\ell \) decay channels [3, 4]. Further studies of spin and the parity quantum number of the Higgs boson have established that it is a neutral scalar boson, with a mass equal to 125.09 GeV, rather than a pseudoscalar boson [5,6,7]. Its coupling strength to vector bosons and to fermions is studied by analyzing various decay modes of the Higgs boson [4, 8,9,10]. Establishing various aspects of the Higgs boson’s properties and coupling strength allows us to study other aspects of it.
A dominant channel for the inclusive Higgs boson production at the LHC is gluon–gluon fusion [11,12,13]. Hence, the Higgs boson production at the LHC can be effectively used to understand the gluon dynamics inside a proton. The gluon density \(xf_g(x,\mu ^2_F)\) in a proton is a function of the Bjorken variable x and the hard scale \(\mu ^2_F\). The scale evolution of parton densities, in general, is described using the Dokshitzer–Gribov–Lipatov–Altarelli–Parisi (DGLAP) evolution equation [14, 16, 18, 19], where large logarithmic terms proportional to \(\ln \mu ^2_F\) are resummed up to all orders.
The factorization theorem in perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) allows us to write a convolution of the matrix element of the short distance process and the universal parton distribution functions to obtain an inclusive cross section for a given scattering process [21]. The QCD collinear factorization theorem is based on the collinear approach where the parton distribution function depends on the longitudinal momentum fraction x and the hard scale \(\mu ^2_F\). The Higgs boson production cross section at leading order and higher order QCD corrections to it, up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order (\(\hbox {N}^3\hbox {LO}\)), have been computed within the collinear factorization framework [22,23,24,25,26,27]. However, it should be noted that the NNLO and \(\hbox {N}^3\hbox {LO}\) results that were obtained so far are using an effective theory and in the heavy top quark mass limit. Study of the Higgs boson’s transverse momentum spectrum resummed at NNLL accuracy is shown in Refs. [28,29,30]. Recently, the state-of-the-art predictions for the Higgs boson’s transverse momentum at the LHC, at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading-logarithmic accuracy (\(\hbox {N}^3\hbox {LL}\)) matched, at NNLO is presented in Ref. [31].
For the inclusive Higgs boson production at the LHC, the longitudinal momentum fraction of the incident gluons is small (\(x_1 x_2\sim \) 0.0089–0.0175). This domain of small longitudinal momentum fraction (x) is still in the perturbative regime where is it expected that collinear factorization should break down because the large logarithmic term proportional to 1 / x becomes dominant [32,33,34]. The contribution from the terms proportional to 1 / x is taken into account in the Balitsky–Fadin–Kuraev–Lipatov (BFKL) evolution equation [35, 37, 39]. An unintegrated parton densities (uPDFs) obeying BFKL evolution, convoluted with an off-shell matrix element within a generalized factorization is called \(k_T\)-factorization [41, 42, 44,45,46]. The evolution equation is valid for both small x and large x is given by the Ciafaloni–Catani–Fiorani–Marchesini (CCFM) evolution equation [47,48,49,50]. CCFM evolution is equivalent to BFKL evolution in the limit of very small x and is equivalent to the DGLAP evolution for a large x region.
In this work, we have not implemented the reggeized parton approach [51,52,53,54,55] based on the Lipatov effective action formalism, which ensures a gauge invariance of the off-shell amplitude [56, 57]. However, our investigation is based on the assumption that the off-shell partonic amplitudes being gauge-invariant in a small-x limit. The approach, which is based on Lipatov effective action formalism that has been employed recently in the calculation using \(k_T\)-factorization approach for the inclusive prompt photon production at LHC [58].
In this paper, the inclusive Higgs boson production within the \(k_T\)-factorization approach, together with CCFM evolution equations have been studied and demonstrated importance of higher order corrections included within the \(k_T\)-factorization [59]. The authors of Ref. [60] have shown that \(k_T\)-factorization gives a description of an experimental data from ATLAS experiment for the differential cross section of the Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel. They have calculated a leading order (LO) matrix element for the partonic subprocess \(gg\rightarrow h\rightarrow \gamma \gamma \) considering gluons to be off-shell. Inclusive Higgs boson production analysis based on off-shell gluon-gluon fusion, and considering \(H\rightarrow \gamma \gamma \), \(H\rightarrow ZZ^*\rightarrow 4\ell \) (where \(\ell = e,\mu \)) and \(H\rightarrow W^+W^- \rightarrow e^{\pm }\mu ^{\mp }\nu \bar{\nu }\) decay channel is given in Ref. [61].
The ATLAS and CMS collaboration at the LHC presented a measurement of a fiducial differential cross section of the Higgs boson decay into four-leptons at \(\sqrt{S} =8\hbox { TeV}\) [62, 63] and \(\sqrt{S} = 13\hbox { TeV}\) [64]. We compare the results obtained using the \(k_T\)-factorization approach with the recent ATLAS and CMS data. We have evaluated the off-shell matrix element for the partonic subprocess \(g^*g^*\rightarrow h\rightarrow ZZ^*\rightarrow 4\ell , \ell =e,\mu \). Convolution of the off-shell matrix element of partonic subprocess with CCFM uPDFs [65] is used to obtain a differential cross section.
This article is organized as follows: We discuss in detail the formalism behind our study and the necessary expressions for further numerical analysis in Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, we give the results of our numerical simulation. Here we also discuss the details of the analyses that have gone into the study. Finally, we conclude and draw inferences from the analysis in Sect. 4.
2 Formalism
In the present section, we briefly discuss the formalism we have used in our study. The details are in the Appendix A and B. In Sect. 1, we have mentioned that to explore the effects of \(k_T\)-factorization, we need to take the initial state partons to be off-shell. In calculating the off-shell matrix element for the process \(g^*\!g^*\!\rightarrow \!h\!\rightarrow \!ZZ^*\!\rightarrow \!4\ell \) (see Fig. 1), we have used the effective field theory approach. The effective Lagrangian in the large top quark mass limit, \(m_t \rightarrow \infty \), for the Higgs boson coupling to gluon is [66, 67]:
where \(\alpha _s\) and \(G_F\) are the strong and Fermi coupling constants, respectively. \(G^a_{\mu \nu }\) is the gluon field strength tensor and h is the Higgs scalar field. The effective ggh triangle vertex (see Eq. (11)) thus becomes
The non-zero transverse momentum for an initial gluon leads to the corresponding polarization sum [41, 42]:
Using Eqs. (2) and (3), we derived the off-shell matrix element for the hard scattering process. The matrix element thus obtained is given by Eq. (23) as:
where
Here \(\varGamma _h\) and \(\varGamma _Z\) are the total decay widths of the Higgs boson and Z boson, respectively. \(\mathbf{k}_{i\perp }\) are the intrinsic transverse momenta of the initial gluons. \(\varphi \) is the azimuthal angle between \(\mathbf{k}_{1\perp }\) and \(\mathbf{k}_{2\perp }\). \(m_h\) and \(m_Z\) are the Higgs boson and Z boson masses, respectively. The partonic center of mass energy is denoted by \(\hat{s}\). \(\theta _W\) and \(g_W\) are the weak mixing angle and the coupling of weak interaction, respectively.
Finally, we arrived at the hadronic cross section for the off-shell hard scattering amplitude of Eq. (4) within the framework of \(k_T\)-factorization asFootnote 1 (see Eq. (36))
with the longitudinal momentum fractions \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) of initial gluons to be
and the transverse momenta:
In Eq. (5), \(\varphi _{1,2}\) are the azimuthal angle of \(\mathbf{k}_{1\perp ,2\perp }\). y and \(\mathbf{p}_{\perp }\) are rapidities and transverse momenta of the final state leptons, respectively. The hadronic center of mass energy is denoted by S.
3 Results and discussion
With all the calculational tools at our disposal, we proceed to perform a numerical calculation using Eq. (5) together with the off-shell hard scattering amplitude given in Eq. (4). We estimate the cross section of the Higgs boson production as a function of transverse momentum (\(p_T\)) and rapidity (y) of the Higgs boson in the four-lepton decay channel. Results are obtained using CCFM A0 the set of uPDFs [65] which is commonly used for such phenomenological studies. Recently a fit to a high precision data from deeply inelastic scattering at the HERA is performed using a \(k_T\)-factorization and CCFM evolution [69]. A transverse momentum dependent gluon density function including experimental and theoretical uncertainties were obtained. The application of these unintegrated gluon densities to vector boson + jet production processes at LHC is given in Ref. [70]. Unintegrated gluon densities including experimental and theoretical uncertainties are given in the CCFM JH2013-set in TMDlib library [71, 72]. We have used the TMDlib library to calculate our results using CCFM JH2013-set. For our phenomenological study, we have used the CCFM JH2013-set2 which is determined from the fit to both stucture functions \(F^{(charm)}_2\) and \(F_2\) data whereas CCFM JH2013-set1 is determined from the fit to inclusive \(F_2\) data only.
Total decay width and mass of the Higgs boson is set to be equal to 4.0 MeV and 125.09 GeV, respectively [7]. We have implemented kinematical cuts on the rapidity and transverse momentum of leptons used by ATLAS and CMS experiments in their measurements. For the ATLAS experiment, the absolute value of rapidity is \(|\eta |< 2.5\) and the leading transverse momentum of the lepton is \(p_T < 20\) GeV. The transverse momenta of sub-leading leptons are \(p_T < 15, 10, 7\) GeV. Similarly for the CMS experiment, the absolute value of rapidity is \(|\eta |< 2.5\) and the ordered transverse momenta of the leptons are \(p_T < 20, 10, 7, 7\) GeV. The cross section in Eq. (5) depends on the renormalization and factorization scales \(\mu _R\) and \(\mu _F\), respectively. The scale uncertainty in the cross section is estimated by varying the scale between \(\mu _R = \mu _F = m_h/2\) and \(\mu _R = \mu _F = 2 m_h\).
We have also calculated a total inclusive cross section for the Higgs boson production with \(k_T \rightarrow 0\) and averaged over an azimuthal angle of the Higgs boson. This result of the inclusive cross section is equivalent to the cross section obtained using the collinear factorization approach at LO while using collinear parton densities. We have used the Martin–Stirling–Thorne–Watt (MSTW) set [73] for collinear parton densities. We have also obtained results of the total inclusive cross section for the Higgs production with \(k_T\)-factorization formalism using the CCFM JH2013-set2 of uPDFs.
In Table 1, we have given our results for the total inclusive cross section for the Higgs production, using both collinear and \(k_T\)-factorization framework. Our results, for total inclusive cross section, obtained using collinear approach, are consistent with the results obtained in Ref. [74] at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\). The results obtained with \(k_T\)-factorization is close to next-to-leading order (NNLO) results given in Ref. [74] at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\). The cross section estimates given here are for a gluon–gluon fusion process only. The inclusive cross section for the Higgs boson production can be obtained using a hadron level Monte Carlo event generator called CASCADE [75]. CASCADE uses the CCFM evolution equation in the initial state with the off-shell parton level matrix element.
Differential cross section of the Higgs boson production as a function of transverse momentum (\(p_T\)) and rapidity (y) of the Higgs boson in four-lepton decay channel at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\). Solid (red) line and dashed (purple) line is a result obtained using \(k_T\)-factorization approach with CCFM JH2013-set2 and CCFM A0 unintegrated gluon densities respectively. Filled triangle and filled square points corresponds to estimates obtained using HRes tool [28, 76] up to NNLO + NNLL accuracy and shaded region corresponds to scale uncertainty in renormalization and factorization scale. Experimental data points are from ATLAS [62]. The error bars on the data points shows total (statistical \(\oplus \) systematic) uncertainty
Differential cross section of the Higgs boson production as a function of transverse momentum (\(p_T\)) and rapidity (y) of the Higgs boson in four-lepton decay channel at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\). Notations of all the histograms are the same as in fig. 2. Higher order pQCD predictions up to NNLO + NNLL accuracy are obtained using HRes tool [28, 76]. Experimental data points are from CMS [63]
Differential cross section of the Higgs boson production as a function of transverse momentum (\(p_T\)) and rapidity (y) of the Higgs boson in four-lepton decay channel at \(\sqrt{S} = 13\hbox { TeV}\). Notations of all the histograms are the same as in Fig. 2. Higher order pQCD predictions up to NNLO + NNLL accuracy are obtained using HRes tool [28, 76]
We have presented our results in Figs. 2, 3 and 4. Figures 2, 4 shows the result of the differential cross section for the Higgs boson production in the four-lepton decay channel at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\) and \(\sqrt{S} = 13\hbox { TeV}\), respectively. We have compared our results of the differential cross section obtained using the \(k_T\)-factorization approach with experimental measurements from the ATLAS at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\), 13 TeV and CMS collaboration at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\) [62, 63]. The solid (red) and dashed (purple) histogram corresponds to our results obtained using the CCFM JH2013-set2 set of uPDFs and CCFM A0 set of uPDFs respectively. We also see that the results obtained using CCFM JH2013-set2 has a better agreement with experimetal measurements than A0 set.
Our results are plotted against state-of-the-art results for the cross section calculated up to next-to-leading order plus next-to-leading logarithm (NLO + NLL) and next-to-next-to-leading order plus next-to-next-leading logarithm (NNLO + NNLL) obtained using the HRes tool [28, 76] within the collinear factorization framework. Our results of both the differential cross section in \(p_T\) and y using the \(k_T\)-factorization framework with CCFM unintegrated PDFs are consistently close to NNLO + NNLL results at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\) and \(\sqrt{S} = 13\hbox { TeV}\). This can be explained considering the fact that the main part of higher order corrections are included in the \(k_T\)-factorization approach [59, 77, 78]. For the \(p_T\) distribution, we are using the convention that NLO + NLL and NNLO + NNLL results are labelled as LO + NLL and NLO + NNLL, respectively considering that the \(p_T\) distribution is non-zero at NLO.
4 Conclusions
In this paper, we present a phenomenological study of the Higgs boson production in the four-lepton decay channel within the \(k_T\)-factorization framework. Here CCFM unintegrated parton densities were convoluted with the hard matrix element, considering initial gluons to be off-shell. We present a comparison of our results with experimental measurements. Our results are evaluated using same experimental conditions (i.e., the same \(p_T\) and y cuts were used for our estimates as given by the experimental results) for both the ATLAS and CMS at \(\sqrt{S} = 8\hbox { TeV}\) and at \(\sqrt{S} = 13\hbox { TeV}\), respectively.
Further comparison of our estimates with the state-of-the-art results of a differential cross section within collinear factorization up to NLO + NLL and NNLO + NNLL obtained using HRes code is presented. We have also estimated a total inclusive cross section for the Higgs boson production within both collinear factorization and \(k_T\)-factorization framework. Within \(k_T\) factorization approach, we have compared the results obtained using CCFM JH2013-set2 and CCFM A0 uPDF set. Our results for the differential cross section with CCFM JH2012-set2 are close to the NNLO + NNLL results obtained using the HRes tool.
Our results show that the observed \(p_T\) distribution of the final state can be generated at leading order subprocesses, using unintegrated gluon distributions. Moreover, gluons in the initial state have finite transverse momenta, which results in the transverse momenta of the final state. The total inclusive cross section estimated using \(k_T\)-factorization is close to the NNLO results obtained using collinear factorization. The main reason for this behavior is that the main part of higher order correction in collinear pQCD is already included in the \(k_T\)-factorization [79] framework.
The higher order corrections within \(k_T\)-factorization at the parton level would be an interesting study, to see any additional effect. The cross section for the Higgs boson production has been calculated using a mixture of LO and NLO partonic diagrams and unintegrated PDFs from the \(k_T\)-factorization. Considering the effect of the transverse momentum of the initial gluon on the transverse momentum distribution of the final state, our study, as well as further studies in this direction could impose constraints on uPDFs of gluons.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: This paper presents a theoretical study of the possible scenarios in the case discussed. All the plots are for the demonstration only using the simulated results where no actual data has been used except those from the experiments at the ATLAS and CMS of the LHC. Those experimental data can be obtained from the references given in the text.]
Notes
The processes contributing to 4 lepton final states are \(e^+e^-e^+e^-\), \(\mu ^+\mu ^-\mu ^+\mu ^-\), \(e^+e^-\mu ^+\mu ^-\) and \(\mu ^+\mu ^-e^+e^-\). We have added these contributions with proper weight. The first two processes have two pairs of identical particles. Hence their phase space has to be multiplied by a factor \((1/2)\times (1/2) = 1/4\) to get rid of overcounting.
References
Georges Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 716, 1–29 (2012)
Serguei Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 716, 30–61 (2012)
Georges Aad et al., Measurement of the Higgs boson mass from the \(H\rightarrow \gamma \gamma \) and \(H \rightarrow ZZ^{*} \rightarrow 4\ell \) channels with the ATLAS detector using 25 \(\text{ fb }^{-1}\) of \(pp\) collision data. Phys. Rev. D 90(5), 052004 (2014)
Vardan Khachatryan et al., Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and tests of compatibility of its couplings with the standard model predictions using proton collisions at. Eur. Phys. J. C 75(5), 212 (2015)
Serguei Chatrchyan et al., Study of the Mass and Spin-Parity of the Higgs Boson Candidate Via Its Decays to Z Boson Pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(8), 081803 (2013)
Georges Aad et al., Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data. Phys. Lett. B 726, 120–144 (2013)
C. Patrignani et al., Review of Particle Physics. Chin. Phys. C40(10), 100001 (2016)
Vardan Khachatryan et al., Constraints on the spin-parity and anomalous HVV couplings of the Higgs boson in proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV. Phys. Rev. D 92(1), 012004 (2015)
Georges Aad et al. Study of the spin and parity of the Higgs boson in diboson decays with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J., C75(10), 476, (2015). [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J.C76,no.3,152(2016)]
Georges Aad et al., Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and coupling strengths using pp collision data at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) and 8 TeV in the ATLAS experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C 76(1), 6 (2016)
H.M. Georgi, S.L. Glashow, M.E. Machacek, Dimitri V Nanopoulos, Higgs Bosons from Two Gluon Annihilation in Proton Proton Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 692 (1978)
D. Graudenz, M. Spira, P.M. Zerwas, QCD corrections to Higgs boson production at proton proton colliders. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1372–1375 (1993)
M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, P.M. Zerwas, Higgs boson production at the LHC. Nucl. Phys. B 453, 17–82 (1995)
V.N. Gribov, L.N. Lipatov, Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15, 438–450 (1972)
V.N. Gribov, L.N. Lipatov, Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory. Yad. Fiz. 15, 781 (1972)
L.N. Lipatov, The parton model and perturbation theory. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 20, 94–102 (1975)
L.N. Lipatov, The parton model and perturbation theory. Yad. Fiz. 20, 181 (1974)
G.Guido Altarelli, Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language. Nucl. Phys. B 126, 298–318 (1977)
L. Yuri, Dokshitzer, Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and \(e^+ e^-\) Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics. Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 641–653 (1977)
L. Yuri, Dokshitzer, Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and \(e^+ e^-\) Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 73, 1216 (1977)
John C. Collins, Davison E. Soper, George F. Sterman, Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD. Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 5, 1–91 (1989)
S. Dawson, Radiative corrections to Higgs boson production. Nucl. Phys. B 359, 283–300 (1991)
A. Djouadi, M. Spira, P.M. Zerwas, Production of Higgs bosons in proton colliders: QCD corrections. Phys. Lett. B 264, 440–446 (1991)
Robert V. Harlander, William B. Kilgore, Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 201801 (2002)
Charalampos Anastasiou, Kirill Melnikov, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD. Nucl. Phys. B 646, 220–256 (2002)
V. Ravindran, J. Smith, W.L. van Neerven, NNLO corrections to the total cross-section for Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions. Nucl. Phys. B 665, 325–366 (2003)
Charalampos Anastasiou, Claude Duhr, Falko Dulat, Franz Herzog, Bernhard Mistlberger, Higgs Boson Gluon-Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 212001 (2015)
D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini, D. Tommasini, Higgs boson production at the LHC: transverse momentum resummation effects in the \(H\rightarrow \gamma \gamma \), \(H \rightarrow WW \rightarrow \ell \nu \ell \nu \) and \(H \rightarrow ZZ \rightarrow 4\ell \) decay modes. JHEP 06, 132 (2012)
G. Bozzi, S. Catani, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, The q(T) spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC in QCD perturbation theory. Phys. Lett. B 564, 65–72 (2003)
Giuseppe Bozzi, Stefano Catani, Daniel de Florian, Massimiliano Grazzini, Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC. Nucl. Phys. B 737, 73–120 (2006)
Wojciech Bizon, Pier Francesco Monni, Emanuele Re, Luca Rottoli, Paolo Torrielli, Momentum-space resummation for transverse observables and the Higgs \(p_\perp \) at \(\text{ N }^3\text{ LL+NNLO }\). (2017)
Bo Andersson et al., Small x phenomenology: Summary and status. Eur. Phys. J. C 25, 77–101 (2002)
Jeppe R. Andersen et al., Small x phenomenology: Summary and status. Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 67–98 (2004)
Jeppe R. Andersen et al., Small x Phenomenology: Summary of the 3rd Lund Small x Workshop in 2004. Eur. Phys. J. C 48, 53–105 (2006)
E.A. Kuraev, L .N. Lipatov, Victor S Fadin, Multi - Reggeon Processes in the Yang-Mills Theory. Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 443–450 (1976)
E.A. Kuraev, L .N. Lipatov, Victor S Fadin, Multi - Reggeon Processes in the Yang-Mills Theory. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 71,840 (1976)
E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov, Victor S Fadin, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories. Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 199–204 (1977)
E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov, Victor S. Fadin, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 72,377 (1977)
I.I. Balitsky, L.N. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28, 822–829 (1978)
I.I. Balitsky, L.N. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk Singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics. Yad. Fiz. 28, 1597 (1978)
L.V. Gribov, E.M. Levin, M.G. Ryskin, Semihard Processes in QCD. Phys. Rept. 100, 1–150 (1983)
E.M. Levin, M.G. Ryskin, YuM Shabelski, A.G. Shuvaev, Heavy quark production in semihard nucleon interactions. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 53, 657 (1991)
E.M. Levin, M.G. Ryskin, YuM Shabelski, A.G. Shuvaev, Heavy quark production in semihard nucleon interactions. Yad. Fiz. 53, 1059 (1991)
S. Catani, M. Ciafaloni, F. Hautmann, GLUON CONTRIBUTIONS TO SMALL x HEAVY FLAVOR PRODUCTION. Phys. Lett. B 242, 97–102 (1990)
S. Catani, M. Ciafaloni, F. Hautmann, High-energy factorization and small x heavy flavor production. Nucl. Phys. B 366, 135–188 (1991)
John C Collins, R.Keith Ellis, Heavy quark production in very high-energy hadron collisions. Nucl. Phys. B360, 3–30 (1991)
Marcello Ciafaloni, Coherence Effects in Initial Jets at Small \(q^2 / s\). Nucl. Phys. B 296, 49–74 (1988)
S. Catani, F. Fiorani, G. Marchesini, QCD Coherence in Initial State Radiation. Phys. Lett. B 234, 339–345 (1990)
S. Catani, F. Fiorani, G. Marchesini, Small x Behavior of Initial State Radiation in Perturbative QCD. Nucl. Phys. B 336, 18–85 (1990)
Giuseppe Marchesini, QCD coherence in the structure function and associated distributions at small x. Nucl. Phys. B 445, 49–80 (1995)
L.N. Lipatov, M.I. Vyazovsky, QuasimultiRegge processes with a quark exchange in the t channel. Nucl. Phys. B 597, 399–409 (2001)
A.V. Bogdan, V.S. Fadin, A Proof of the reggeized form of amplitudes with quark exchanges. Nucl. Phys. B 740, 36–57 (2006)
Martin Hentschinski, Pole prescription of higher order induced vertices in Lipatov’s QCD effective action. Nucl. Phys. B 859, 129–142 (2012)
G. Chachamis, M. Hentschinski, J.D. Madrigal Martinez, ASabio Vera, Quark contribution to the gluon Regge trajectory at NLO from the high energy effective action. Nucl. Phys. B861, 133–144 (2012)
Martin Hentschinski, Agustin Sabio Vera, NLO jet vertex from Lipatov’s QCD effective action. Phys. Rev. D 85, 056006 (2012)
L.N. Lipatov, Gauge invariant effective action for high-energy processes in QCD. Nucl. Phys. B 452, 369–400 (1995)
L.N. Lipatov, Small x physics in perturbative QCD. Phys. Rept. 286, 131–198 (1997)
A.V. Lipatov, M.A. Malyshev, Reconsideration of the inclusive prompt photon production at the LHC with \(k_T\)-factorization. Phys. Rev. D 94(3), 034020 (2016)
A.V. Lipatov, N.P. Zotov, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in the \(k_T\)-factorization approach. Eur. Phys. J. C 44, 559–566 (2005)
A.V. Lipatov, M.A. Malyshev, N.P. Zotov, Phenomenology of \(k_t\)-factorization for inclusive Higgs boson production at LHC. Phys. Lett. B 735, 79–83 (2014)
N.A. Abdulov, A.V. Lipatov, M.A. Malyshev, Inclusive Higgs boson production at the LHC in the kt-factorization approach. Phys. Rev. D 97(5), 054017 (2018)
Georges Aad et al., Fiducial and differential cross sections of Higgs boson production measured in the four-lepton decay channel in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=8\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Lett. B 738, 234–253 (2014)
Vardan Khachatryan et al., Measurement of differential and integrated fiducial cross sections for Higgs boson production in the four-lepton decay channel in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) and 8 TeV. JHEP 04, 005 (2016)
Morad Aaboud et al., Measurement of inclusive and differential cross sections in the \(H \rightarrow ZZ^* \rightarrow 4\ell \) decay channel in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=13\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. JHEP 10, 132 (2017)
Hannes Jung, Un-integrated PDFs in CCFM. in Deep inelastic scattering. Proceedings, 12th International Workshop, DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso, Slovakia, April 14-18, 2004. Vol. 1 + 2, pages 299–302, (2004)
John R. Ellis, Mary K. Gaillard, Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, A Phenomenological Profile of the Higgs Boson. Nucl. Phys. B 106, 292 (1976)
Mikhail A Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, M.B. Voloshin, Valentin I Zakharov, Low-Energy Theorems for Higgs Boson Couplings to Photons. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30, 711–716 (1979)
Mikhail A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, M. B. Voloshin, Valentin I. Zakharov, Low-Energy Theorems for Higgs Boson Couplings to Photons. Yad. Fiz. 30,1368 (1979)
F. Hautmann, H. Jung, Transverse momentum dependent gluon density from DIS precision data. Nucl. Phys. B 883, 1–19 (2014)
S. Dooling, F. Hautmann, H. Jung, Hadroproduction of electroweak gauge boson plus jets and TMD parton density functions. Phys. Lett. B 736, 293–298 (2014)
F. Hautmann, H. Jung, M. Krmer, P.J. Mulders, E.R. Nocera, T.C. Rogers, A. Signori, TMDlib and TMDplotter: library and plotting tools for transverse-momentum-dependent parton distributions. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3220 (2014)
Patrick L.S. Connor, Hannes Jung, Francesco Hautmann, Johannes Scheller, TMDlib 1.0.8 and TMDplotter 2.1.1. PoS DIS2016, 039 (2016)
A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne, G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 189–285 (2009)
Charalampos Anastasiou, Stephan Buehler, Franz Herzog, Achilleas Lazopoulos, Inclusive Higgs boson cross-section for the LHC at 8 TeV. JHEP 04, 004 (2012)
H. Jung et al., The CCFM Monte Carlo generator CASCADE version 2.2.03. Eur. Phys. J. C70, 1237–1249 (2010)
Massimiliano Grazzini, Hayk Sargsyan, Heavy-quark mass effects in Higgs boson production at the LHC. JHEP 09, 129 (2013)
F. Hautmann, Heavy top limit and double logarithmic contributions to Higgs production at \(m_H^2 / s \ll 1\). Phys. Lett. B 535, 159–162 (2002)
M.G. Ryskin, A.G. Shuvaev, YuM Shabelski, Charm hadroproduction in \(k_T\)-factorization approach. Phys. Atom. Nucl. 64, 120–131 (2001)
G. Watt, A.D. Martin, M.G. Ryskin, Unintegrated parton distributions and electroweak boson production at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev., D70, 014012, (2004). [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D70,079902(2004)]
Antoni Szczurek, Marta Luszczak, Rafal Maciula, Inclusive production of Higgs boson in the two-photon channel at the LHC within \(k_{t}\)-factorization approach and with the Standard Model couplings. Phys. Rev. D 90(9), 094023 (2014)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to extend their sincere gratitude to V. Ravindran for continuous support and fruitful discussions during the course of this work and A. Lipatov for providing their codes of a similar study for diphoton distributions. VR would like to thank Giancarlo Ferrera for useful discussions on HRes tool and related topics. RI would also like to acknowledge the hospitality provided by the Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India where a part of the work has been done. RI would like to thank the DST-FIST grant SR/FST/PSIl-020/2009 for support
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendices
A Amplitude of \(g^*\!g^*\!\rightarrow \!h\!\rightarrow \!ZZ^*\!\rightarrow \!4\ell \)
In this appendix, we give details of our calculations that went into our analysis. Figure 1 shows the assignment of the momenta. In the limit of large top quark mass \(m_t \rightarrow \infty \), the effective Lagrangian for the Higgs boson coupling to gluons given in Eq. (1) can be written as
where v is the vacuum expectation value of the scalar field. The amplitude of the process \(g^*\!g^*\!\rightarrow \!h\!\rightarrow \!ZZ^*\!\rightarrow \!\ell \bar{\ell }\ell ^\prime \bar{\ell }^\prime \) is
where
where
Hence we shall denote them only by \(g_L\) and \(g_R\) hereafter.
Now using the above expressions into Eq. (9) we can get \(\overline{|\mathcal{M}|^2}\) for the process as
where
whereas
To calculate the gluon part of the above amplitude we use the Sudakov decomposition of momenta as followed in Ref. [45, 46]. Accordingly, we can write the gluon momenta \(k_{1,2}\) as
In the above equation, \(k_{1\perp ,2\perp }\) are vectors transverse to the momenta \(P_{1,2}\) of the incoming hadrons. It is convenient to take both \(P_{1,2}\) to be light-like (i.e. \(P^2_{1,2} = 0\)). Because of this, \(P_{1,2}\) are slightly different from the actual momenta of the incoming hadrons. Let us take \(P_{1,2}\) to be as follows
where \(\sqrt{S}\) is the center of mass energy of the hadrons. In the high energy limit, the introduction of strong ordering in longitudinal momenta gives
Therefore using Eqs. (17) and (18) we get
In the last step, we have used the definition of \(k_{1\perp ,2\perp }\) introduced in Eq. (16).
With the help of the above expressions, we are now ready to calculate the gluon part of Eq. (15). Using the polarization sum for the off-shell gluons given by
we can calculate
Therefore putting the expression of Eq. (22) into Eq. (15) we get the total spin averaged squared amplitude of the process \(g^*\!g^*\!\rightarrow \!h\!\rightarrow \!ZZ^*\!\rightarrow \!\ell \bar{\ell }\ell ^\prime \bar{\ell }^\prime \) as
Phase space calculation
In this appendix, we give details of the phase space calculations related to our analysis. Let us express the 4-momentum p in a 3-component vector in terms of the transverse momentum \(\mathbf{p}_T\) and the rapidity y as follows
where the transverse energy \(E_T = \sqrt{\mathbf{p}^2_T + m^2}\) and m is the mass. We can write the measure of the phase space integration as
Let us further express the 4-momentum p in a 4-component vector in terms of \(p_T (\equiv |\mathbf{p}_T|)\), y and the azimuthal angle \(\varphi \) as
Now the measure of integration over the phase space becomes
The above can be easily understood if we express the 2-component vector \(\mathbf{p}_T\) in polar coordinates \((p_T \cos \varphi , p_T \sin \varphi )\). Then we can write \(d^2\mathbf{p}_T = p_T dp_T d\varphi \).
Now let us turn our attention to the phase space integration of a 4-body final state process in a hadron collider. The hadronic cross section in the \(k_T\)-factorization approach for the off-shell hard scattering amplitude of appendix A is (see Eq. 2.1 of Ref. [80])
Introducing the azimuthal angles \(\varphi _{1,2}\) of the off-shell gluons into Eq. (28) we can write the gluon phase space as
Let us write the 4-momenta of the partons, using Eq. (18), as
Here \(z_1 \rightarrow x_1\) and \({\bar{z}}_2 \rightarrow x_2\). Also the 4-momenta of the leptons are
Using the above designation of the gluon and lepton momenta we can simplify the delta function of Eq. (28) as
Putting the results from Eqs. (29) and (32) into Eq. (28) and integrating over \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) we get
where
Now integration over \(\mathbf{p}_{4\perp }\) in Eq. (33) gives us
In the last step above we have used \(d^2\mathbf{p}_{f\perp } = 2\pi p_{f\perp } dp_{f\perp } = \pi d\mathbf{p}^2_{f\perp }, (f=1,2,3)\).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Funded by SCOAP3.
About this article
Cite this article
Islam, R., Kumar, M. & Rawoot, V. \(k_T\)-factorization approach to the Higgs boson production in \(ZZ^*\rightarrow 4\ell \) channel at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 181 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6663-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6663-1