Skip to main content
Log in

Is the upgrading of wastewater treatment facilities to meet more stringent standards economically justified: The case of Israel

  • Water Quality and Protection: Environmental Aspects
  • Published:
Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The global use of wastewater for irrigation in agriculture is increasing, as are the requirements for more stringent wastewater treatment standards, to prevent environmental and health risks. The aim of this paper is to display a cost-benefit analysis of introducing more stringent standards for wastewater treatment in Israel, and to examine whether upgrading the wastewater treatment facilities is economically justified. The findings indicate that the introduction of the stringent standards as well as upgrading the treatment facilities are economically justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adan Technologies Report, 2001: The benefits of using saltwater through dilution with desalinated seawater from the Ashkelon desalination plant, 2001.

  2. Aiello, R., Cirelli, G.L., and Consoli, S., Effects of reclaimed wastewater irrigation on soil and tomato fruits: a case study in sicily (Italy), Agricultural Water Management, 2007, vol. 93, nos. 1–2, pp. 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahri, A., Agricultural reuse of wastewater and global water management, Water Sci. Technol., 1999, vol. 40, nos. 4–5, pp. 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. European Commission, 2008: Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects, http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/cost/guide2008_en.pdf.

  5. Feinerman, E., Crop density and irrigation with saline water, Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1983, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedler, E., Water reuse—an integral part of water resources management: Israel as a case study, Water Policy, 2001, vol. 3, pp. 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadas, A., Tarchitzky, J., and Fine, Z., Forecast of Water Use in Agriculture by Water Quality and Region, Israel Ministry of Agriculture, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haruvy, N., Agricultural reuse of wastewater: nationwide cost-benefit analysis, Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 1997, vol. 66, pp. 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haruvy, N., Wastewater reuse—regional and economic considerations, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 1998, vol. 23, pp. 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haruvy, N. and Sadan, E., Cost benefit analysis of wastewater treatment in the water scarce economy of Israel: a case study, J. Financial Management and Analysis, 1994, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haruvy, N., Shalhevet, S., and Bachmat, Y., A model for integrated water resources management in water-scarce regions: irrigation with wastewater combined with desalination processes, Int. J. Water, 2008, vol. 4, pp. 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haruvy, N., Shalhevet, S., and Ravina, I., Irrigation with treated wastewater in Israel—financial and managerial analysis, J. Financial Management and Analysis, 2004, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haruvy, N., Shalhevet, S., and Yaron, D., Effect of urban development on water quality—environmental concern, International Water and Irrigation, 2001, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Inbar, Y., New standards for treated wastewater reuse in Israel, in Wastewater Reuse—Risk Assessment, Decision-Making and Environmental Security, Zaidi, M.K., Ed., Session 8, 2007, pp. 291–296.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2005: Disposal of reclaimed water for irrigation, http://www.sviva.gov.il/bin/en.jsp?enPage=BlankPage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=Object&enDispWho=Articals l730&enZone=waste_discharge.

  16. Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2008: The path towards sustainable development in Israel, http://www.sviva.gov.il/Enviroment/Static/Binaries/ModulKvatzim/p0463-2.pdf.

  17. Lavee, D., A cost-benefit analysis of alternative waste-water treatment standards: a case study in Israel, Water Environ. J., 2011, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 504–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leal, R.M.P., Herpin, U., da Fonseca, A.F., Firme, L.P., Montes, C.R., and Melfi, A.J., Sodicity and salinity in a Brazilian oxisol cultivated with sugarcane irrigated with wastewater, Agricultural Water Management, 2009, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Molinos-Senante, M., Hernández-Sancho, F., and Sala-Garrido, R., Cost-benefit analysis of water-reuse projects for environmental purposes: a case study for Spanish wastewater treatment plants, J. Environ. Manage., 2011, vol. 92, pp. 3091–3097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pales, A.M., Pasquale, V., Celano, G., Figliuolo, G., Masi, S., and Xioyannis, C., Irrigation of olive groves in Southern Italy with treated municipal wastewater: effects on microbiological quality of soil and fruits, Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 2009, vol. 129, nos. 1–3, pp. 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pareto-Engineering Report, Final Report of the Committee for Establishing Wastewater Treatment Standards, 2003, http://old.sviva.gov.il/Enviroment/Static/Binaries/index_pirsumim/p0321_1.pdf.

  22. Scheierling, S.M., Bartone, C., Mara, D.D., and Drechsel, P., Improving Wastewater Use in Agriculture: An Emerging Priority, Policy Research Working Paper no. WPS 5412, Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van der Bruggen, B., Goossens, H., Everard, P.A., Stemgee, K., and Rogge, W., Cost-benefit analysis of central softening for production of drinking water, J. Environ. Manage., 2009, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 541–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Winpenny, J.T., Heinz, I., and Koo-Oshima, S., The Wealth of Waste: The Economics of Wastewater Use in Agriculture, Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Lavee.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lavee, D. Is the upgrading of wastewater treatment facilities to meet more stringent standards economically justified: The case of Israel. Water Resour 41, 564–573 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807814050042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807814050042

Keywords

Navigation