Skip to main content
Log in

Europe, a smart power?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smart power is defined as the effective combination of both hard and soft power. The concept is increasingly used in policy and academic debates, yet a clear understanding of what it actually means is still lacking. As a result, there is little serious consideration of how smart power can contribute to long-standing debates about power in international relations. This article seeks to clarify the meaning of smart power through first analyzing its main components – hard and soft power – separately; and second bringing these components together to re-conceptualize smart power. The aim is to make smart power more analytically useful, and to outline the various ways in which hard and soft power can be combined effectively. The author considers the case of Europe to argue that it is mainly a soft power and sometimes a smart power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. S. Nossel first coined the term (2004).

  2. As an aside, the use of the label ‘smart power’ is arbitrary – it could just as easily be called ‘hybrid power’ or something else – but I contend that that there is value in trying to create bridges to the policy world and to policy language.

References

  • Armitage, R. and Nye, J. (2007) CSIS Commission on Smart Power: A Smarter More Secure America. Washington DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. (2005) Power and international relations. In: W. Carlsnaes (ed.) Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull, N.J. (ed.) (2009) Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. In: CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy. Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. (2010) Europe's Promise: Why the European Way Is the Best Hope in an Insecure Age. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, T. (2006) Hard Power, Soft Power and the Future of the Transatlantic Relationship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. and Nye, J (2000) Globalization: What's new? What's not? (And so what?). Foreign Policy 118 (Spring): 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laïdi, Z. (2008) Norms over Force: The Enigma of European Power. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2005) Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2006) Normative power Europe reconsidered: Beyond the crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 182–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattern, J. (2007) Why ‘soft power’ isn’t so soft: Representational force and attraction in world politics. In: F. Berenskoetter and M.J. Williams (eds.) Power in World Politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, J. (2006) The European Superpower. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, J. (2010) Europeanism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2010) Europe: The second superpower. Current History 109 (725): 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, P. (2009) Hillary Clinton says ‘smart power’ will restore American leadership. The Times 13 January.

  • Nossel, S. (2004) Smart power. Foreign Affairs 83 (2): 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2004) Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2007) Notes for a soft-power research agenda. In: F. Berenskoetter and M.J. Williams (eds.) Power in World Politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2008) The Powers to Lead. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2009a) Get smart: Combining hard and soft power. Foreign Affairs 88 (4): 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2009b) Smart power. New Perspectives Quarterly 26 (2): 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2011) The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, T.R. (2005) The United States of Europe: The New Superpower and the End of American Supremacy. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettman, A. (2011) EU institutions hit back at markets, ratings agencies. euobserver.com, 20 October, doi: http://euobserver.com/19/113999.

  • Risse, T. (2010) A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. (2005) Realist conceptions of power. In: F. Berenskoetter and M.J. Williams (eds.) Power in World Politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (2008) Hard power, soft power, smart power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cross, M. Europe, a smart power?. Int Polit 48, 691–706 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.28

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.28

Keywords

Navigation