Abstract
A new technique for promoting nucleation and growth of membrane protein (MP) crystals from micellar environments is reported. It relies on the conjugation of micelles that sequester MPs in protein detergent complexes (PDCs). Conjugation via amphiphilic [metal:chelator] complexes presumably takes place at the micelle/water interface, thereby bringing the PDCs into proximity, promoting crystal nucleation and growth. We have successfully applied this approach to two light-driven proton pumps: bacteriorhodopsin (bR) and the recently discovered King Sejong 1–2 (KS1–2), using the amphiphilic 4,4′-dinonyl-2,2′-dipyridyl (Dinonyl) (0.7 mM) chelator in combination with Zn2+, Fe2+, or Ni2+ (0.1 mM). Crystal growth in the presence of the [metal–chelator] complexes leads to purple, hexagonal crystals (50–75 µm in size) of bR or pink, rectangular/square crystals (5–15 µm) of KS1–2. The effects of divalent cation identity and concentration, chelator structure and concentration, ionic strength and pH on crystal size, morphology and process kinetics, are described.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Membrane proteins (MPs) constitute ~ 23% of the human proteome1. They are responsible for active and passive transport, energy transduction and signalling, and when malfunctioning, for diverse forms of human pathology2,3,4,5. Membrane proteins therefore represent major targets for biochemical studies and drug development6,7,8,9 for which high resolution structure determination of MPs is essential.
MPs form both two dimensional (2D) and three dimensional (3D) crystals. 2D crystals are generally formed by inserting purified, protein detergent complexes (PDCs) into lipid bilayers10. However, 3D crystals have been the major source of high-resolution structure determination. 3D MP crystals are commonly subdivided into two groups: Type I—where MPs are organized in planar sheets, through protein–detergent–lipid hydrophobic interactions, stacked on top of one another by polar interactions; and Type II 3D crystals—generated by PDC assembly11,12. Recent surveys have shown that the majority of high-quality 3D crystals are Type II12,13. Despite recent technical advances, including: (a) overexpression of MPs in diverse hosts14,15,16; (b) development of novel detergents and lipids that improve MP extraction from their native membranes17,18; (c) automation and miniaturization of crystallization trials19 and (d) improvement of X-ray sources and reduction of radiation damage20, obtaining high quality, 3D single crystals of MPs nevertheless remains one of the most significant challenges facing structural biologists.
Since the introduction of lipidic cubic phases in 1996 by Landau and Rosenbusch21 no conceptually new pathway to MP crystallization from micellar environments has been introduced. In our work, we have focused on the possibility of promoting crystal nucleation and growth by exploiting the physical chemistry of the detergent component in PDCs. Until now, detergent micelles have primarily served as a shield against membrane protein aggregation in aqueous solution and/or as a stabilizing environment. However, we have found that it is possible to exploit the micellar moiety for a new objective, i.e., directing PDCs to assemble via specifically conjugated micelles under controlled conditions. Such an objective builds on recent studies that have shown how a variety of amphiphilic [metal:chelator] complexes presumably located at the micelle/water interface, are able to promote large-scale micellar conjugation22,23. Here we demonstrate that successful implementation of this approach on PDCs (outlined in the cartoon in Fig. 1) leads to the crystallization of the light driven proton pumps: bacteriorhodopsin (bR) and the recently discovered King Sejong 1–2 (KS1–2).
Results
Conjugating empty, non-ionic β-d-1-octylthioglucoside (OTG) micelles
Non-ionic β-d-1-thioglucoside (OTG) micelles, devoid of MPs, were conjugated via the amphiphilic chelator 4,4′-dinonyl-2,2′-dipyridyl (Dinonyl) in association with divalent metal cations: Zn2+, Fe2+, or Ni2+. Each cation is able to bind Dinonyl at a molar ratio of 1:3, respectively [(Dinonyl)3:M2+]24 (Fig. 2). Micellar conjugation was indeed found to be efficient with each of the three cations studied and led within 60 min to macroscopic phase separation in the form of oil-rich globules (Fig. 2A). In the absence of the cations, the chelators precipitated as elongated threads (Fig. 2A, left) and in the absence of the Dinonyl chelator, but retaining the same cation concentration, no phase separation was observed (Fig. 2B).
Conjugating membrane protein-containing OTG/phospholipid mixed micelles
The conjugation of empty OTG micelles paved the way to assessing this approach with PDCs containing bR, native phospholipids and OTG (Fig. 3). The PDCs had been obtained by dissociating purple membranes with OTG (see “Methods” section) and validating that the characteristic bR absorption spectrum had been preserved (online Supplementary Information, Figure S1). With the availability of micellar preparations containing native bR, the effects of three divalent cations (Fe2+, Co2+, Cd2+) on the efficiency of conjugation were studied (online Supplementary Information, Figure S2). We found that the [(Dinonyl)3:Zn2+] complex successfully conjugated micellar aggregates and generated large purple oil-rich globules (20–100 µm) after 1 day of incubation in the dark at 19 °C (Fig. 3A). Control experiments in the absence of Zn2+, demonstrated the contribution of Zn2+ ions to the conjugation process. Without Zn2+, globules reached a maximal size of ~ 30 µm and were significantly less purple, indicating a lower bR concentration within the globule (Fig. 3D, upper right image). The fact that globules form upon introduction of the Dinonyl chelator, but without zinc ions, is likely due to the presence of the ammonium sulfate (AS) precipitant. The latter, like many other precipitants commonly used in macromolecular crystallization protocols (e.g. PEGs), compete with solutes in the system for binding to water molecules and by so doing, reduce their water-solubility. This holds true also for hydrated PDCs which, upon introduction of AS, are dehydrated and this in turn leads to their clustering and fusion into stable oil-rich, purple globules as shown in Fig. 3D.
Growth of type II 3-dimensional bR crystals via [(Dinonyl)3:Zn2+] conjugated OTG-phospholipid mixed micelles
After 15 days incubation of the bR-containing conjugated PDCs in the dark at 19 °C, a mixture of dark precipitates combined with larger purple globules (150 µm) were visible (Fig. 3B) and after 60 days, thin, hexagonal crystals (10–50 µm) appeared (Fig. 3C). Control experiments under identical conditions but without the Dinonyl chelator demonstrated that Zn2+ ions (0.1 mM) on their own do not promote crystal growth (not shown).
Growth of 3-dimensional bR crystals in [(Dinonyl)3:Ni2+] conjugated OTG/phospholipid mixed micelles
Exchanging Ni2+ ions for Zn2+ produced similar crystal growth (Fig. 4). Hexagonal thin, purple-colored crystals reached their largest size (~ 70–75 µm) with Ni2+ concentration 0.05–0.1 mM (Fig. 4). However, at higher Ni2+ concentration (5 mM), no crystals were observed. Though a tendency to crystal stacking was observed with 0.1 mM Ni2+ ions as well as Zn2+ ions, at lower Ni2+ concentration (0.05 mM) this tendency was suppressed. Moreover, cation identity appeared to modify process kinetics. More rapid crystal growth was observed with Ni2+ ions (22 days) as compared to Zn2+ ions (40–60 days) under identical conditions. Attempts to crystallize bR with other cations known to bind Dinonyl at the same molar ratio (1:3, respectively24), i.e., Fe2+, Co2+ or Cd2+ failed to produce any crystals.
Chelator structure and growth of bR crystals
Other parameters that were expected to affect crystal growth included chelator structure and concentration, molarity of NaCl and pH. The chemical structure of the Dinonyl chelator is available in Fig. 3. Repetition of the crystallization protocol with a Dinonyl analog, 4,4′-diphenyl-2,2′-dipyridyl (Diphenyl), did promote crystallization of bR (Supplementary Information, Figure S3). However, the crystals were smaller (max. 20 µm) and were not hexagonal (online Supplementary Information, Figure S3). Changing the Dinonyl concentration at constant Ni2+ concentration (0.1 mM), revealed a dramatic effect (online Supplementary Information, Figure S4). With 0.175 mM Dinonyl, hexagonal purple crystals grew within 21 days, whereas with 1 mM Dinonyl, no crystals were observed at all, even after 60 days (Figure S4, inset). An additional important parameter was found to be NaCl concentration. The largest crystals grew in the presence of 100 mM NaCl. With 20 mM NaCl, there were few crystals and they exhibited a globular morphology. With 50 mM NaCl, numerous small (5–15 µm) crystals appeared. However, with 500 mM NaCl, crystal growth was abolished (online Supplementary Information, Figure S5). The pH (5.2) of the hanging drop was a constant: higher or lower pH values failed to promote crystallization (not shown).
Crystallization of KS1–2
Our protocol was also tested on KS1–2, a recently identified 255 amino acid membrane protein26 (Fig. 5). KS1–2 functions as a light-driven proton pump rhodopsin bound covalently to the retinal chromophore. Since KS1–2 pigment absorbs in the green–blue region of the visible spectrum (λmax 517 nm) the proteins appear orange\purple-red in white light and pink crystals were accordingly expected. The MP was purified with DDM as the detergent (see “Methods” section) and pink rectangular/square crystals (5–15 µm) appeared only in the presence of the [(Dinonyl)3:Zn2+] complex and with the same metal (0.1 mM) and chelator (0.7 mM) concentrations used for bR (Fig. 3). After 8 days, crystals reached their maximum size. They appear to be either fused to each other (Fig. 5A, left) or independent (Fig. 5A, right) but no crystals were seen in the absence of Zn2+ ions (Fig. 5A, right, inset). Na citrate buffer, pH 5.2 was the same as used for bR; however, the precipitant was PEG-4000, rather than ammonium sulfate (AS). The [(Dinonyl)3:Fe2+] complex also produced fused, square pink KS1–2 crystals (Fig. 5B, left) as well as crystals with a different morphology (Fig. 5B, right). Use of the [(Dinonyl)3:Ni2+] complex led to significantly smaller, fused crystals (Fig. 5C, left), although a few diamond-shaped single crystals (5–10 µm) were also observed (Fig. 5C, right).
Discussion
Three-dimensional, high resolution crystal structures are seriously lacking for intrinsic membrane proteins (MPs). Detergent micelle environments for MPs during crystallization trials currently represent the most popular and convenient “playground” for structural biologists; nevertheless, crystallization of MPs, particularly those with small hydrophilic loop regions, remains an unpredictable, fine art.
Two lines of evidence imply that observed crystals are comprised of the target membrane proteins: (a) No crystals of any type were observed when target membrane proteins (bR or KS1–2) were absent in the crystallization drops. (b) Interestingly, the observation of hexagonal purple bR crystals in this study was already observed with well-established crystallization strategies. Purple hexagonal bR crystals grew from lipid cubic phases21,27 and from the “successive fusion vesicle” strategy28. However, diamond shaped purple bR crystals, grew from bicelles29.
Investigating the possibility of bringing protein detergent complexes (PDCs) into proximity via specific micellar conjugation led to two very encouraging findings. First, crystals of target proteins (bR or KS1–2) grew only in the presence of both the chelator (Dinonyl) and appropriate metal cations. The mandatory dependence of crystal growth on these two additives is consistent with our working hypothesis, demonstrates process specificity, and the existence of a simple chemical mechanism capable of promoting crystallization. That these crystals contain native, chromophore-containing, target membrane proteins is supported by the fact that no crystals of any type were observed when MPs (bR or KS1–2) were absent from the crystallization drops. Since it is known that a change in the chromophore conformation (or its hydrolysis from the protein) leads to the loss of color, color-preservation serves as an internal indicator for the presence of the protein’s native state within the crystal. Second, once the optimal concentrations of chelator and metal had been successfully determined, crystallization was observed in > 80% of the hanging drops in each of > 10 independent trials. Such high process reproducibility may not be common in other MP crystallization protocols and demonstrates the efficiency and robust character of our approach.
Our strategy for crystallizing MPs, based on large-scale conjugation of PDCs, demonstrates several important advantages in comparison with the variety of procedures already in use by structural biologists30,31,32. These advantages include: (i) Covalent modifications, e.g. amino acid “tags”, are not required; crystallization trials of PDCs can proceed directly from optimized expression and purification of the protein under study. (ii) Concentrations of cations (0.1 mM) and amphiphilic chelator (0.7 mM), adequate for producing micelle conjugation, are sufficiently low that the native states of the MPs studied (bR and KS1–2) appear to be preserved. (iii) PDCs may contain either non-ionic detergents (e.g. DDM in the case of KS1–2) or negatively charged mixed micelles (native phospholipids + OTG) as in the case of bR. (iv) Our strategy is sufficiently flexible to permit a wide range of working conditions. The Dinonyl chelator remains functional under both acidic or basic conditions. In this study, the chelator was found to be usable after 60 days at pH 5.2. (v). The low cost and commercial availability of all components, in particular the Dinonyl chelator, facilitate rational screening of diverse MPs. The chelator and divalent metal cation are simply added to the micelle dispersion as with any other additive. Furthermore, no special instrumentation is needed. Though the crystals obtained were too small to permit structure determination by X-ray diffraction, we are encouraged by the fact that color was preserved (purple for bR and pink for KS1-2), indicating that the MP’s active site had not been distorted. Slow progress in obtaining high quality crystals of MPs remains a major bottleneck in drug design; to alleviate this problem, it will be necessary to apply as many innovative approaches as possible. We trust that our strategy will aid in overcoming this problem.
Methods
Materials
All-trans retinal, ammonium sulfate, ampicillin, DNase, isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), octyl β-d-1-thioglucoside (OTG), decyl β-d-maltoside (DM), dodecyl β-d-maltoside (DDM), ethanol, imidazole, lysozyme, MgCl2, 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid, (MES), NaCl, NaN3, Na citrate, polyethylene glycol 4000 (PEG-4000), FeSO4, NiBr2, ZnCl2, CoSO4, CdCl2, 4,4′-dinonyl-2,2′-dipyridyl (Dinonyl) and 4,4′-diphenyl-2,2′-dipyridyl (Diphenyl) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Conjugation of octyl β-d-1-thioglucoside (OTG) micelles
Into 53 µL of DDW, 120 µL of 100 mM OTG (in DDW) and 27 µL of 15 mM Dinonyl (in EtOH) were added with vigorous vortexing. Equal volumes (e.g. 1.5 µL) of the chelator/OTG mixture and a medium containing 6 mM of either FeSO4, NiBr2 or ZnCl2 in 400 mM NaCl were added. Drops (e.g. 3 µL) were placed on siliconized cover-slides (VDX™ crystallization plates, Hampton Research) and incubated for 1 h at 19 °C in the dark against reservoirs containing 200 mM NaCl.
Preparation of purple membranes
Halobacterium salinarum was grown from the S9 strain and purple membranes containing bacteriorhodopsin (bR) were isolated as previously described25.
Expression and purification of King Sejong 1–2 KS1–2 were prepared according to Ghosh et al.26
Codon optimized KS1–2 was expressed in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells. E. coli transformant was grown to OD (λ600) = 0.8 in the presence of ampicillin (50 μg mL−1) at 37 °C. The cells were then induced with 0.1% IPTG (isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside) and 10 μM all-trans retinal for 8 h. Pink-colored cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4 °C, followed by resuspension with buffer I (50 mM 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid, (MES), 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, 5 mM MgCl2; pH 6) containing 1% DDM (n-dodecyl-β-d-maltoside) and lysed with lysozyme (0.1 mg mL−1) in the presence of DNase and a protease inhibitor. The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The extracted protein was collected as a supernatant after centrifugation of the stirred solution at 18,000 rpm and 4 °C for 30 min. The protein was purified using a Ni2+ NTA histidine-tagged agarose column. The histidine-tagged protein was washed with buffer II (50 mM MES, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM imidazole, 0.06% DDM; pH 6) and eluted with buffer III (0.06% DDM, 50 mM Tris–HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM HCl, 150 mM imidazole; pH 7.5). The eluted protein was washed and concentrated using a 0.02% DDM solution using Amicon ultra centrifugal filter devices. The final KS1-2 was kept in 0.06% DDM.
Solubilization of purple membranes with OTG
Into 15 µL of purple membranes (OD 14) in DDW, 8.5 µL of 100 mM octylthioglucoside (OTG), 7.1 µL of 0.5 M Na citrate (pH 5.2) and 40 µL of DDW were added to a total volume of 71 µL. The system was incubated for 3 h at 19 °C in the dark, followed by a short spin (15,000 rpm, 10 min, 19 °C). The resulting transparent purple supernatant was used immediately for crystallization trials.
Optical absorption of bR and KS1–2 with and without the [(Dinonyl)3:Ni2+] complex
The absorption spectrum of bR extracted from its native purple membrane with OTG (as described above) was measured (Figure S6, A). The characteristic absorption of native bR at 565–568 nm was preserved when the amphiphilic chelator (Dinonyl), the metal (Ni2+) or both were added and incubated for up to 24 h at 19 °C in the dark (Figure S2, A). However, a decrease of ~ 20% in the OD of bR at 565–568 nm was observed after 1 day of incubation in the presence of the [(Dinonyl)3:Ni2+] amphiphilic complex, presumably due to the ability of the latter to trigger bR aggregation. A similar decrease in the OD at 517 nm of KS1-2 in DDM micelles was observed in the presence of the same amphiphilic complex, after 1 day of incubation at 19 °C in the dark (Figure S7, A). However, in this case a shoulder at ~ 476 nm was also observed after 8 h of incubation which did not further change following over-night incubation at 19 °C in the dark (Figure S7, A).
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) of bR and KS1–2 PDC’s
Samples containing either: (i) OTG (12 mM); (ii) bR (0.5–1.0 mg/mL) in OTG (12 mM) or (iii) as in (ii), but with the addition of Dinonyl (0.175 mM) and Ni2+ (0.1 mM) (i.e. the [(Dinonyl)3:Ni2+] amphiphilic chelating complex), were prepared and the intensity-weighted size distributions of PDC’s were determined following 10 min of incubation at room temperature using the auto correlation protocol of the Nanophox instrument (Sympatec GmbH, Germany). An identical analysis protocol was used for samples containing KS1–2 (0.5–1 mg/mL) in DDM (0.06% w\w) with or without the [(Dinonyl)3:Ni2+] amphiphilic complex. The size distributions are shown in Supplementary Figures S6-B and S7-B.
Crystallization of bacteriorhodopsin (bR)
bR was crystallized by the hanging drop method. Into aliquots of 60 µL of freshly prepared OTG solublilized purple membranes, 3 µL of 15 mM Dinonyl (or Diphenyl) in ethanol were added with vigorous vortexing. This medium, containing bR, native phospholipids, OTG and the amphiphilic chelator, was further incubated for 15 min (at 19 °C in the dark) prior to use. Hanging drops (4 µL) contained 2 µL of the protein detergent complex (PDC) preparation and 2 µL containing 0.25–0.75 M ammonium sulfate (AS), 0.1 or 0.5 mM ZnCl2 (or NiBr2), 0–500 mM NaCl, 25–75 mM Na Citrate (pH 5.2) all in DDW and 2.5% ethanol. Drops (4 µL) were placed on siliconized cover-slides (VDX™ crystallization plates, Hampton Research) and incubated at 19 °C in the dark against reservoirs containing 0.5 mL 2–2.5 M AS.
Crystallization of KS1–2
KS1–2 was crystallized by the hanging drop method using a protocol similar to that applied in the case of bR. Into aliquots of 60 µL KS1-2 (OD 3.7) in 0.06% dodecyl maltoside (DDM) and 0.04% NaN3, 3 µL of 15 mM Dinonyl in ethanol were added with vigorous vortexing and incubated for 15 min at 19 °C in the dark. Hanging drops (3 µL) contained 1.5 µL of the KS1–2/DDM/Dinonyl preparation and 1.5 µL containing 5% (w/v) PEG-4000, 0.5 mM ZnCl2, NiBr2 or FeSO4 in 80 mM Na citrate (pH 5.2). Drops were placed on siliconized cover-slides (VDX™ crystallization plates, Hampton Research) and incubated at 19 °C in the dark against reservoirs (0.5 mL) containing 10% (w/v) PEG-4000 in 40 mM Na citrate (pH 5.2).
Light microscopy
Images were obtained using an Olympus CX-40 light microscope equipped with an Olympus U-TV1X-2 digital camera.
UV–visible spectroscopy
Absorption measurements were performed using the HP 8453 UV–Vis spectrophotometer.
References
Uhlén, M. et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347(6220), 1260419–1260419 (2015).
Partridge, A. W., Therien, A. G. & Deber, C. M. Polar mutations in membrane proteins as a biophysical basis for disease. Biopolymers 66(5), 350–358 (2002).
Sanders, C. R. & Myers, J. K. Disease-related misassembly of membrane proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 25–51 (2004).
Hatta, S., Sakamoto, J. & Horio, Y. Ion channels and diseases. Med. Electron. Microsc. 35(3), 117–126 (2002).
Marinko, J. T. et al. Folding and misfolding of human membrane proteins in health and disease: From single molecules to cellular proteostasis. Chem. Rev. 119(9), 5537–5606 (2019).
Yin, H. & Flynn, A. D. Drugging membrane protein interactions. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 18, 51–76 (2016).
Gong, J. et al. Understanding membrane protein drug targets in computational perspective. Curr. Drug Targets 20(5), 551–564 (2019).
Davey, J. G-protein-coupled receptors: New approaches to maximise the impact of GPCRS in drug discovery. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 8(2), 165–170 (2004).
Terstappen, G. C. & Reggiani, A. In silico research in drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 22(1), 23–26 (2001).
Werten, P. J. L. et al. Progress in the analysis of membrane protein structure and function. FEBS Lett. 529(1), 65–72 (2002).
Ostermeier, C. & Michel, H. Crystallization of membrane proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7(5), 697–701 (1997).
Moraes, I., Evans, G., Sanchez-Weatherby, J., Newstead, S. & Stewart, P. D. S. Membrane protein structure determination—The next generation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1838(1 Part A), 78–87 (2014).
Ishchenko, A., Abola, E. E. & Cherezov, V. Crystallization of membrane proteins: An overview. In Protein Crystallography: Methods and Protocols (eds Wlodawer, A. et al.) 117–141 (Springer, New York, 2017).
Wagner, S. et al. Tuning Escherichia coli for membrane protein overexpression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(38), 14371 (2008).
Schlegel, S. et al. Optimizing membrane protein overexpression in the Escherichia coli strain Lemo21(DE3). J. Mol. Biol. 423(4), 648–659 (2012).
Hays, F. A.; Roe-Zurz, Z.; Stroud, R. M. Overexpression and purification of integral membrane proteins in yeast. Chap. 29. In Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 470, pp 695–707 (Academic Press, New York, 2010).
Chae, P. S. et al. Maltose–neopentyl glycol (MNG) amphiphiles for solubilization, stabilization and crystallization of membrane proteins. Nat. Methods 7(12), 1003–1008 (2010).
Privé, G. G. Detergents for the stabilization and crystallization of membrane proteins. Methods 41(4), 388–397 (2007).
Stevens, R. C., Yokoyama, S. & Wilson, I. A. Global efforts in structural genomics. Science 294(5540), 89–92 (2001).
Duke, E. M. H. & Johnson, L. N. Macromolecular crystallography at synchrotron radiation sources: Current status and future developments. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 466(2124), 3421–3452 (2010).
Landau, E. M. & Rosenbusch, J. P. Lipidic cubic phases: A novel concept for the crystallization of membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93(25), 14371–14375 (1996).
Patchornik, G., Wachtel, E., Kesselman, E. & Danino, D. Cryo-TEM structural analysis of conjugated nonionic engineered-micelles. Soft Matter 10(27), 4922–4928 (2014).
Patchornik, G., Namboothiri, I. N. N., Nair, D. K., Wachtel, E. & Persky, R. Tethered non-ionic micelles: A matrix for enhanced solubilization of lipophilic compounds. Soft Matter 8(32), 8456–8463 (2012).
Critical Stability Constants Volume 5 (first supplement): by A E Martell and R M Smith. P 604. Plenum Press, New York and London. 1982 $69.50 ISBN 0-306-41005-2. Biochem. Educ. 11 (4), 143 (1983).
Oesterhelt, D. & Stoeckenius, W. Isolation of the cell membrane of Halobacterium halobium and its fractionation into red and purple membrane. Methods Enzymol. 31, 667–678 (1974).
Ghosh, M., Jung, K. H. & Sheves, M. Protein conformational alterations induced by the retinal excited state in proton and sodium pumping rhodopsins. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 9450–9456 (2019).
Nollert, P., Qui, H., Caffrey, M., Rosenbusch, J. P. & Landau, E. M. Molecular mechanism for the crystallization of bacteriorhodopsin in lipidic cubic phases. FEBS Lett. 504(3), 179–186 (2001).
Takeda, K. et al. A novel three-dimensional crystal of bacteriorhodopsin obtained by successive fusion of the vesicular assemblies. J. Mol. Biol. 283(2), 463–474 (1998).
Faham, S. et al. Crystallization of bacteriorhodopsin from bicelle formulations at room temperature. Protein Sci. 14(3), 836–840 (2005).
Agah, S. & Faham, S. Crystallization of membrane proteins in bicelles. Methods Mol. Biol. 914, 3–16 (2012).
Broecker, J., Eger, T. B. & Ernst, P. O. Crystallogenesis of membrane proteins mediated by polymer-bounded lipid nanodiscs. Structure 25(2), 384–392 (2017).
Caffrey, M. A comprehensive review of the lipid cubic phase or in meso method for crystallizing membrane and soluble proteins and complexes. Acta Crystallogr. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 71(Pt 1), 3–18 (2015).
Acknowledgments
We thank the Kimmelman Center for Biomolecular Structure and Assembly and the Benoziyo Endowment Fund for the Advancement of Science for their generous support of M.S. M.S. holds the Katzir Makineni Chair in Chemistry. G.P. thanks Dr. Orly Dym for helpful discussions and the research authority of Ariel University for their generous support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.V.T performed crystallization trials. M.G. expressed KS1–2. N.F. preparation of bR. J.K.H. isolated and prepared the KS1–2 gene. E.W., M.S. and G.P analyzed and discussed the data.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Van Truong, T., Ghosh, M., Wachtel, E. et al. Promoting crystallization of intrinsic membrane proteins with conjugated micelles. Sci Rep 10, 12199 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68689-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68689-6
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
His1-tagged DM or DDM detergent micelles are reversibly conjugated by nickel ions
Scientific Reports (2023)