Skip to main content
Log in

Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Models of visual processing often include an initial parallel stage that is restricted to relatively low-level features, whereas activation of higher-level object descriptions is generally assumed to require attention1,2,3,4. Here we report that even high-level object representations can be accessed in parallel: in a rapid animal versus non-animal categorization task, both behavioral and electrophysiological data show that human subjects were as fast at responding to two simultaneously presented natural images as they were to a single one. The implication is that even complex natural images can be processed in parallel without the need for sequential focal attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Behavioral results.
Figure 2: Grand average ERPs and associated differential activities.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Treisman, A. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 1295–1306 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolfe, J.M. Vis. Res. 34, 1187–1195 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinchla, R.A. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 43, 711–742 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McElree, B. & Carrasco, M. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 1517–1539 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Potter, M.C. J. Exp. Psychol. [Hum. Learn.] 2, 509–522 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Biederman, I. Science 177, 77–80 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thorpe, S., Fize, D. & Marlot, C. Nature 381, 520–522 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. VanRullen, R. & Thorpe, S.J. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 454–461 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fize, D. et al. Neuroimage 11, 634–643 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schall, J.D. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 33–42 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freedman, D.J., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T. & Miller, E.K. Science 291, 312–316 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sasaki, K., Gemba, H., Nambu, A. & Matsuzaki, R. Neurosci. Res. 18, 249–252 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Duncan, J. Psychol. Rev. 87, 272–300 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chun, M.M. & Potter, M.C. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 109–127 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, F.F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C. & Perona, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (in press).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Cognitique program (COG35 and 35b). Financial support was provided to G.A.R. by a PhD grant from the French Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume A. Rousselet.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rousselet, G., Fabre-Thorpe, M. & Thorpe, S. Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nat Neurosci 5, 629–630 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn866

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn866

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation