Skip to main content
Log in

The role of DNA methylation in setting up chromatin structure during development

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature Genetics

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

DNA methylation inhibits gene expression in animal cells, probably by affecting chromatin structure. Biochemical studies suggest that this process may be mediated by methyl-specific binding proteins that recruit enzymatic machinery capable of locally altering histone modification1. To test whether DNA methylation actually has a role in the assembly of chromatin during normal development, we used cell transfection and a transgene construct genetically programmed to be either methylated or unmethylated in all cell types of the mouse2. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis shows that the presence of DNA methylation brings about the deacetylation of histone H4 and methylation of Lys9 of histone H3 (H3 Lys9) and prevents methylation of Lys4 of histone H3 (H3 Lys4), thus generating a structure identical to that of methylated sequences in the genome. These results indicate that the methylation pattern established in early embryogenesis is profoundly important in setting up the structural profile of the genome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Programmed transgene methylation.
Figure 2: Effect of DNA methylation on histone H4 acetylation.
Figure 3: Effect of DNA methylation on histone H3 modification.
Figure 4: Effect of DNA methylation on histone H1 placement.
Figure 5: Effect of trichostatin A on reporter transgene transcription.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Razin, A. CpG methylation, chromatin structure and gene silencing—a three-way connection. EMBO J. 17, 4905–4908 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegfried, Z. et al. DNA methylation represses transcription in vivo. Nat. Genet. 22, 203–206 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kafri, T. et al. Developmental pattern of gene-specific DNA methylation in the mouse embryo and germline. Genes Dev. 6, 705–714 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Monk, M., Boubelik, M. & Lehnert, S. Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development. Development 99, 371–382 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brandeis, M. et al. Sp1 elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation. Nature 371, 435–438 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Strahl, B.D. & Allis, C.D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403, 41–45 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Litt, M.D., Simpson, M., Gaszner, M., Allis, C.D. & Felsenfeld, G. Correlation between histone lysine methylation and developmental changes at the chicken β-globin locus. Science 293, 2453–2455 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolffe, A.P. Histone H1. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 29, 1463–1466 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolffe, A.P., Khochbin, S. & Dimitrov, S. What do linker histones do in chromatin? Bioessays 19, 249–255 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Renz, M. Preferential and cooperative binding of histone I to chromosomal mammalian DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 733–736 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Misteli, T., Gunjan, A., Hock, R., Bustin, M. & Brown, D.T. Dynamic binding of histone H1 to chromatin in living cells. Nature 408, 877–881 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cameron, E.E., Bachman, K.E., Myohanen, S., Herman, J.G. & Baylin, S.B. Synergy of demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in the re-expression of genes silenced in cancer. Nat. Genet. 21, 103–107 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nan, X. et al. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature 393, 386–389 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, P.L. et al. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat. Genet. 19, 187–191 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuks, F. et al. The methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 links DNA methylation to histone methylation. J. Biol. Chem. (2002).

  16. Wang, H. et al. Purification and functional characterization of a histone H3-lysine 4-specific methyltransferase. Mol. Cell 8, 1207–1217 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Briggs, S.D. et al. Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation is mediated by Set1 and required for cell growth and rDNA silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 15, 3286–3295 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zegerman, P., Canas, B., Pappin, D. & Kouzarides, T. Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation disrupts binding of nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) repressor complex. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11621–11624 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nishioka, K. et al. Set9, a novel histone H3 methyltransferase that facilitates transcription by precluding histone tail modifications required for heterochromatin formation. Genes Dev. 16, 479–489 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lallemand, Y., Luria, V., Haffner-Krausz, R. & Lonai, P. Maternally expressed PGK-Cre transgene as a tool for early and uniform activation of the Cre site specific recombinase. Transgenic Res. 7, 105–112 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhn, R., Schwenk, F., Aguet, M. & Rajewsky, K. Inducible gene targeting in mice. Science 269, 1427–1429 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eden, S., Hashimshony, T., Keshet, I., Thorne, A.W. & Cedar, H. DNA methylation models histone acetylation. Nature 394, 842–843 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bustin, M. Preparation and application of immunological probes for nucleosomes. Methods Enzymol. 170, 214–251 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hebbes, T.R., Clayton, A.L., Thorne, A.W. & Crane-Robinson, C. Core histone hyperacetylation co-maps with generalized DNase I sensitivity in the chicken β-globin chromosomal domain. EMBO J. 13, 1823–1830 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Jenuwein for his gift of branched methylated H3 Lys9 antibody. This research was supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health, the Israel Cancer Research Fund and the Arthur and Rochelle Belfer Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard Cedar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashimshony, T., Zhang, J., Keshet, I. et al. The role of DNA methylation in setting up chromatin structure during development. Nat Genet 34, 187–192 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1158

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1158

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation