Skip to main content
Log in

Koenigs et al. reply

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Replying to: G. Kahane & N. Shackel Nature 452, doi:10.1038/nature06785 (2008)

Kahane and Shackel argue1, on the basis of a re-classification of the moral scenarios used in our study2, that our conclusion of a utilitarian bias among patients with ventromedial–prefrontal–cortex (VMPC) damage is unwarranted. Here we provide a re-analysis of our data based on precisely the classification scheme that Kahane and Shackel suggest. This re-analysis confirms our conclusion that damage to the VMPC results in an increase in utilitarian judgements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kahane, G. & Shackel, N. Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias? Nature 452, 10.1038/06785 (2008)

  2. Koenigs, M. et al. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature 446, 908–911 (2007)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wheatley, T. & Haidt, J. Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychol. Sci. 16, 780–784 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Valdesolo, P. & DeSteno, D. Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychol. Sci. 17, 476–477 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Ladavas, E. & di Pellegrino, G. Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 84–92 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hauser, M. D. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed a Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (Harper Collins, New York, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cushman, F. A., Young, L. & Hauser, M. D. The role of conscious reasoning and intuitions in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1082–1089 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M. & Saxe, R. The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8235–8240 (2007)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R. et al. Koenigs et al. reply. Nature 452, E5–E6 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06804

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06804

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation