Abstract
Kasahara and Kato reply - Our announcement1 that the redox cofactor pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) is a new vitamin has been challenged as being premature by Felton and Anthony2 and by Rucker et al.3.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kasahara, T. & Kato, T. Nature 422, 832 (2003).
Felton, L. M. & Anthony, C. Nature doi:10.1038/nature03322 (2005).
Rucker, R., Storms, D., Sheets, A., Tchaparian, E. & Fascetti, A. Nature doi:10.1038/nature03323 (2005).
Anthony, C. & Ghosh, M. Progr. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 69, 1–21 (1998).
Carson, N. A. J., Scally, B. G., Neill, D. W. & Carre, I. J. Nature 218, 679 (1968).
Gatfield, P. D. et al. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 99, 1215–1233 (1968).
Chang, Y. -F., Ghosh, P. & Rao, V. V. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1038 300–305 (1990).
Blemings, K. P., Crenshaw, T. D., Swick, R. W. & Benevenga, N. J. J. Nutr. 124, 1215–1221 (1994).
Killgore, J. et al. Science 245, 850–852 (1989).
Steinberg, F. M., Gershwin, M. E. & Rucker, R. B. J. Nutr. 124, 744–753 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kasahara, T., Kato, T. Is pyrroloquinoline quinone a vitamin? (Reply). Nature 433, E11–E12 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03324
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03324
- Springer Nature Limited