Skip to main content
Log in

Soil invertebrate fauna enhances grassland succession and diversity

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

One of the most important areas in ecology is to elucidate the factors that drive succession in ecosystems and thus influence the diversity of species in natural vegetation. Significant mechanisms in this process are known to be resource limitation1,2,3 and the effects of aboveground vertebrate herbivores4,5. More recently, symbiotic and pathogenic soil microbes have been shown to exert a profound effect on the composition of vegetation6,7,8,9 and changes therein10,11. However, the influence of invertebrate soil fauna on succession has so far received little attention12,13. Here we report that invertebrate soil fauna might enhance both secondary succession and local plant species diversity. Soil fauna from a series of secondary grassland succession stages selectively suppress early successional dominant14 plant species, thereby enhancing the relative abundance of subordinate14 species and also that of species from later succession stages. Soil fauna from the mid-succession stage had the strongest effect. Our results clearly show that soil fauna strongly affects the composition of natural vegetation and we suggest that this knowledge might improve the restoration and conservation of plant species diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Change in the shoot biomass of early and mid-succession plant species and plants from the target grassland community in the presence of soil fauna relative to the control (no soil fauna added) calculated as (Bi - Bc)/Bc, where Bi and Bc are the mean shoot biomasses with and without soil fauna added, respectively.
Figure 2: Simpson's evenness index (mean ± s.e.m.) of microcosms with experimental grassland communities without and with soil fauna.
Figure 3: Effect of soil fauna from early, mid-succession and target grassland communities on total root and shoot biomasses of grasses and forbs (mean ± s.e.m.; n = 8).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Mufti, M. M., Sydes, C. L., Furness, S. B., Grime, J. P. & Band, S. R. A quantitative analysis of shoot phenology and dominance in herbaceous vegetation. J. Ecol. 65, 759–791 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marrs, R. H. Soil fertility and nature conservation in Europe: Theoretical considerations and practical management solutions. Adv. Ecol. Res. 24, 241–300 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crawley, M. J. Plant Ecology (Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olff, H. & Ritchie, M. E. Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 261–265 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Heijden, M. G. A. et al. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396, 69–72 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bever, J. D. Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology 75, 1965–1977 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Packer, A. & Clay, K. Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature 404, 278–281 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klironomos, J. N. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417, 67–70 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, N. C., Zak, D. R., Tilman, D. & Pfleger, F. L. Dynamics of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae during old field succession. Oecologia 86, 349–358 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Putten, W. H., Van Dijk, C. & Peters, B. A. M. Plant-specific soil-borne diseases contribute to succession in foredune vegetation. Nature 362, 53–56 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, V. K. & Gange, A. C. Differential effects of above- and below-ground insect herbivory during early plant succession. Oikos 54, 67–76 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, V. K. & Gange, A. C. Secondary plant succession: how is it modified by insect herbivory? Vegetatio 101, 3–13 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grime, J. P. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86, 902–910 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Clements, F. E. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation (Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC, 1916)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Blomqvist, M. M., Olff, H., Blaauw, M. B., Bongers, T. & van der Putten, W. H. Interactions between above- and belowground biota: Importance for small-scale vegetation mosaics in a grassland ecosystem. Oikos 90, 582–598 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wardle, D. A. & Barker, G. M. Competition and herbivory in establishing grassland communities: implications for plant biomass, species diversity and soil microbial activity. Oikos 80, 470–480 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bradford, M. A. et al. Impacts of soil faunal community composition on model grassland ecosystems. Science 298, 615–618 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olff, H., Hoorens, B., de Goede, R. G. M., van der Putten, W. H. & Gleichman, J. M. Small-scale shifting mosaics of two dominant grassland species: the possible role of soil-borne pathogens. Oecologia 125, 45–54 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carson, W. P. & Root, R. B. Herbivory and plant species coexistence: Community regulation by an outbreaking phytophagous insect. Ecol. Monogr. 70, 73–99 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartnett, D. C. & Wilson, G. W. T. Mycorrhizae influence plant community structure and diversity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 80, 1187–1195 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bever, J. D., Westover, K. M. & Antonovics, J. Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. J. Ecol. 85, 561–573 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Simpson, E. H. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688 (1949)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oostenbrink, M. in Nematology (eds Sasser, J. N. & Jenkins, W. R.) 85–102 (Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yeates, G. W., Bongers, T., de Goede, R. G. M., Freckman, D. W. & Georgieva, S. S. Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera—an outline for soil ecologists. J. Nematol. 25, 315–331 (1993)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. van Straalen, N. M. & Rijninks, P. C. The efficiency of Tullgren apparatus with respect to interpreting seasonal changes in age structure of soil arthropod populations. Pedobiologia 24, 197–209 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Petersen, H. & Luxton, M. A comparative analysis of soil fauna and their role in decomposition processes. Oikos 39, 287–388 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. A. Harvey for a critical reading of a previous version of the manuscript. This work was funded by the Dutch NWO-ALW Stimulation Programme Biodiversity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerlinde B. De Deyn.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Deyn, G., Raaijmakers, C., Zoomer, H. et al. Soil invertebrate fauna enhances grassland succession and diversity. Nature 422, 711–713 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01548

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01548

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation