Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parthenogenesis in Komodo dragons

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Should males and females be kept together to avoid triggering virgin birth in these endangered reptiles?

Abstract

Parthenogenesis, the production of offspring without fertilization by a male, is rare in vertebrate species, which usually reproduce after fusion of male and female gametes. Here we use genetic fingerprinting to identify parthenogenetic offspring produced by two female Komodo dragons (Varanus komodoensis) that had been kept at separate institutions and isolated from males; one of these females subsequently produced additional offspring sexually. This reproductive plasticity indicates that female Komodo dragons may switch between asexual and sexual reproduction, depending on the availability of a mate — a finding that has implications for the breeding of this threatened species in captivity. Most zoos keep only females, with males being moved between zoos for mating, but perhaps they should be kept together to avoid triggering parthenogenesis and thereby decreasing genetic diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

I. STEPHEN

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ciofi, C. & De Boer, M. Herpetol. J. 14, 99–107 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ciofi, C. & Bruford, M. W. Mol. Ecol. 7, 134–136 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. White, M. J. D. Animal Cytology and Evolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avise, J. C., Quattro, J. M. & Vrijenhoek, R. C. in Evolutionary Biology (eds Hecht, M. K., Wallace, B. & MacIntyre, R. J.) 225–246 (Plenum, New York, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Groot, T. V. M., Bruins, E. & Breeuwer, J. A. Heredity 90, 130–135 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lenk, P., Eidenmueller, B., Staudter, H., Wicker, R. & Wink, M. Amphibia-Reptilia 26, 507–514 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saccheri, I. J. et al. Nature 392, 491–494 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spielman, D., Brook, B. W. & Frankham, R. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15261–15264 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sherratt, T. N. & Beatty, C. D. Nature 435, 1039–1040 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Halverson, J. & Spelman, L. H. in Biology and Conservation of Komodo Dragons (eds Murphy, J. B., Ciofi, C., de La Panouse, C. & Walsh, T.) 165–177 (Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phillip C. Watts.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Methods

This file presents full details of (1) the movements and reproductive histories of the two female Komodo dragons (Flora and Sungai) that produced parthenogenetic offspring, (2) the methods used for genotyping and (3) the statistical analyses used to exclude sexual reproduction.

Supplementary Table 1

This table provides the raw genotype data of all Komodo dragons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watts, P., Buley, K., Sanderson, S. et al. Parthenogenesis in Komodo dragons. Nature 444, 1021–1022 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/4441021a

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/4441021a

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation