Skip to main content
Log in

Laboratory animal welfare

Cage enrichment and mouse behaviour

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Test responses by laboratory mice are unperturbed by more entertaining housing.

Abstract

Mice housed in standard cages show impaired brain development, abnormal repetitive behaviours (stereotypies) and an anxious behavioural profile, all of which can be lessened by making the cage environment more stimulating1,2,3. But concerns have been raised that enriched housing might disrupt standardization and so affect the precision and reproducibility of behavioural-test results (for example, see ref. 4). Here we show that environmental enrichment increases neither individual variability in behavioural tests nor the risk of obtaining conflicting data in replicate studies. Our findings indicate that the housing conditions of laboratory mice can be markedly improved without affecting the standardization of results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Mean (±s.e.m.) proportion of variance in representative measures of four behavioural tests, contributed by within-group variability and laboratory × strain interactions, in a multilaboratory study comparing female DBA/2, C57BL/6J and B6D2F1 mice housed under standard (orange) and enriched (blue) conditions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Praag, H., Kempermann, G. & Gage, F. H. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 191–198 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Würbel, H. Trends Neurosci. 24, 207–211 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapillon, P., Manneche, C., Belzung, C. & Caston, J. Behav. Genet. 29, 41–46 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gärtner, K. in Proc. Int. Joint Meeting 12th ICLAS General Assembly and Conference & 7th FELASA Symposium, SECAL, Madrid 207–210 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D. & Dudek, B. C. Science 284, 1670–1672 (1999).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Staay, F. J. & Steckler, T. Genes Brain Behav. 1, 9–13 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Würbel, H. Genes Brain Behav. 1, 3–8 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Loo, P. L. P., Van Zutphen, L. F. M. & Baumans, V. Lab. Anim. 37, 300–313 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanno Würbel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolfer, D., Litvin, O., Morf, S. et al. Cage enrichment and mouse behaviour. Nature 432, 821–822 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/432821a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/432821a

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation