Skip to main content
Log in

Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

AFTER the detection of a target item in a rapid stream of visual stimuli, there is a period of 400–600 ms during which subsequent targets are missed. This impairment has been labelled the 'attentional blink'1. It has been suggested that, unlike an eye blink, the additional blink does not reflect a suppression of perceptual processing, but instead reflects a loss of information at a postperceptual stage, such as visual short-term memory2–4. Here we provide electrophysiological evidence that words presented during the attentional blink period are analysed to the point of meaning extraction, even though these extracted meanings cannot be reported 1–2 s later. This shows that the attentional blink does indeed reflect a loss of information at a postperceptual stage of processing, and provides a demonstration of the modularity of human brain function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L. & Arnell, K. M. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 849–860 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E. & Arnell, K. M. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 357–371 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chun, M. M. & Potter, M. C. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 109–127 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shapiro, K., Driver, J., Ward, R. & Sorensen, R. E. Psychol. Sci. in the press).

  5. Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. Science 270, 203–205 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Besson, M., Kutas, M. & Van Petten, C. J. Cog. Neurosci. 4, 132–149 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Osterhout, L. & Holcomb, P. J. in Electrophysiology of Mind (eds Rugg, M. D. & Coles, M. G. H.) 171–215 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kutas, M., Van Petten, C. & Besson, M. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69, 218–233 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McCarthy, G. & Nobre, A. C. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 88, 210–219 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mangun, G. R., Hillyard, S. A. & Luck, S. J. in Attention and Performance XIV (eds Meyer, D. & Kornblum, S.) 219–243 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luck, S. J. et al. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 887–904 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eimer, M. Percept. Psychophys. 55, 667–675 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Potter, M. C. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 2, 509–522 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luck, S., Vogel, E. & Shapiro, K. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink . Nature 383, 616–618 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/383616a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/383616a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation