Skip to main content
Log in

Global atmospheric chemistry of CFC-123

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE compound 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane (CFC-123), which is potentially usable as a foam-blowing agent in the plastics industry, an aerosol propellant and a refrigerant, has been proposed as an industrial substitute for trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11), the use of which is increasingly restricted because of its effects on the ozone layer and on climate1–3. It is expected that CFC-123, although like CFC-11 an absorber of infrared radiation, will be less stable in the atmosphere because of its expected reaction with OH radicals in the troposphere. Using a three-dimensional global model of the atmosphere, we have calculated the chemical destruction rates of CFC-123 by various processes, confirming that the chief sink is destruction by OH radicals below 12 km, which accounts for 88% of its loss. The calculated destruction rate is greatest in the equatorial region below 2 km. The calculated steady-state lifetime of CFC-123 is 1.5 years, based on the best available estimate of the rate constant of the reaction with OH. This lifetime is very much shorter than that of CFC-11, the destruction of which is largely confined to the stratosphere. For equal rates (by mass) of CFC-123 and CFC-11 emission to the atmosphere, the molar content in the atmosphere and the injection rate of chlorine into the stratosphere are, respectively, 48 and 14 times greater for CFC-11 than for CFC-123 in steady-state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. Rowland, F. & Molina, M. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 13,1–35 (1975). 2. Ramanathan, V., Cicerone, R., Singh, H. & Kiehl, J. J. geophys. Res. 90, 5547–5566 (1985). 3. United Nations Environment Programme Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer: Final Act (United Nations, New York, 1987). 4. Golombek, A. & Prinn, R. J. geophys. Res. 91, 3985–4001 (1986). 5. Golombek, A. & Prinn, R. Geophys. Res. Lett. 16,1153–1156 (1989). 6. DeMore, W. ef al. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric Modelling, Evaluation No. 9. NASA/JPL Publication (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, in the press). 7. Prinn, R. et al. Science 238, 945–950 (1987). 8. Herman, J. & Mentali, J. J. geophys. Res. 87, 8967–8975 (1982). 9. DeMore, W. et al. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Stratospheric Modelling, Evaluation No. 8. NASA/JPL Publication 87–41 (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, 1987). 10. Davidson, J., Schifi, H., Brown, T. & Howard, C. JL chem. Phys. 69, 4277–4279 (1978). 11. Gillotay, D., Simon, P. & Brasseur G. Planetary and Space Science (Pergamon, Oxford, in the press). 12. Atkinson, R. ef al. J. phys. Chem. ©f. Data 18, 881–1081 (1989). 13. Ko, M. & Sze, N. D. Nature 297, 317–319 (1982).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prinn, R., Golombek, A. Global atmospheric chemistry of CFC-123. Nature 344, 47–49 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/344047a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/344047a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation