Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Information processing of visual stimuli in an ‘extinguished’ field

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Lesions of the right parieto-occipital cortex in man produce a variety of behavioural disturbances which interfere with the detection of, and orientation to external stimuli1. One striking example is extinction to double simultaneous stimulation (DSS), in which presentation of a single stimulus in any area of the visual field results in its accurate description, but lateralised simultaneous presentation of two stimuli, one in each field, results in the verbal description of only the stimulus in the right visual field (RVF)2. While extinction to DSS can also be demonstrated in other (non-visual) sensory modalites3, and is occasionally seen following left-hemisphere lesions4 our concern here is with visual extinction to DSS following right parieto-occipital lesions whose precise nature is poorly understood although variety of theories have been proposed to account for it5–7. One of the critical, yet unexplored questions about extinction concerns the fate of the extinguished stimulus. The following observations demonstrate that although the extinguished stimulus often goes completely unnoticed by the patient, the patients are able to utilise the extinguished stimulus in an interfield comparison task. Accurate same/different judgments between the visual fields could be made in situations in which the patients did not know the identity of, and at times even denied the presence of, the left field stimulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedland, R. P. & Weinstein, E. A. in Hemi-Inattention and Hemisphere Speicalization (eds Weinstein E. A. & Friedland, R. P.) 1–31 (Raven, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bender, M. B. in Hemi-Inattention and Hemisphere Specialization (eds Weinstein, E. A. & Friedland, R. P.) 107–110 (Raven, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Critchley, M. Brain 72, 538–561 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Denny-Brown, D. & Banker, B. Archs neurol. Psychiat. 71, 302–313 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eidelberg, E. & Schwartz, A. S. Brain 94, 91–108 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heilman, K. M. & Valenstein, E. Neurology 22, 660–664 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Battersby, W. S., Bender, M. B. & Pollack, M. Brain 79, 68–93 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. New, P. F. J. & Scott, W. R. Computerized Tomography of the Brain (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gazzaniga, M. S. The Bisected Brain (Appleton-Century-Croft, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Treisman, A. M. J. verb. Learning verb. Behav. 3, 449–459 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, J. L. J. exp. Psych. 85, 225–228 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. MacKay, D. G. Q. J. exp. Psych. 25, 22–28 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lackner, J. R. & Garrett, M. F. Cognition 1, 359–374 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volpe, B., Ledoux, J. & Gazzaniga, M. Information processing of visual stimuli in an ‘extinguished’ field. Nature 282, 722–724 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/282722a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/282722a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation