Skip to main content
Log in

Endplate current fluctuations reveal only one channel type at frog neuromuscular junction

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

SIGNAL transduction between nerve and muscle is mediated by a chemical process at the neuromuscular junction. In the nerve ending electrical activity causes the release of acetylcholine (ACh) into the synaptic cleft separating the nerve and muscle cells. ACh can bind to specific chemical receptors in the postjunctional muscle membrane; these receptors control a gating mechanism that can increase membrane conductance locally. Normal nervous activity triggers an action potential and contraction in twitch muscle fibres. At constant membrane potential the membrane conductance change induces a current that is carried largely by Na+ and K+ in frog1, moving through ACh-gated membrane channels. There has been a controversy regarding the nature of the chemically gated endplate channels; are there kinetically-independent channels for Na+ and K+ , or are these ions transported by the same channel? Maeno2 initially proposed separate endplate channels, arguing that the two component decay of endplate potentials in procaine-treated cells resulted from a selective effect on Na+ channel kinetics. Kordas3,4 and Magleby and Stevens5 argued that Maeno's two-channel hypothesis could not account for the unique reversal potential observed or the monotonic voltage dependence of endplate current (EPC) decay. The analysis below of iontophoretically-induced EPC fluctuations in procaine-treated and untreated preparations indicates that the ions which constitute the EPC are not carried by kinetically distinguishable endplate channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takeuchi, A. & Takeuchi, N. J. Physiol., Lond. 154, 52–67 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maeno, T. J. Physiol., Lond. 183, 592–606 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kordas, M. J. Physiol., Lond. 204, 493–502 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kordas, M. J. Physiol., Lond. 209, 689–699 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Magleby, K. L. & Stevens, C. F. J. Physiol., Lond. 223, 173–197 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Colquhoun, D., Dionne, V. E., Steinbach, J. H. & Stevens, C. F. Nature 253, 204–206 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Katz, B. & Miledi, R. Nature 226, 962–963 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dionne, V. E. & Stevens, C. F. J. Physiol., Lond. 251, 245–270 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruff, R. L. J. Physiol., Lond. (in press).

  10. Anderson, C. R. & Stevens, C. F. J. Physiol., Lond. 235, 655–691 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mallart, A., Dreyer, F. & Peper, K. Pflugers Arch. ges. Physiol. 362, 43–47 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DIONNE, V., RUFF, R. Endplate current fluctuations reveal only one channel type at frog neuromuscular junction. Nature 266, 263–265 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/266263a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/266263a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation