Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An asparaginyl endopeptidase processes a microbial antigen for class II MHC presentation

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Foreign protein antigens must be broken down within endosomes or lysosomes to generate suitable peptides that will form complexes with class II major histocompatibility complex molecules for presentation to T cells. However, it is not known which proteases are required for antigen processing. To investigate this, we exposed a domain of the microbial tetanus toxin antigen (TTCF) to disrupted lysosomes that had been purified from a human B-cell line. Here we show that the dominant processing activity is not one of the known lysosomal cathepsins, which are generally believed to be the principal enzymes involved in antigen processing, but is instead an asparagine-specific cysteine endopeptidase. This enzyme seems similar or identical to a mammalian homologue1 of the legumain/haemoglobinase asparaginyl endopeptidases found originally in plants2 and parasites3. We designed competitive peptide inhibitors of B-cell asparaginyl endopeptidase (AEP) that specifically block its proteolytic activity and inhibit processing of TTCF in vitro. In vivo, these inhibitors slow TTCF presentation to T cells, whereas preprocessing of TTCF with AEP accelerates its presentation, indicating that this enzyme performs a key step in TTCF processing. We also show that N-glycosylation of asparagine residues blocks AEP action in vitro. This indicates that N-glycosylation could eliminate sites of processing by AEP in mammalian proteins, allowing preferential processing of microbial antigens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Processing of TTCF by a leupeptin-insensitive cysteine endopeptidase activity.
Figure 2: TTCF is processed by an asparaginyl endopeptidase.
Figure 3: Specific peptide inhibitors of asparaginyl endopeptidase.
Figure 4: TTCF processing and presentation requires AEP in vivo.
Figure 5: Asparagine N-glycosylation blocks asparaginyl endopeptidase action.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, J. M.et al. Cloning, isolation, and characterisation of mammalian legumain, an asparaginyl endopeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8090–8098 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kembhavi, A. A., Buttle, D. J., Knight, C. G. & Barrett, A. J. The two cysteine endopeptidases of legume seeds: purification and characterization by use of specific fluorometric assays. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 303, 208–213 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalton, J. P., Hola Jamriska, L. & Bridley, P. J. Asparaginyl endopeptidase activity in adult Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology 111, 575–580 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, K.et al. Antigen processing for presentation by class II major histocompatibility complex requires cleavage by cathespin E. Eur. J. Immunol. 22, 1519–1524 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Riese, R. J.et al. Essential role for cathepsin S in MHC class II-associated invariant chain processing and peptide loading. Immunity 4, 357–366 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodriguez, G. M. & Diment, S. Role of cathepsin D in antigen presentation of ovalbumin. J. Immunol. 149, 2894–2898 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hewitt, E. W.et al. Natural processing sites for human cathepsin E and cathepsin D in tetanus toxin: implications for T cell epitope generation. J. Immunol. 159, 4693–4699 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Watts, C. Capture and processing of exogenous antigens for presentation on MHC molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 821–850 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapman, H. A. Endosomal proteases and MHC class II function. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10, 93–102 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fineschi, B. & Miller, J. Endosomal proteases and antigen processing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 377–382 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, J. & van Halbeek, H. Complete 1H and 13C resonance assignments of a 21-amino acid glycopeptide prepared from human serum transferrin. Carbohydr. Res. 296, 1–21 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fearon, D. T. & Locksley, R. M. The instructive role of innate immunity in the acquired immune response. Science 272, 50–54 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Medzhitov, R. & Janeway, C. A. J. Innate immunity: the virtues of a nonclonal system of recognition. Cell 91, 295–298 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wyatt, R.et al. The antigenic structure of the HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein. Nature 393, 705–711 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Botarelli, P.et al. N-glycosylation of HIV gp120 may constrain recognition by T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 147, 3128–3132 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson, H. W., West, M. A. & Watts, C. Endocytosis, intracellular trafficking, and processing of membrane IgG and monovalent antigen/membrane IgG complexes in B lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 144, 4101–4109 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barrett, A. J. & Kirschke, H. Cathepsin B, cathepsin H and cathepsin L. Methods Enzymol. 80, 535–559 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Makoff, A. J., Ballantine, S. P., Smallwood, A. E. & Fairweather, N. F. Expression of tetanus toxin fragment C in E. coli: its purification and potential use as a vaccine. Biotechnology 7, 1043–1046 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lane, D. P. & Harlow, E. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lanzavecchia, A. Antigen-specific interaction between T and B cells. Nature 314, 537–539 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pond, L. & Watts, C. Characterization of transport of newly assembled, T cell-stimulatory MHC class II-peptide complexes from MHC class II compartments to the cell surface. J. Immunol. 159, 543–553 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Ferguson for helpful discussions and advice; E. Smythe and L. Grayson for advice and technical assistance; B. Spruce, A. Knight and the BTS (Ninewells Hospital) for help with blood monocyte preparation; and our colleagues for many helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and by an EMBO Long-term fellowship to B. M.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin Watts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manoury, B., Hewitt, E., Morrice, N. et al. An asparaginyl endopeptidase processes a microbial antigen for class II MHC presentation. Nature 396, 695–699 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/25379

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/25379

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation