Abstract
IN a recent communication in Nature1, Weibull tends to regard my theory of bacterial motility as incorrect and as based on misinterpretation of observations made with dark-field microscopy. He confuses the issue, as so many do, by assuming that ‘flagella’ in different groups of bacteria mean the same thing, whereas in reality they often are structures sui generis in the various groups and may have very little or even nothing in common2–6.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weibull, c., Nature, 167, 511 (1951).
Pijper, A., J. Path. Bact., 58, 325 (1946).
Pijper, A., J. Bact., 57, 110 (1949).
Pijper, A., and Nunn, A. J., J. Roy. Micr. Soc., 69, 138 (1949).
Pijper, A., in “The Nature of the Bacterial Surface” (Blackwell, Oxford, 1949).
Pijper, A., Schw. Z. Pathol. u. Bakt., 12, 681 (1949).
Pijper, A., J. Path. Bact., 47, 1 (1938).
Pijper, A., J. Bact., 42, 395 (1941).
Pijper, A., Science, 109, 379 (1949).
Pijper, A., Z. Bakt., I, Orig., 118, 113 (1930).
Pijper, A., Z. Bakt., I, Orig., 123, 195 (1931–32).
Pijper, A., J. Biol. Phot. Assoc., 8, 158 (1940).
Pijper, A., a motion picture of bacterial shape and motility (Pretoria, Wallachs, 1947).
Pijper, A., Nature, 161, 200 (1948).
Pijper, A., S. Afr. J. Sci., 46, 296 (1950).
Pijper, A., J. Bact., 53, 257 (1947).
Unpublished observations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PIJPER, A. Bacterial Flagella. Nature 168, 749–750 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1038/168749b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/168749b0
- Springer Nature Limited