Abstract
The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is a facility for trading `certified emission reductions (CERs) between developing and developed countries, thus saving non-renewable carbon emissions by promoting renewable energy, energy efficiency and/or carbon sequestration projects in LDC's. The purpose of the CDM is to help these latter countries meet their obligations under the Kyoto Protocol while at the same time promoting “sustainable” development in the former countries, thereby reducing the build-up of greenhouse gases (GHG). This paper examines the progress in achieving a workable CDM in time for the first commitment period (2008–2012), and the kinds of initiatives that can be pursued in the agricultural, land-use and forestry sector in tropical countries.
The critical element for the success of the CDM is the participation of a broad cross-section of buyers (ultimately from developed countries) and sellers (from developing countries) of CERs. Trading is the final step, which starts with project formulation, through successful implementation and then certification. This paper lays out a market-based framework for promoting CDM transactions between private sector project developers and traders and public sector policy makers, with regulators, governed by CDM rules, overseeing the smooth running of the CDM. However, as there are numerous players; it is proposed that trial CDM projects be demonstrated with the support of National/International bodies to iron out the problems and come up with practical solutions so that carbon trading can become a reality.
Most rules for the CDM were clarified at the 7th Conference of Parties (CP) in October/November of 2001 in Marrakesh. An executive Board (EB) was appointed and this EB is in charge of proposing workable ground rules to promote the CDM. These have to be submitted for approval by the 8th CP in late 2002. Three broad kinds of projects qualify for the CDM, these are: renewable energy projects that will be alternatives to fossil fuel projects; sequestration projects that offset GHG emissions; and energy efficient projects that will decrease the emissions of GHG. It is possible to have a combination of these initiatives. A fourth type covering GHG reduction is omitted. As elaborated in the text, in order to qualify for the CDM, the proposed projects may have to have additional costs when compared to the alternative(s). Two time frames have been agreed for CDM projects to qualify for the first commitment period, namely 7 years (with an option of two 7-year renewals) and 10 years. Also, for land-use, land-use change and forestry projects only afforestation/reforestation initiatives are recognized as being permissible for the first commitment period. These rules seem rather shortsighted, as forestry and/or renewable energy projects usually require more than 21 years to be fully effective. Also, the major cause of deforestation is clearing land for agriculture, not harvesting wood. Therefore, improving agricultural productivity may be the best way to reduce deforestation and its subsequent release of GHGs. These conditionalities should be re-examined when rules for the second commitment period are decided. However, various agricultural and land-use projects are discussed under the existing guidelines which could qualify as CDM projects in the first period.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AED: 1997, Greenhouse Gas Assessment Handbook, Prepared for the Global Environment Division, Environment Dept. World Bank. IRG (EEM), Washington, DC, USA.
Bode, J-W., de Beer, J., Blok, K. and Ellis, J.: 2000, An Initial View on Methodologies for Emission Baselines: Iron and Steel Case Study, Paris, OECD/IEA.
Bosi, M.: 2000, An Initial View on Methodologies for Emission Baselines: Electrical Generating Case Study', Paris, OECD/IEA.
Bouwman, A.F. (ed.): 1990, Soils and the Greenhouse Effect, New York, Wiley.
Ellerman, A.D., Jacboy, H.D. and Decaux, A.: 1998, 'The effects on developing countries of the Kyoto Protocol and carbon dioxide emissions trading', Policy Research Working Paper 2019, the World Bank, Washington.
Ellis, J.: 1999, 'Emission baselines for clean development mechanism projects: lessons from the AIJ pilot phase', Proceedings of Workshop on Baseline for CDM, Tokyo, Japan.
Friedman, S.: 1999, 'The use of benchmarks to determine emissions additionality in the clean development mechanism,' Proceedings of Workshop on Baseline for CDM, Tokyo, Japan.
Haites, E.: 1998, 'International emissions trading and compliance with GHG limitation commitments', Working Paper W70, International Academy of the Environment, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hassing, P. and Mendis, M S.: 1998, 'Sustainable development and GHG reduction', Issues and Options; The Clean Development Mechanism, UN Development Programme, New York.
Hassing, P. and Mendis, M.S.: 1999, 'An International Market Framework for CDM Transactions', Internal paper prepared for DGIS (The Netherlands Ministry of Development Cooperation), IRG (EEM), Washington, DC, USA.
Kaplan, M. and Mein, J.: 2000, Matching Carbon Emissions Reduction to Financing: Building prototypes, Aspen Colorado, USA.
Matsuo, N. et al.: 1998, 'Issues and Options in the Design of the Clean Development Mechanism', The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), United Nations Development Programme, New York, USA.
Michaelowa, A.: 1999, 'Baseline settings in the AIJ pilot phase', Reports on AIJ Projects and Contributions to the Discussions of the Kyoto Mechanisms, Bundesumweltministerium, Berlin.
Openshaw, K.: 2000a, 'A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise', Biomass and Bioenergy 19, 1–15.
Openshaw, K.: 2000b, 'Benin: a baseline survey of organic carbon in woody biomass and soils on different land-use types in the PGFTR project area', Alternative Energy Development/International Resources Group for the Government of Benin-World Bank/GEF PGFTR Project, IRG (EEM), Washington, DC, USA.
Puhl, I.: 1998, 'Status of research on project baselines under the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol', OECD and IEA Information Paper, Paris, France.
PWC (Price Waterhouse Cooper): 2000, 'A business view on key issues relating to the Kyoto Mechanism', London, PWC.
Sandor, R.: 2000, 'CDM-simplicity is the key', Environmental Finance, Supplement: The Carbon Challenge-Industry, Climate Change and Kyoto, pp. 19-21.
Vine, E.L., Sathaye, J.A. and Makundi, W.R.: 2001, 'An overview of guidelines and issues for the monitoring, evaluation, reporting, verification, and certification of forestry projects for climate change mitigation', Global Environmental Change 11, 203–216.
Werksman, J.: 1999, 'Responding to non-compliance under the climate change regime', OECD Information Paper ENV/EPOC(99)21/FINAL, OECD, Paris, France.
Western, D.J.: 1981, 'A survey of natural wood supplies in Kenya', Kenya Rangeland Ecological Monitoring Unit, Box 47146, Nairobi, Kenya.
WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development): 2001, The Greenhouse Gas Protocol-A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, Geneva, Switzerland, 64 pp.
WBSSP (World Bank Strategy Study Program): 1997, Host Country Institutional Framework, http://www. esd.worldbank.org/cc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mendis, M., Openshaw, K. THE Clean Development Mechanism: Making it Operational. Environment, Development and Sustainability 6, 183–211 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ENVI.0000003637.28190.ca
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ENVI.0000003637.28190.ca