Abstract
In an experiment designed to elicit restrictive relatives clauses, 28 children ranging in age from 2:2 to 3:10 provided a corpus of communicatively appropriate relative clauses. In evaluating this corpus, we found that most children produced mostly adult relative clauses most of the time. Detailed study of these utterances uncovered a few error patterns, which we analyzed in light of several considerations (e.g., the overall frequency of an error type, its distribution across children and items, its relation to the construction under study, and the similarity of the error to what children do elsewhere). Only one error pattern, namely some children's production of inappropriate relative pronouns, is argued to reflect a systematic feature of language development. We conclude that children's ability to represent the syntactic structure of the embedded clause is on target very early.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bernstein, J., McDaniel, D., & McKee, C. (1998). Resumptive pronoun strategies in English-speaking children. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 1) 58–68. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Bock, K. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93.
Bock, K. (1993). Meaning, sound, and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57–99.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
Crain, S., McKee, C., & Emiliani, M. (1990). Visiting relatives in Italy. In L. Frazier & J. de Villiers (Eds.), Language processing and language acquisition. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Ferreiro, E., Othenin-Girard, C., Chipman, H., & Sinclair, H. (1976). How do children handle relative clauses? A study in comparative developmental psycholinguistics. Archives de Psychologie. XLV, 299–266.
Fodor, J., & Garrett, M. (1966). Some reflections on competence and performance. In J. Lyons & R. Wales (Eds.), Psycholinguistics papers. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University.
Foss, D., & Fay, D. (1975). Linguistic theory and performance models. In D. Cohen & J. Wirth (Eds.), Testing linguistic hypotheses. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Goodluck, H. (1978). Linguistic principles in children's grammar of complement subject interpretation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Goodluck, H., & Tavakolian, S. (1982). Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses. Cognition, 11, 1–27.
Guasti, M. T., & Shlonsky, U. (1995). The acquisition of French relative clauses reconsidered. Language Acquisition, 4, 257–276.
Hamburger, H. (1980). A deletion ahead of is time. Cognition, 8, 380–416.
Hamburger, H., & Crain, S. (1982). Relative acquisition. In S. Kuczaj II (Ed.), Language development: Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ingram, D. (1975). If and when transformations are acquired by children. Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics, 27, 99–127.
Labelle, M. (1990). Predication, WH-movement, and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 1, 95–119.
Legum, S. (1975). Strategies in the acquisition of relative clauses (Southwest Regional Laboratory Tech. Note TN 2-75-10)
Leopold, W. F. (1949). Speech development in a bilingual child: A linguist's record (Vol. IV). Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press.
Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Limber, J. (1976). Unraveling competence, performance and pragmatics in the speech of young children. Journal of Child Language, 3, 309–318.
McDaniel, D., McKee, C., & Bernstein, J. (1998). How children's relative solve a problem for Minimalism. Language, 74, 308–334.
McKee, C., & Emiliani, M. (1992). II clitico: C'é ma non si vede. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 415–437.
Menyuk, P. (1969). Sentences children use. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ouhalla, J. (1994). Introducing transformational grammar: From rules to principles and parameters. London, England: Edward Arnold.
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Radford, A. (1988). Small children's small clauses. Transactions of the Philological Society, 86, 1–46.
Sells, P. (1984). Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272–281.
Solan, L., & Roeper, T. (1978). Children's use of syntactic structure in interpreting relative clauses. In H. Goodluck & L. Solan (Eds.), Papers in the structure and development of child language (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers, Vol. 4). Amherst: Linguistics Department, University of Massachusetts.
Tavakolian, S. (1977). Structural principles in the acquisition of complex sentences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKee, C., McDaniel, D. & Snedeker, J. Relatives Children Say. J Psycholinguist Res 27, 573–596 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024901029643
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024901029643