Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rational Comprehension of Arguments in Theoretical Texts: A Program for an Argumentative-Linguistic Approach

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method of linguistically-oriented reasoning comprehension is proposed. It is based on semiological principles of text comprehension. Both content and form are essential for comprehending argumentative texts. A text recipient is viewed as a rational judge trying to detect all the components of the argument he/she considers and thus to see if the argument is consistent. Elementary and higher level argumentative units of the text are discovered by applying a modified S. Toulmin's model of argumentative functions. Validity and correctness of arguments are established by means of a new – linguistic – interpretation of traditional syllogistic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, A. and D. Belnap, Jr.: 1961, ‘Enthymemes’, The Journal of Philosophy 58, 713-723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, T. A. van and W. Kintsch: 1983, Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, Ch.: 1970, ‘Subjects, Speakers, and Roles’, Synthese 21, 251-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fohr, S.: 1980, ‘The Deductive/Inductive Distinction’, Informal Logic Newsletter 2, 5-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J.: 1983, ‘Logical Form, Probability Interpretations, and the Deductive/Inductive Distinction’, Informal Logic Newsletter 5, 2-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumerton, R.: 1980, ‘Induction and Reasoning to the Best Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 47, 589-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T.: 1980, ‘More on Deductive and Inductive Arguments’, Informal Logic Newsletter 2, 7-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, D.: 1981, ‘Deduction, Induction, and Conduction’, Informal Logic Newsletter 3, 7-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1929, Critique of Pure Reason, N. K. Smith (trans.), MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Ch.: 1932, Collected Papers, Vol.2. Ed. by Ch. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Popper, K. P: 1974, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassiliev, L.: 1985, ‘O vosstanovlenii ellipsisa na osnove freimovogo podhoda’, Psiholingvisticheskiye issledovaniya: lexica, fonetica ('On Frame-Based Reconstruction of Ellipsis’, Psycholinguistic Investigations: Lexics, Phonetics), Kalinin State University, Kalinin, pp. 54-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassiliev, L.: 1991, Text i yego ponimaniye (Text and Its Comprehension), Tver State University, Tver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassiliev, L.: 1994, Argumentativnyje aspecty ponimaniya (Argumentation Aspects of Comprehension), Institute for Psychology at Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weddle, P.: 1979, ‘Inductive, Deductive’, Informal Logic Newsletter 2, 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Foreign Languages, Kaluga State Pedagogical University, 26 Razin street, Kaluga, 248023, Russia

    Lev G. Vassiliev

Authors
  1. Lev G. Vassiliev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vassiliev, L.G. Rational Comprehension of Arguments in Theoretical Texts: A Program for an Argumentative-Linguistic Approach. Argumentation 17, 21–34 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022946330299

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022946330299

Search

Navigation