Abstract
Falsificationism has dominated 20th century philosophy of science. It seemed to have eclipsed all forms of inductivism. Yet recent debates have revived a specific form of eliminative inductivism, the basic ideas of which go back to F. Bacon and J.S. Mill. These modern endorsements of eliminative inductivism claim to show that progressive problem solving is possible using induction, rather than falsification as a method of justification. But this common ground between falsificationism and eliminative inductivism has not led to a detailed investigation into the relationship, if any, which may exist between these two methodologies. This paper reviews several versions of eliminative inductivism, establishes a natural relation between eliminative inductivism and falsificationism, which derives from the distinction between models and theories, and carries out this investigation against a case study of the construction of atom models. The result of the investigation is that falsificationism is a form of eliminative inductivism in the limit of certain constraints.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bacon, F.: 1875, Novum Organum. In J. Spedding, R.L. Ellis and D.D. Heath (eds.), Works. Volume IV, London.
Barkla, Ch.G.: 1911, Note on the Energy of Scattered X-radiation. Philosophical Magazine 21: 648–653.
Bohr, N.: 1913, On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules. Philosophical Magazine 26: 1–25.
Bohr, N.: 1915, On the Quantum Theory of Radiation and the Structure of the Atom. Philosophical Magazine 30: 394–415.
Born, M.: 1927, Quantenmechanik und Statistik. Die Naturwissenschaften 15: 238–242.
Born, M.: 1949, Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance. Oxford: Clarendon.
Conway, A.W.: 1913, An Electromagnetic Hypothesis as to the Origin of Series Spectra. Philosophical Magazine 26: 1010–1017.
Dirac, P.: 1963, The Evolution of the Physicist's Picture of Nature. Scientific American 208: 45–53.
Dorling, J.: 1973, Demonstrative Induction: Its Significant Role in the History of Science. Philosophy of Science 40: 360–372.
Earman, J.: 1996, Bayes or Bust?. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
Eddington, A.: 1938, The Philosophy of Physical Science. London: Cambridge University Press.
Geiger, H.: 1909-1910, The Scattering of the α-Particles by Matter. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 83: 492–504.
Geiger, H., J.H. Fellow and E. Marsden: 1908-1909, On a Diffuse Reflection of the α-Particles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 82: 495–500.
Geiger, H. and E. Marsden: 1913, The Laws of Deflexion of α Particles through Large Angles. Philosophical Magazine 25: 604–623.
Goodman, N.: 1972, Problems and Projects. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Grünbaum, A.: 1977a, Popper versus Inductivism. In G. Radnitzky and G. Andersson (eds.), Progress and Rationality in Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 117–142.
Grünbaum, A.: 1977b, How Scientific is Psychoanalysis?. In R. Stern, L.S. Horowitz and J. Lynes (eds.), Science and Psychotherapy. New York: Haven Publishing Corp., pp. 219–254.
Hawthorne, J.: 1993, Bayesian Induction Is Eliminative Induction. Philosophical Topics 21: 99–138.
Heilbron, J.L.: 1968, The Scattering of α and β Particles and Rutherford's Atom. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 4: 247–307.
Heilbron, J.L.: 1981, Historical Studies in the Theory of Atomic Structure. New York: Arno Press.
Heilbron, J.L. and Th.S. Kuhn: 1969, The Genesis of the Bohr Atom. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 1: 211–290.
Heisenberg, W.: 1930, The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. Dover Publications.
Heisenberg, W.: 1956, Die Entwicklung der Deutung der Quantentheorie. In W. Blum, H.P. Dürr and H. Rechenberg (eds.), Gesammelte Werke/Collected Works. München/Zürich: Piper 1984, Abteilung C/1: pp. 435–449.
Heisenberg, W.: 1974, The Philosophical Background of Modern Physics. In W. Blum, H.P. Dürr and H. Rechenberg (eds.), Gesammelte Werke/Collected Works. München/Zürich: Piper 1985, Abteilung C/3: pp. 496–506. Howson, C. and P. Urbach: 21993, Scientific Reasoning. Chicago/La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Kitcher, Ph.: 1993, The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laymon, R.: 1994, Demonstrative Induction, Old and New Evidence and the Accuracy of the Electrostatic Inverse Square Law. Synthese 99: 23–58.
Mackie, J.L.: 1980, The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.
Maher, P.: 1996, Subjective and Objective Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 63: 149–174.
Medawar, P.: 1984, Pluto's Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, D.: 1994, Critical Rationalism. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.
Moseley, H.G.J.: 1913, The High-Frequency Spectra of the Elements. Philosophical Magazine 26: 1024–1034.
Moseley, H.G.J.: 1914, The High-Frequency Spectra of the Elements. Part II. Philosophical Magazine 27: 703–713.
Nilsson, Dan-E. and S. Pelger: 1994, A Pessimistic Estimate of the Time Required for an Eye to Evolve. Proc. of the Royal Society of London ser. B, 256: 53–58, reprinted in M. Ridley (ed.) (1997), Evolution.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 293-301.
Norton, J.D.: 1993, The Determination of Theory by Evidence: The Case for Quantum Discontinuity, 1900-1915. Synthese 97: 1–31.
Norton, J.D.: 1994, Science and Certainty. Synthese 99: 3–22.
Norton, J.D.: 1995, Eliminative Induction as a Method of Discovery: How Einstein Discovered General Relativity. In J. Leplin (ed.), The Creation of Ideas in Physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 29–69.
Pais, A.: 1982, Subtle is the Lord. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pais, A.: 1986, Inward Bound. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pais, A.: 1991, Niels Bohr's Times. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Peddie, W.: 1914, On the Structure of the Atom. Philosophical Magazine 27: 257–268.
Planck, M.: 1900, Zur Theorie des Gesetzes der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft 2: 202.
Popper, K.R: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Popper, K.R.: 1963, Conjecture and Refutation. London: Routledge.
Popper, K.R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Popper, K.R.: 1994, Science: Problems, Aims, Responsibilities. In M.A. Notturno (ed.), The Myth of the Framework. London: Routledge, pp. 82–111.
Radnitzky, G.: 1979, Justifying a Theory versus Giving Good Reasons for Preferring a Theory. In G. Radnitzky and G. Anderson (eds.), The Structure and Development of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 213–256.
Riegler, A.: 2001, The Role of Anticipation in Cognition. In D.M. Dubois (ed.), Computing Anticipatory Systems. Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics (in press).
Rutherford, E.: 1962-1965, The Collected Papers of Lord Rutherford of Nelson. Published under the Scientific Direction of Sir James Chadwick. London: George Allen and Unwin, 3 Volumes.
Rutherford, E.: 1902, The Existence of Bodies Smaller than Atoms. Vol.I: 402–409.
Rutherford, E.: 1903, Excited Radioactivity and the Method of its Transmission. Vol. I: 529–548.
Rutherford, E.: 1906, Mass and Velocity of α Particles Expelled from Radium and Actinium. Vol. I: 880–900.
Rutherford, E.: 1911a, The Scattering of α and β Rays and the Structure of the Atom. Vol. II: 212–213.
Rutherford, E.: 1911b, The Scattering of α and β Particles by Matter and the Structure of the Atom. Vol. II: 238–254.
Rutherford, E.: 1913, The Structure of the Atom. Vol. II: 409.
Rutherford, E.: 1914, The Structure of Atoms and Molecules. Vol. II: 471–472.
Rutherford, E.: 1920, Nuclear Constitution of Atoms. Vol. III: 14–38.
Rutherford, E.: 1927, Atomic Nuclei and their Transformations. Vol. III: 164–179.
Schulte, O.: 1999, Means-Ends Epistemology. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 50: 1–31.
Solomon, J.: 1973, The Structure of Matter. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.
Thomson, J.J.: 1903, The Magnetic Properties of Systems of Corpuscles describing Circular Orbits. Philosophical Magazine 6: 673–692.
Thomson, J.J.: 1904, On the Structure of the Atom. Philosophical Magazine 7: 237–265.
Thomson, J.J.: 1906, On the Nature of Corpuscles in an Atom. Philosophical Magazine 11: 769–781.
Thomson, J.J.: 1913, On the Structure of the Atom. Philosophical Magazine 26: 792–799.
van den Broek, A.: 1913, Die Radioelemente, das periodische System und die Konstituenten der Atome. Physikalische Zeitschrift XIV: 32–41.
van Fraassen, B.: 1980, The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
van Fraassen, B.: 1970, Introduction to the Philosophy of Time. New York: Random House.
van Fraassen, B.: 1991, Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon.
Vineberg, S.: 1996, Eliminative Induction and Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 257–266.
Wächtershäuser, G.: 1995, The Uses of Karl Popper. In A. O'Hear (ed.), Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 39. Cambridge: CUP, pp. 177–189.
Weinberg, S.: 1993, The Discovery of Subatomic Particles. London: Penguin Books.
Weinert, F.: 1995, Wrong Theory - Right Experiment: The Significance of the Stern-Gerlach Experiments. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26: 75–86.
Weinert, F.: 1998, Fundamental Physical Constants, Null Experiments and the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Philosophia Naturalis 35: 225–251.
Weinert, F.: 1999, Theories, Models and Constraints. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30: 303–333.
Worrall, J.: 1985, Scientific Discovery and Theory Confirmation. In J.C. Pitt (ed.), Change and Progress in Modern Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 301–331.
Worrall, J.: 1989, Fresnel, Poisson and the White Spot: The Role of Successful Predictions in the Acceptance of Scientific Theories. In D. Gooding, T. Pinch and S. Schaffer (eds.), The Uses of Experiment. Cambridge: CUP, pp. 135–157.
Worrall, J.: 2000, The Scope, Limits and Distinctiveness of the Method of “Deduction from the Phenomena”: Some Lessons from Newton's “Demonstrations” in Optics. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 51: 45–80.
Zimmermann, E.J.: 1968, Time and Quantum Mechanics. In: J.T. Fraser (ed), The Voices of Time. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press, pp. 479–499.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinert, F. The Construction of Atom Models: Eliminative Inductivism and its Relation to Falsificationism. Foundations of Science 5, 491–531 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011315710119
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011315710119