Skip to main content
Log in

Does origin of mycorrhizal fungus or mycorrhizal plant influence effectiveness of the mycorrhizal symbiosis?

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mycorrhizal effectiveness depends on the compatibility between fungus and plant. Therefore, genetic variation in plant and fungal species affect the effectiveness of the symbiosis. The importance of mycorrhizal plant and mycorrhizal fungus origin was investigated in two experiments. In the first experiment, clones (cuttings) of Salix repens L. from three different origins (two coastal dune and one inland ecosystem) were inoculated with three mycorrhizal fungi (the ectomycorrhizal fungi Hebeloma leucosarx and Paxillus involutus; the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae) on two soils with different nutrient availabilities. In the second experiment, homogeneous plant material (one clone of S. repens) was inoculated with four isolates of H. leucosarx, all found in association with S. repens. Plant origin had a large effect on symbiotic effectiveness, assessed by three different criteria (shoot biomass, shoot N-content, shoot P-content). This effect was probably mediated through genetic differences in root parameters. There was also a large plant origin×soil type interaction, with the plants from the nutrient-poor habitat performing better on the poorest soil. The plants from the more nutrient-rich habitat performed better on the relatively rich soil. Effects of plant origin on symbiotic effectiveness were also fungal-species specific. Fungal origin had only a minor effect on symbiotic effectiveness. Studies concerning the ecological significance of mycorrhizal symbiosis should be more explicit about both mycorrhizal plant and fungus origin and compatibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aanen D K and Kuyper Th W 1999 Intercompatiblity tests in the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex in northwestern Europe. Mycologia 91, 783–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander I J and Bigg W L 1981 Light microscopy of ectomycorrhizas using glycol methacrylate. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 77, 425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen G D 1984 Tree roots and the use of soil nutrients. In Nutrition of Plantation Forests. Eds. GD Bowen and KS Nambiar, pp147–179. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundrett M, Bougher N, Dell B, Grove T and Malajczuk N 1996 Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. ACIAR Monograph 32, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess T and Malajczuk N 1989 The effect of ectomycorrhizal fungi on reducing the variation of seedling growth of Eucalyptus globules. Agric. Ecosyst. Environm. 28, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess T, Dell B and Malajczuk N 1994 Variation in mycorrhizal development and Growth stimulation by 20 Pisolithus isolates inoculated on to Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden. New Phytol. 127, 731–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon R K, Garrett H E and Stelzer H E 1987 Growth and ectomycorrhizal development of loblolly pine progenies inoculated with three isolates of Pisolithus tinctorius. Silvae Genetica 36, 240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosskey M G, Linderman R G and Boersma L 1990 Carbon-sink stimulation of photosynthesis in Douglas fir seedlings by some ectomycorrhizae. New Phytol. 115, 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A H 1985 Functional significance of root morphology and root system architechture. In Ecological interactions in soil; plants, microbes and animals. Eds. Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read D J and Usher M B, pp 87–106. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habte M and Byappanahalli M N 1994 Dependency of cassava (Manihot esculenta) on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 4, 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijden E W van der 2000 Mycorrhizal symbioses of Salix repens: Diversity and functional significance. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janos D P 1993 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae of epiphytes. Mycorrhiza 4, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesava Rao P S, Tilak, K V B R and Arunachalam, V 1990 Genetic variation for VA mycorrhizal-dependent phospate mobilization in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Soil 122, 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K R, Shetty K G, Dart P J and Andrews D J 1985 Genotype dependent variation in mycorrhizal colonization and response to inoculation to pearl millet. Plant Soil 86, 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp B R 1997 Inheritance of the ability for ectomycorrhizal colonization of Pinus strobus by Laccaria bicolor. Mycologia 89, 578–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamhamedi MS, Fortin J A, Kope H H and Kropp B R 1990 Genetic variation in ectomycorrhiza formation by Pisolithus arhizus on Pinus banksiana. New Phytol. 115, 689–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin F, Delaruelle C and Ivory M 1998 Genetic variability in intergenic spacers of ribosomal DNA in Pisolithus isolates associated with pine, eucalypts and Afzelia in lowland Kenyan forests. New Phytol. 139, 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigle T P, Miller M H, Evans D G, Fairchild D L and Swan G A 1990 A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 115, 495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercy M A, Shivashankar G and Bagyaraj D J 1990 Mycorrhizal colonization in cowpea is host dependent and heritable. Plant Soil 121, 292–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D D, Domoto P A and Walker C 1985 Colonization and efficacy of different endomycorrhizal fungi with apple seedlings at two phosphorus levels. New Phytol. 100, 393–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina R 1979 Ectomycorrhizal colonization of containerized Douglas-fir and Lodgepole pine seedlings with six isolates of Pisolithus tinctorius. For. Sci. 25, 585–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsham K K, Fitter A H and Watkinson A R 1995 Multifunctionality and biodiversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 407–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman E I 1966 A method of estimating the total length in a root sample. J. Appl. Ecol. 3, 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips J M and Hayman D S 1970 Improved procedure for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 55, 158–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plenchette C, Fortin J A and Furlan V 1983 Growth response of several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P-fertility I. Mycorrhizal dependency under field conditions. Plant Soil 70, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith S E and Read D J 1997 Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith S E, Robson A D and Abbott L K 1992 The involvement of mycorrhizas in assessment of genetically dependent efficiency of nutrient uptake and use. Plant Soil 146, 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R R and Rohlf F J 1995 Biometry, 3rd edition. Freeman and company, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson J, Matthes-Sears U and Peterson R L 1990 Effects of provenance and mycorrhizal fungi on early seedling growth in Picea mariana. Can. J. For. Res. 20, 1739–1745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin C M, Malajczuk N and McComb J A 1989 Ectomycorrhizal formation by micropropagated clones of Eucalyptus marginata inoculated with isolates of Pisolithus tinctorius. New Phytol. 111, 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth W. Van der Heijden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van der Heijden, E.W., Kuyper, T.W. Does origin of mycorrhizal fungus or mycorrhizal plant influence effectiveness of the mycorrhizal symbiosis?. Plant and Soil 230, 161–174 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010377320729

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010377320729

Navigation