Abstract
Because Francis Galton (1822–1911) was a well-connected gentleman scientist with substantial private means, the importance of the role he played in the professionalization of the Victorian life-sciences has been considered anomalous. In contrast to the X-clubbers, he did not seem to have any personal need for there forms his Darwinist colleagues were advocating. Nor for making common cause with individuals haling from social strata clearly inferior to his own. However, in this paper I argue that Galton quite realistically discerned in the reforming endeavors of the1860s, and beyond, the potential for considerably enhancing his own reputation and standing within both the scientific community and the broader Victorian culture. In addition, his professionalizing aspirations, and those of his reformist allies, were fully concordant with the interests, ambitions and perceived opportunities of his elite social group during the Victorian period. Professionalization appealed to gentlemen of Galton's status and financial security as much as it did to the likes of Thomas Huxley and John Tyndall, primarily because it promised to confer on the whole scientific enterprise an unprecedented level of social prestige.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archival Sources
Francis Galton papers at University College London: referred to as GP (UCL).Royal Geographical Society archives: referred to as RGS.
Published Sources
Allen, D. 1985. “The Early Professionals in British Natural History.” In: From Linnaeus to Darwin: Commentary on the History of Biology and Geology, ed. A. C. Wheeler and J. H. Price. London: Society for the History of Natural History.
Annan, N. 1955. “The Intellectual Aristocracy.” In: Studies in Social History: A Tribute to G. M. Trevelyan, ed. J. H. Plumb. London/New York/Toronto: Longmans, Green and Co.
Anon. 1825. Blackwoods Magazine XVIII.
Anon. 1865. Athanaeum, 23 December.
Babbage, C. 1830. Reflections on the Decline of Science in England and on Some of Its Causes. London.
Barton, R. 1998. “ ‘Huxley, Lubbock, and a Half a Dozen Others’: Professionals and Gentlemen in the Formation of the X Club, 1851–1864.” Isis 89: 409–444.
Best, G. 1982. Mid-Victorian Britain. Glasgow: Fontana.
Bibby, C. 1960. T. H. Huxley: Scientist, Humanist and Educator. New York: Horizon.
Bourne, J. M. 1986. Patronage and Society in Nineteenth Century England. London: Edward Arnold.
Burrage, M. and Torstendahl, R. 1990. Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions. London: Sage Publications.
Cannon, S. 1978. Science in Culture. New York: Dawson and Science History Publications.
Carlyle, T., ed. 1893. Past and Present. London.
Coleridge, S. T. (ed.). 1852. On the Constitution of the Church and State. London.
Collins, R. 1990. “Market Closure and the Conflict Theory of the Professions.” In: Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions, ed. M. Burrage and R. Torstendahl. London: SAGE Publications.
Cowan, R. S. 1977. “Nature and Nurture: The Interplay of Biology and Politics in the Work of Francis Galton.” Studies in the History of Biology I: 133–207.
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: J. Murray.
Derby, L. 1875. “Address to Students at Edinburgh,” reported in Nature XIII: 141.
Desmond, A. 1997. Huxley: Evolution's High Priest. London: Michael Joseph.
—— 1994. Huxley: The Devil's Disciple. London: Michael Smith.
Fancher, R. E. 1983. “Biographical Origins of Francis Galton's Psychology.” Isis 74:227–233.
Fichman, M. 1997. “Biology and Politics: Defining the Boundaries.” In: Victorian Science in Context, ed. B. Lightman, pp. 94–118. The University of Chicago Press.
Forrest, D. W. 1974. Francis Galton: The Life and Work of a Victorian Genius. London: Paul Elek.
Galton, F. 1869. Hereditary Genius. London: Macmillan.
—— 1872. “A Statistical Enquiry into the Efficacy of Prayer.” Fortnightly Review 12:125–135.
—— 1873. “Hereditary Improvement.” Fraser's Magazine 7:116–130.
—— 1873b. “On the Causes which Operate to Create Scientific Men.” Fortnightly Review 19:347–351.
—— 1874. English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. London: Macmillan.
—— 1878. “On the Advancement of Geographical Teaching.” Nature 18.
—— 1878–1879. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 8:142–143.
—— 1895. Finger Print Directories. London: Macmillan.
—— 1908. Memories of My Life. London: Methuen.
Goldman, L. 1991. “Statistics and the Science of Society in Early Victorian Britain: An Intellectual Context for the General Register Office.” Social History of Medicine (3 December) 4:415–435.
Hart, J. 1960. “Sir Charles Tevelyan at the Treasury.” EHR LXXV:92–110.
Heyck, T.W. 1982. The Transformation of Intellectual Life in Victorian England. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.
Hilts, V. L. 1975. A Guide to Francis Galton's EnglishMen of Science. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Jarrell, R. A. 1998. “Visionary or Bureaucrat? T. H. Huxley, the Science and Art Department and Science Teaching for the Working Classes.” Annals of Science 55:219–241.
Jones, J. S. 1993. “The Galton Laboratory, University College London.” In: Sir Francis Galton, FRS: The Legacy of His Ideas, ed. M. Keynes. London: Galton Institute.
Kargon, R. H. 1977. Science in Victorian Manchester: Enterprise and Expertise. Manchester University Press.
Kevles, D. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Keynes, M. ed. 1993. Sir Francis Galton, FRS: The Legacy of his ideas. London: The Galton Institute.
Knights, B. 1978. The Idea of the Clerisy in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge University Press.
Mackenzie, D. 1981. Statistics in Britain, 1865–1900: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
MacLeod, R. 1965. “The Alkali Acts Administration, 1863–1884: The Emergence of the Civil Scientist.” Victorian Studies 9:85–112.
—— 1971. “The Support of Victorian Science: The Endowment of Research Movement in Great Britain, 1868–1900.” Minerva 4:197–230.
—— 1976. “Science and the Treasury: Principles, Personalities and Policies, 1870–1885.” In: The Patronage of Science in the Nineteenth Century, ed. L'E Gerard. Leiden: Noordhoff International Publishing.
—— 1977. “Whigs and Savants: Reflections on the Reform Movement in the Royal Society, 1830–1848.” In: Metropolis and Province: Science in British Culture, 1780–1850, ed. I. Inkster and J. Morrell, pp. 55–90. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Means, J. O., ed. 1876. The Prayer Gauge Debate. Boston: Congregational Publishing Co.
Mill, J. S. (ed.). 1904. Principles of Political Economy. London.
Moore, J. 1982. “Charles Darwin lies in Westminster Abbey.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 17: 97–113.
Morrell, J. and Thackray, A. 1981. Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Morrell, J. B. 1990. “Professionalization.” In: Companion to the History of Modern Science, ed. R. C. Olby et al., pp. 980–981. London: Routledge.
Morus, I. R. 1991. “Correlation and Control: William Robert Grove and the Construction of a New Philosophy of Scientific Reform.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4: 589–621.
Morus, I. 1996. “Manufacturing Nature: Science, Technology and Victorian Consumer Culture.” The British Journal for the History of Science 29: 403–435.
Norton, B. 1981. “Psychologists and Class.” In: Biology, Medicine and Society 1840–1940, ed. C. Webster, pp. 289–314. Cambridge University Press.
Pearson, K. 1888. The Ethic of Freethought. London: T. F. Unwin.
—— 1914–1930 (4 vols). The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton. Cambridge University Press.
Perkin, H. 1981. The Origins of Modern English Society 1780–1880. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
Playfair, L. 1885. “Science and Technology as Sources of National Power.” In: Victorian Science: A Self-Portrait from the Presidential Addresses of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, ed. G. Basalla, W. Coleman and R. H. Kargon, pp. 60–87. New York: Anchor Books.
Porter, R. 1978. “Gentlemen and Geology: The Emergence of a Scientific Career, 1660–1920.” Historical Journal 21: 809–836.
Reader, W. J. 1966. Professional Men: The Rise of the Professional Classes in Nineteenth-Century England. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Secord, J. A. 1986. “The Geological Survey of Great Britain as a Research School, 1839– 1855.” History of Science 24: 223–275.
Szreter, S. 1996. Fertility, Class and Gender in Britain 1860–1940. Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, H. B. 1857. The Choice of a Profession: A Concise and Comparative Review of the English Professions. London: Chapman and Hall.
Turner, F. M. 1978. “The Victorian Conflict between Science and religion: A Professional Dimension.” Isis 69: 356–376.
—— 1984. Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rupke, N. 1994. Richard Owen, Victorian Naturalist. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wallace, A. R. 1912. Interview by Frederick Rockell in The Millgate Monthly, August 7: 657–663.
Wiener, M. 1992. English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850–1980. London: Penguin.
Young, M. 1958. The Rise of the Meritocracy, 1870–2033. Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waller, J.C. Gentlemanly Men of Science: Sir Francis Galton and the Professionalization of the British Life-Sciences. Journal of the History of Biology 34, 83–114 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010357526856
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010357526856