Skip to main content
Log in

Gentlemanly Men of Science: Sir Francis Galton and the Professionalization of the British Life-Sciences

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because Francis Galton (1822–1911) was a well-connected gentleman scientist with substantial private means, the importance of the role he played in the professionalization of the Victorian life-sciences has been considered anomalous. In contrast to the X-clubbers, he did not seem to have any personal need for there forms his Darwinist colleagues were advocating. Nor for making common cause with individuals haling from social strata clearly inferior to his own. However, in this paper I argue that Galton quite realistically discerned in the reforming endeavors of the1860s, and beyond, the potential for considerably enhancing his own reputation and standing within both the scientific community and the broader Victorian culture. In addition, his professionalizing aspirations, and those of his reformist allies, were fully concordant with the interests, ambitions and perceived opportunities of his elite social group during the Victorian period. Professionalization appealed to gentlemen of Galton's status and financial security as much as it did to the likes of Thomas Huxley and John Tyndall, primarily because it promised to confer on the whole scientific enterprise an unprecedented level of social prestige.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Archival Sources

  • Francis Galton papers at University College London: referred to as GP (UCL).Royal Geographical Society archives: referred to as RGS.

Published Sources

  • Allen, D. 1985. “The Early Professionals in British Natural History.” In: From Linnaeus to Darwin: Commentary on the History of Biology and Geology, ed. A. C. Wheeler and J. H. Price. London: Society for the History of Natural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan, N. 1955. “The Intellectual Aristocracy.” In: Studies in Social History: A Tribute to G. M. Trevelyan, ed. J. H. Plumb. London/New York/Toronto: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1825. Blackwoods Magazine XVIII.

  • Anon. 1865. Athanaeum, 23 December.

  • Babbage, C. 1830. Reflections on the Decline of Science in England and on Some of Its Causes. London.

  • Barton, R. 1998. “ ‘Huxley, Lubbock, and a Half a Dozen Others’: Professionals and Gentlemen in the Formation of the X Club, 1851–1864.” Isis 89: 409–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, G. 1982. Mid-Victorian Britain. Glasgow: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby, C. 1960. T. H. Huxley: Scientist, Humanist and Educator. New York: Horizon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, J. M. 1986. Patronage and Society in Nineteenth Century England. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrage, M. and Torstendahl, R. 1990. Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, S. 1978. Science in Culture. New York: Dawson and Science History Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, T., ed. 1893. Past and Present. London.

  • Coleridge, S. T. (ed.). 1852. On the Constitution of the Church and State. London.

  • Collins, R. 1990. “Market Closure and the Conflict Theory of the Professions.” In: Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions, ed. M. Burrage and R. Torstendahl. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. 1977. “Nature and Nurture: The Interplay of Biology and Politics in the Work of Francis Galton.” Studies in the History of Biology I: 133–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: J. Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derby, L. 1875. “Address to Students at Edinburgh,” reported in Nature XIII: 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, A. 1997. Huxley: Evolution's High Priest. London: Michael Joseph.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1994. Huxley: The Devil's Disciple. London: Michael Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fancher, R. E. 1983. “Biographical Origins of Francis Galton's Psychology.” Isis 74:227–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichman, M. 1997. “Biology and Politics: Defining the Boundaries.” In: Victorian Science in Context, ed. B. Lightman, pp. 94–118. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Forrest, D. W. 1974. Francis Galton: The Life and Work of a Victorian Genius. London: Paul Elek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. 1869. Hereditary Genius. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1872. “A Statistical Enquiry into the Efficacy of Prayer.” Fortnightly Review 12:125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1873. “Hereditary Improvement.” Fraser's Magazine 7:116–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1873b. “On the Causes which Operate to Create Scientific Men.” Fortnightly Review 19:347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1874. English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. London: Macmillan.

  • —— 1878. “On the Advancement of Geographical Teaching.” Nature 18.

  • —— 1878–1879. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 8:142–143.

  • —— 1895. Finger Print Directories. London: Macmillan.

  • —— 1908. Memories of My Life. London: Methuen.

  • Goldman, L. 1991. “Statistics and the Science of Society in Early Victorian Britain: An Intellectual Context for the General Register Office.” Social History of Medicine (3 December) 4:415–435.

  • Hart, J. 1960. “Sir Charles Tevelyan at the Treasury.” EHR LXXV:92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyck, T.W. 1982. The Transformation of Intellectual Life in Victorian England. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilts, V. L. 1975. A Guide to Francis Galton's EnglishMen of Science. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell, R. A. 1998. “Visionary or Bureaucrat? T. H. Huxley, the Science and Art Department and Science Teaching for the Working Classes.” Annals of Science 55:219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. S. 1993. “The Galton Laboratory, University College London.” In: Sir Francis Galton, FRS: The Legacy of His Ideas, ed. M. Keynes. London: Galton Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargon, R. H. 1977. Science in Victorian Manchester: Enterprise and Expertise. Manchester University Press.

  • Kevles, D. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, M. ed. 1993. Sir Francis Galton, FRS: The Legacy of his ideas. London: The Galton Institute.

  • Knights, B. 1978. The Idea of the Clerisy in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge University Press.

  • Mackenzie, D. 1981. Statistics in Britain, 1865–1900: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, R. 1965. “The Alkali Acts Administration, 1863–1884: The Emergence of the Civil Scientist.” Victorian Studies 9:85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1971. “The Support of Victorian Science: The Endowment of Research Movement in Great Britain, 1868–1900.” Minerva 4:197–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1976. “Science and the Treasury: Principles, Personalities and Policies, 1870–1885.” In: The Patronage of Science in the Nineteenth Century, ed. L'E Gerard. Leiden: Noordhoff International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1977. “Whigs and Savants: Reflections on the Reform Movement in the Royal Society, 1830–1848.” In: Metropolis and Province: Science in British Culture, 1780–1850, ed. I. Inkster and J. Morrell, pp. 55–90. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, J. O., ed. 1876. The Prayer Gauge Debate. Boston: Congregational Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (ed.). 1904. Principles of Political Economy. London.

  • Moore, J. 1982. “Charles Darwin lies in Westminster Abbey.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 17: 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, J. and Thackray, A. 1981. Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, J. B. 1990. “Professionalization.” In: Companion to the History of Modern Science, ed. R. C. Olby et al., pp. 980–981. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morus, I. R. 1991. “Correlation and Control: William Robert Grove and the Construction of a New Philosophy of Scientific Reform.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4: 589–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morus, I. 1996. “Manufacturing Nature: Science, Technology and Victorian Consumer Culture.” The British Journal for the History of Science 29: 403–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. 1981. “Psychologists and Class.” In: Biology, Medicine and Society 1840–1940, ed. C. Webster, pp. 289–314. Cambridge University Press.

  • Pearson, K. 1888. The Ethic of Freethought. London: T. F. Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1914–1930 (4 vols). The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton. Cambridge University Press.

  • Perkin, H. 1981. The Origins of Modern English Society 1780–1880. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Playfair, L. 1885. “Science and Technology as Sources of National Power.” In: Victorian Science: A Self-Portrait from the Presidential Addresses of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, ed. G. Basalla, W. Coleman and R. H. Kargon, pp. 60–87. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. 1978. “Gentlemen and Geology: The Emergence of a Scientific Career, 1660–1920.” Historical Journal 21: 809–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader, W. J. 1966. Professional Men: The Rise of the Professional Classes in Nineteenth-Century England. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, J. A. 1986. “The Geological Survey of Great Britain as a Research School, 1839– 1855.” History of Science 24: 223–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szreter, S. 1996. Fertility, Class and Gender in Britain 1860–1940. Cambridge University Press.

  • Thomson, H. B. 1857. The Choice of a Profession: A Concise and Comparative Review of the English Professions. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. M. 1978. “The Victorian Conflict between Science and religion: A Professional Dimension.” Isis 69: 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1984. Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, N. 1994. Richard Owen, Victorian Naturalist. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. R. 1912. Interview by Frederick Rockell in The Millgate Monthly, August 7: 657–663.

  • Wiener, M. 1992. English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850–1980. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. 1958. The Rise of the Meritocracy, 1870–2033. Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waller, J.C. Gentlemanly Men of Science: Sir Francis Galton and the Professionalization of the British Life-Sciences. Journal of the History of Biology 34, 83–114 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010357526856

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010357526856

Navigation