Skip to main content
Log in

Of firms and farms: agricultural ethics and the problem of compensation

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compensating farmers out of public funds for financiallosses due to adverse weather conditions and animaldiseases is fairly common in most Western countries.This government policy differs from that towardsentrepeneurs in other economic branches. Whatjustifies this differential treatment? In the firstpart of this article, three theories of justice arepresented that offer a general framework for dealingwith problems of compensatory justice. In the secondpart, the possibilities of justifiying differentialtreatment of agriculture within each of these theoriesare explored. It is concluded that compensatorypractices in agriculture require fundamentalrethinking in view of the changing technological,economic, and cultural conditions of agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barry, B., Political Argument. A Reissue with a New Introduction (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck. U., Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Surhkamp, Frankfurt, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Into Their Labours (Pantheon Books, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. and A.Wildavsky, Risk and Culture (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory (Routledge, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, K., Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Introduction (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia (Basic Books, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slicher van Bath, B., De agrarische geschiedenis van West-Europa (Het Spectrum, Utrecht, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenner, E., Why Things Bite Back. Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences (Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B., The Spirit of the Soil: Agriculture and Environmental Ethics (Routledge, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappenburg, M., “Michael Walzer: 'progressief met conservatieve middelen (How to be Progressive with Conservative Means),” in B. van Klink et al. (eds), Gedeelde normen. Gemeenschapsdenken en het recht (Tjeenk Willink, 1993), pp. 59-72.

  • Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice, a Defense of Pluralism and Equality (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vorstenbosch, J. Of firms and farms: agricultural ethics and the problem of compensation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12, 81–98 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009568614022

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009568614022

Navigation