Abstract
Introduction: All countries face theissue of choice in healthcare. Allocation ofhealthcare resources is clearly associated withthe concept of distributive justice and to theexistence of a right to healthcare.Nevertheless, there is still the question ofwhether this right should include all types ofhealthcare services or if it should be limitedto selected types. It follows that choices mustbe made, priorities must be set and thatefficiency of healthcare services should bemaximum.
Objectives and methods: Distributivejustice aims at ensuring that everyone hasaccess to necessary care based on thesubstantive ethical principles of equity andsolidarity. Resource allocation is paramount inpublic policy particularly with regardspharmacoeconomics. The objective of this studyis to determine the leading issues regardingthe marketing and trade of generic medicinesanalysing the reasons why there are hugedisparities between European countries withregards generic drugs acceptance bypractitioners.
Results and conclusion: Distributivejustice aims at ensuring that everyone hasaccess to reasonable care based on the ethicalprinciples of equity and solidarity. However,universality implies always choice in accessand efficiency in delivery. It follows thatresource allocation is instrumental in publicpolicy particularly with regardspharmacoeconomics. The acceptance ofdistributive justice as a new ethical paradigmfor professional ethics implies that as long asthe best interest of the patient is not atstake physicians should regard the use ofgeneric drugs as a valid instrument to promotethe efficiency of the system and therefore as away to facilitate citizen's global access tohealthcare.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buisson, J.P. and Giorgi, D. (1997) La politique du médicament. Paris: Clefs Économie, Editions Montchrestien.
Daniels, N. (1985) Just Health Care. Studies in Philosophy and Health Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dickenson, D. (1999) Can Medical Criteria Settle Priority-Setting Debates? The Need for Ethical Analysis. Health Care Analysis 7, 131–137.
Fryth, L. (1999) Priority Setting and Evidence Based Purchasing, Health Care Analysis 7, 139–151.
Gabe, J., Calnan, M. and Bury, M. (1991) The Sociology of the Health Service. London: Routledge.
Health and Health Care (1996) World Health Organization. Geneva.
Jan, S. (1999) A New Perspective on Economic Analysis in Health Care? Health Care Analysis 7, 99–106.
Loewy, E. (1998) Justice and Health Care Systems:What Would an Ideal Health Care System Look Like. Health Care Analysis 6, 185–192.
Marshall, T. (1999) Health Care in the 21st Century: What Could be the Shape of Things to Come?, Health Care Analysis 7, 79–90.
Mooney, G. (1999) Beyond Health Outcomes: The Benefits of Health Care. Health Care Analysis 6, 99–105.
Myers, M. (1997) New and Improved: The Story of Mass Marketing in America. Academy of Marketing Science Journal. Greenvale.
Olmstead, T. and Zeckhauser, R. (1999) The Menu-Setting Problem and Subsidized Prices: Drug Formulary Illustration, Journal of Health Economics 18, 523–550.
Peppers, D. (1998) Marketing One-To-One. HSM Management, May/June.
Perry, G. (1999) “Generic Medicines: How to Ensure Their Effective Contribution to Health Care”, http://www.egagenerics.com/articles/article.htm
Solomon, R. and Murphy, M. (2000) What is Justice? New York: Oxford University Press.
Towse, A. (1998) The Pros and Cons of a Single “Euro-price” for Drugs. Pharmacoeconomics 13(3), 271–276.
Wikler, D. and Marchand, S. (1998) Macro-Allocation: Dividing the Health Care Budget. In H. Kuhse and P. Singer (Eds.), A Companion to Bioethics, Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Williams, A. (1994) Economics, Society, and Health Care Ethics. In R. Gillon (Ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics. London: John Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rego, G., Brandão, C., Melo, H. et al. Distributive Justice and the Introduction of Generic Medicines. Health Care Analysis 10, 221–229 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016526815976
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016526815976