Abstract
Biotechnology applied to traditional foodanimals raises ethical issues in three distinctcategories. First are a series of issues that arise inthe transformation of pigs, sheep, cattle and otherdomesticated farm animals for purposes that deviatesubstantially from food production, including forxenotransplantation or production of pharmaceuticals.Ethical analysis of these issues must draw upon theresources of medical ethics; categorizing them asagricultural biotechnologies is misleading. The secondseries of issues relate to animal welfare. Althoughone can stipulate a number of different philosophicalfoundations for the ethical assessment of welfare,most either converge on Bernard Rollin‘s ’’principle ofwelfare conservation‘‘ (Rollin, 1995), or devolve intodebates over the ethical significance of animaltelos or species integrity. The principle of welfareconservation prohibits disfunctional geneticengineering of food animals, but would permit alteringanimal‘s biological functions, especially when (as inmaking animals less susceptable to pain or suffering)do so improves an individual animal‘s well being.Objections to precisely this last form of geneticengineering stress telos or species integrity asconstraints on modification of animals, and thisrepresents the third class of ethical issues. Most whohave formulated such arguments have failed to developcoherent positions, but the notion of ’’species being,‘‘derived from the 19th century German tradition,presents a promising way to analyze the basis forresisting the transformation of ’’animal natures.‘‘
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Blatz, Charles, "It Is Morally Permissible to Manipulate the Genome of Domestic Hogs," The Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics4 (1991), 166–176.
Broom, D.M., "Measuring the Effects of Management Methods, Systems, High Production Efficiency and Biotechnology on Farm Animal Welfare," in T.B. Mepham, G.A. Tucker, and J. Wiseman (eds.) Issues in Agricultural Bioethics(Nottingham: University of Notingham Press, 1995), pp. 319–334.
Colwell, Robert K., "Natural and Unnatural History: Biological Diversity and Genetic Engineering," in W.R. Shea and B. Sitter (eds.) Scientists and their Responsibilities (Canton, OH: Watson Publishing International, 1989), pp. 1–40.
Comstock, Gary, "The Case Against BGH," Agriculture and Human Values5 (1988), 36–52.
Fox, Michael W., "Transgenic Animals: Ethical and Animal Welfare Concerns," in P. Wheale and R. McNally (eds.) The Bio-Revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box (London: Pluto Press, 1990), pp. 31–54.
Fox, Michael W., Superpigs and Wondercorn(London: Lyons and Burford, 1992).
Frey, R.G., Interests and Rights: The Case Against Animals(Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1980).
Frey, R.G., Rights, Killing and Suffering(Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishing Co., 1983).
Hoban, Thomas J. and Patricia Kendall, Consumer Attitudes about Food Biotechnology (Raleigh, N.C.: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, 1993).
Holland, Allan, "Artificial Lives: Philosophical Dimensions of Farm Animal Biotechnology," in T.B. Mepham, G.A. Tucker, and J. Wiseman (eds.) Issues in Agricultural Bioethics(Nottingham: University of Nottingham Press, 1995), pp. 293–306.
Kimbrell, Andrew, The Human Body Shop(New York, HarperCollins, 1993).
Krimsky, Sheldon, and Roger Wrubel, Agricultural Biotechnology and the Environment: Science, Policy and Social Issues(Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1996).
Kronfeld, David S., "Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone: Cow Responses Delay Drug Approval and Impact Public Health," in W. Leibhardt (ed.) The Dairy Debate(Davis, CA: University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, 1993).
Linzey, Andrew, "Human and Animal Slavery:ATheologicalCritique of Genetic Engineering," in P. heale and R. McNally (eds.) The Bio-Revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box(London: Pluto Press, 1990), pp. 175–188.
Linzey, Andrew, Animal Theology(Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1995).
Marx, Karl, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. M. Miligan, trns. (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1988).
Mason, Jim and Peter Singer, Animal Factories(New York: Crown Books, 1980).
Mauron, Alex, "Ethics and the Ordinary Molecular Biologist," in W.R. Shea and B. Sitter (eds.) Scientists and Their Responsibilities(Canton, OH: Watson Publishing International, 1989), pp. 249–265.
Meeker, David, "Animal Well-Being and Biotechnology," in J.F. MacDonald (ed.) Animal Biotechnology: Opportunities and Challenges(Ithaca, NY: National Agricultural Biotechnology Council, 1992), pp. 77–84.
Moore, Dale A. and Lawrence J. Hutchinson, "BST and Animal Health," in M. Hallberg (ed.) Bovine Somatotropin and Emerging Issues(Boulder: Westview Press, 1992), pp. 99–132.
Regan, Tom, The Case for Animal Rights(Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1983).
Regan, Tom, "Ethical Vegetarianism and Commercial Animal Farming," in R.A. Wasserstrom (ed.) Today’s Moral Problems, 3rd Edition. (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1985).
Regan, Tom, "The Case for Animal Rights," in P. Singer (ed.) In Defense of Animals(New York: Harper, 1986), pp. 13–26.
Regan, Tom, "Obligations to Animals Are Based on Rights," Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics8 (1995), 171–180.
Rollin, Bernard E., Animal Rights and Human Morality(New York: Prometheus Press, 1981).
Rollin, Bernard E., "The Frankenstein Thing," in J.W. Evans and A. Hollaender (eds.) Genetic Engineering of Animals: An Agricultural Perspective(New York: Plenum Press, 1986), pp. 285–298.
Rollin, Bernard E., The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals(New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Ryder, Richard, "Pigs WillFly," in P. Wheale and R. McNally (eds.) The Bio-Revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box(London: Pluto Press, 1990), pp. 189–194.
Ryder, Richard, "Animal Genetic Engineering and Human Progress," in P. Wheale and R. McNally (eds.) Animal Genetic Engineering: Of Pigs, Oncomice and Men(London: Pluto Press, 1995), pp. 1–16.
Sapontzis, Steve F., "We Should Not Manipulate the Genome of Domestic Hogs," The Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics4 (1991), 177–185.
Singer, Peter, "Famine, Affluence and Morality," Philosophy and Public Affairs1 (1972), 229–243.
Singer, Peter, "All Animals Are Equal: Review of Godlovitch and Harris (eds.), Animals, Men and Morals," New York Review of Books(April 5, 1973).
Singer, Peter, Animal Liberation(New York: Avon Books, 1975).
Singer, Peter, Animal Liberation, 2nd Edition (1995).
Thompson, Paul B., The Ethics of Aid and Trade: U.S. Food Policy, Foreign Competition and the Social Contract(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Verhoog, Henk, "Ethics and genetic engineering of animals," in: A.W. Musschenga et al. (eds.) Morality, Worldview and Law(Van Gorcum, Assen/Maastricht, 1992), pp. 267–278.
Verhoog, Henk, "The Concept of Intrinsic Value and Transgenic Animals," Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics5(2) (1992), 147–160.
Verhoog, Henk, "Biotechnology and Ethics," in T. Brante, S. Fuller, W. Lynch (eds.) Controversial Science(New York: SUNY Press, 1993), pp. 83–106.
Wilmut, I., "Modification of Farm Animals by Genetic Engineering and Immunomodulation," in T.B. Mepham, G.A. Tucker, and J. Wiseman (eds.) Issues in Agricultural Bioethics(Nottingham, Nottingham University Press, 1995), pp. 229–246.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, P.B. Ethics and the Genetic Engineering of Food Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10, 1–23 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007758700818
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007758700818