Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships Between Post-Data Accuracy Measures

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the usual frequentist formulation of testing and interval estimation there is a strong relationship between α-level tests and 1 - α confidence intervals. Such strong relationships do not always persist for post-data, or Bayesian, measures of accuracy of these procedures. We explore the relationship between post-data measures of accuracy of both tests and interval estimates, measures that are derived under a decision-theoretic structure. We find that, in general, there are strong post-data relationships in the one-sided case, and some relationships in the two-sided case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, J. O. and Delampady, M. (1987). Testing precise hypotheses, Statist. Sci., 2, 317–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. O. and Sellke, T. (1987). Testing a point null hypothesis: the irreconciliability of p-values and evidence (with discussion), J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 82, 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Johnstone, I. M., and MacGibbon, K. B. (1981). Variation diminishing transformations: a direct approach to total positivity and its statistical applications, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 76, 824–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G. and Berger, R. L. (1987). Reconciling evidence in the one-sided testing problem (with discussion), J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 82, 106–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, E. I. and Casella, G. (1994). An empirical Bayes confidence report, Statistica Sinica, 4, 617–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutis, C. and Casella, C. (1992). Increasing the confidence in Student's t interval, Ann. Statist., 20, 1501–1513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J. T. and Pemantle, R. (1990). Evaluation of estimators of statistical significance under a class of proper loss functions, Statist. Decisions (to appear).

  • Hwang, J. T., Casella, G., Robert, C., Wells, M. T., and Farrell, R. H. (1992). Estimation of accuracy in testing, Ann. Statist., 20, 490–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, I. M. (1988). On inadmissibility of some unbiased estimates of loss, Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV (eds. J. O. Berger and S. S. Gupta), 361–379, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S. (1968). Total Positivity, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, K. L. and Berger, J. O. (1989a). Estimation of normal means: Frequentist estimation of loss, Ann. Statist., 17, 890–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, K. L. and Berger, J. O. (1989b). Estimated confidence procedures for multivariate normal means, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 23, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, C. R. and Caselia, G. (1993). Improved confidence statements for the usual multivariate normal confidence set, Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics V (eds. J. O. Berger and S. S. Gupta), 351–368, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukhin, A. L. (1988a). Estimated loss and admissible loss estimators, Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV (eds. J. O. Berger and S. S. Gupta), 409–418, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukhin, A. L. (1988b). Loss functions for loss estimation, Ann. Statist., 16, 1262–1269.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Goutis, C., Casella, G. Relationships Between Post-Data Accuracy Measures. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 49, 711–726 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003270426974

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003270426974

Navigation