Abstract
In this analysis I consider Finley's (1984) model of the teacher track assignment process using the 1990–1991 Schools and Staffing Survey, a large national database with a unique measure of teacher course assignments. I test the hypothesis that rather than being random, or based on ascriptive characteristics, teachers are sorted into classrooms based on a combination of legitimate criteria, including seniority, educational credentials, and motivation. I find that this is largely the case, with the exception that low track teachers often have more training in teaching methods than high track teachers. These findings suggest that teacher tracking contributes to two phenomena, institutional resistance to core changes in the structure of student tracking, and the magnification of inequalities in opportunity to learn produced by tracking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, S.J. (1981). Beachside comprehensive: a case study of secondary schooling. London: Cambridge University Press.
Billingsley, B. (1992). Teacher retention/attrition: issues for research. Working Paper, National Center for Education Statistics.
Bryk, A.S., Lee, V.E., &; Holland, P.B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Inequality and access to knowledge. In J. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of research on multicultural education. New York: Macmillan; pp. 465-483.
Ellemers, N., Doosje, J.B., Knippenberg, A.V., &; Wilke, H. (1992). Status protection in high status minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 123-140.
Finley, M.K. (1984). Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school. Sociology of Education, 57, 233-243.
Gamoran, A. &; Berends, M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 415-435.
Gamoran, A. &; Kelly, S. (2003). On what is learned in school to how schools work: learning and teaching in secondary school english classrooms. In M.T. Hallinan, A. Gamoran, W. Kubitschek, &; T. Loveless (Eds.), Stability and Change in American Education: Structure, Processes and Outcomes. Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner Publications.
Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., &; LePore, P.C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 687-715.
Goldhaber, D.D. &; Brewer, D.J. (1999). Teacher licensing and student achievement. In M. Kanstoroom &; C.E. Finn (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
Hargreaves, D.H. (1967). Social relations in a secondary school. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: an organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534.
Jones, J.D., Vanfossen, B.E., &; Ensminger, M.E. (1995). Individual and organizational predictors of high school track placement. Sociology of Education, 68, 287-300.
Lacey, C. (1970). Hightown grammer: the school as a social system. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Lee, J. (1998). Teacher staffing and distribution patterns for 1997 in four Maryland LEA's. Paper presented at the Harvard Conference on Civil Rights and High Stakes K-12 Testing, December 4, 1998.
Lee, V.E., Dedrick, R.F., &; Smith, J.B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers' efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64, 190-208.
Lewis Mumford Center. (2002). Choosing segregation: racial imbalance in American public schools, 1990-2000. Albany, NY: The State University of New York at Albany, Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research.
Lortie, D.C. (1975). School teacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lucas, S.R. (1999). Tracking inequality: stratification and mobility in American schools New York: Teachers College Press.
Metz, M.H. (1978). Classrooms &; corridors: the crisis of authority in desegragated secondary schools. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mickelson, R.A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First-and second-generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 215-252.
Monk, D.H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary math and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125-145.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: how schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequality: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Oakes, J. &; Lipton, M. (1992). Detracking schools: early lessons from the field. Phi Delta Kappan 73, 448-454.
Pallas, A.M., Entwisle, D.R., Alexander, K.L., &; Stluka, F.M. (1994). Ability-group effects: Instructional, social, or institutional? Sociology of Education, 67, 27-46.
Page, R.N. (1991). Lower-track classrooms: a curricular and cultural perspective. New York: Teachers College Press.
Perie, M. &; Baker, D.P. (1997). Job satisfaction among America's teachers: effects of workplace conditions, background characteristics, and teacher compensation. Statistical Analysis report, National Center for Education Statistics.
Raudenbush, S.W., Rowan, B., &; Cheong, Y.F. (1992). Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65, 150-167.
Riehl, C. &; Sipple, J.W. (1996). Making the most of time and talent: secondary school organizational climates, teaching task environments, and teacher commitment. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 873-901.
Rosenbaum, J.E. (1976). Making inequality. New York: Wiley.
Rowan, B., Raudenbush, S., &; Kang, S.J. (1991). Organizational design in high schools: a multilevel analysis. American Journal of Education, 91, 238-266.
Sachdev, I. &; Bourhis, R.Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277-293.
Sachdev, I. &; Bourhis, R.Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
Schwartz, F. (1981). Supporting or subverting learning: peer group patterns in four tracked schools. Anthropology &; Education Quarterly, 12, 99-119.
Siskin, L.S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: academic departments in secondary schools. Washington DC: Flamer Press.
Sørenson, A.B. (1970). Organizational differentiation of student and educational opportunity. Sociology of Education, 43, 355-356.
Talbert, J. (1992). Teacher tracking: exacerbating inequalities in the high school. Revision of a paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 16–20, 1990.
Tajfel, H. &; Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austing &; S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Montery, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Taylor, D.M. &; McKirnan, D.J. (1984). A five-stage model of intergroup-relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 291-300.
Thibaut, J.W. &; Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelly, S. Are Teachers Tracked? On what Basis and with what Consequences. Social Psychology of Education 7, 55–72 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPOE.0000010673.78910.f1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPOE.0000010673.78910.f1