Skip to main content
Log in

Constructivism: Defense or a Continual Critical Appraisal A Response to Gil-Pérez et al.

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This commentary is a critical appraisal of Gil-Pérez et al.'s (2002) conceptualization of constructivism. It is argued that the following aspects of their presentation are problematic: (a) Although the role of controversy is recognized, the authors implicitly subscribe to a Kuhnian perspective of `normal' science; (b) Authors fail to recognize the importance of von Glasersfeld's contribution to the understanding of constructivism in science education; (c) The fact that it is not possible to implement a constructivist pedagogy without a constructivist epistemology has been ignored; and (d) Failure to recognize that the metaphor of the `student as a developing scientist' facilitates teaching strategies as students are confronted with alternative/rival/conflicting ideas. Finally, we have shown that constructivism in science education is going through a process of continual critical appraisals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L. & Lederman, N.G.: 1998, 'The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural', Science Education 82, 417-436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd.-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N.: 2000, 'Improving Science Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature', International Journal of Science Education 22, 665-701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. & Linn, M.: 1991, 'Science Education and Philosophy of Science: Congruence or Contradiction?', International Journal of Science Education 13, 227-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C.A. & Brewer,W.F.: 1993, 'The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction', Review of Educational Research 63, 1-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R.A.: 1990, Restructuring Science Education, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F.: 1986, 'Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching', in M.C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd edn, Macmillan, New York, pp. 119-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. & Welljams-Dorof, A.: 1992, 'Citation Data: Their Use as Qualitative Indicators for Science and Technology Evaluation and Policy-Making', Current Contents 24, 5-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geelan, D.R.: 1997, 'Epistemological Anarchy and the Many Forms of Constructivism', Science & Education 6, 15-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Pérez, D., Guisásola, J., Moreno, A., Cachapuz, A., Pessoa de Carvalho, A.M., Martínez Torregrosa, J., Salinas, J., Valdés, P., González, E., Gené Duch, A., Dumas-Carré, A., Tricárico, H. & Gallego, R.: 2002, 'Defending Constructivism in Science Education', Science & Education 11(6), 557-571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.K. & Swift, D.J.: 1985, 'Towards a Lakatosian Analysis of Piagetian and Alternative Conceptions Research Programs', Science Education 69, 681-696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y.S.: 1989, Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, M.D. & Taylor, P.C.: 1997, 'Von Glasersfeld's Radical Constructivism: A Critical Review', Science & Education 6, 135-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D.: 1985, 'Philosophy of Science, Science and Science Education', Studies in Science Education 12, 25-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D.: 1988, 'Towards a Philosophically More Valid Science Curriculum', Science Education 72, 19-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G.: 1986, The Advancement of Science and its Burdens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E.W.: 2000, 'Constructivism in School Science Education: Powerful Model or the Most Dangerous Intellectual Tendency?', Science & Education 9, 599-610

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., Lawson, A.E., Wollman, W.T., Appel, M., Bernoff, R., Howe, A., Rusch, J.J. & Sullivan, F.: 1977, Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.J.: 1997, 'Research Traditions in Comparative Context: A Philosophical Challenge to Radical Constructivism', Science Education 81, 355-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, R.F.: 1987, 'Genetic Epistemology, Equilibration, and the Rationality of Scientific Change', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18, 339-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, R.F.: 1993, 'Piaget's Epistemic Subject and Science Education: Epistemological vs. Psychological Issues', Science & Education 2, 137-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koulaidis, V. & Ogborn, J.: 1995, 'Science Teachers' Philosophical Assumptions: How Well do we Understand Them?', International Journal of Science Education 17, 273-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of California Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaburÚ, C.E. & Arruda, S.M.: 2002, 'Reflexoes Críticas sobre as Estratégias Instrucionais Construtivistas na Educacao Científica', Revista Brasileira de Encino de Física 24, 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970, 'Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes', in I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 91-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N.G.: 1992, 'Students' and Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Review of the Research', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, 331-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A.E.: 1991, 'Is Piaget's Epistemic Subject Dead?', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 581-591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y.S.: 1989, 'Trouble in the Land: The Paradigm Revolution in the Academic Disciplines', in J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 5, Agathon Press, New York, pp. 57-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmutov, M.: 1975, The Problem Education. Basic Questions of the Theory. Pedagogica, Moscow, Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marín, N. & Benarroch, A.: 1994, 'A Comparative Study of Piagetian and Constructivist Work on Conceptions in Science', International Journal of Science Education 16, 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marín, N., Benarroch, A. & Jiménez Gómez, E.: 2000, 'What is the Relationship Between Social Constructivism and Piagetian Constructivism? An Analysis of the Characteristics of the Ideas within Both Theories', International Journal of Science Education 22, 225-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marín, N., Solano Martínez, I. & Jiménez Gómez, E.: 1999, 'Tirando del Hilo de la Madeja Constructivista', Enseñanza de las Ciencias 17, 479-492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R.: 1992, 'Editorial', Science & Education 1, 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R.: 1993, 'Constructivism and Science Education: Some Epistemological Problems', Journal of Science Education and Technology 2, 359-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R.: 1997, 'Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education', Science & Education 6, 5-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W.F., Almazroa, H. & Clough, M.P.: 1998, 'The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction', Science & Education 7, 511-532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. & Driver, R.: 1987, 'Beyond Processes', Studies in Science Education 14, 33-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, M. & Osborne, J.F.: 1997, 'Placing the History and Philosophy of Science on the Curriculum: A Model for the Development of Pedagogy', Science Education 81, 405-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M.: 1991, 'Role of the Epistemic Subject in Piaget's Genetic Epistemology and its Importance for Science Education', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 569-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M.: 1993, ' “Progressive Problemshifts” Between Different Research Programs in Science Education: A Lakatosian Perspective', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30, 757-765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M.: 1995, 'Chemical Equilibrium and Newton's Third Law of Motion: Ontogeny/Phylogeny Revisited', Interchange 26, 19-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M.: 2001a, 'Constructivismo Social: “Panacea o Problema” ', Interciencia 26, 185-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M.: 2001b, 'Understanding Nature of Science as Progressive Transitions in Heuristic Principles', Science Education 85, 684-690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nola, R.: 1997, 'Constructivism in Science and Science Education: A Philosophical Critique', Science & Education 6, 55-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nola, R.: in press, '“Naked before Reality; Skinless Before the Absolute”: A Critique of the Inaccessibility of Reality Argument in Constructivism', Science & Education.

  • Novak, J.: 1977, 'An Alternative to Piagetian Psychology for Science and Mathematics Education', Science Education 61, 453-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J.: 1979, 'Meaningful Reception Learning as a Basis for Rational Thinking', in A. E. Lawson (ed.), 1980 AETS Yearbook: The Psychology of Teaching for Thinking and Creativity, ERIC, Columbus, OH, pp. 192-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlik, Y.: 2002, 'Editorial: Quality of Science Education', Journal of Science Education 3(2), 60-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J.F.: 1996, 'Beyond Constructivism', Science Education 80, 53-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.C.: 1995, 'The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism', Educational Researcher 24, 5-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1979, 'Foreword', in A.E. Lawson (ed.), 1980 AETS Yearbook: The Psychology of Teaching for Thinking and Creativity, ERIC, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. & Garcia, R.: 1989, Psychogenesis and the History of Science, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozo, J.I., & Gómez Crespo, M.A.: 1998, Aprender y Enseñar Ciencia, Morata, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1981, 'Philosophers and Human Understanding', in A.F. Heath (ed.), Scientific Explanation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 99-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S.: 1986, 'Paradigms and Research Programs in the Study of Teaching: A Contemporary Perspective', in M.C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd edn, Macmillan, New York, pp. 3-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.: 1999, 'What Exactly is Constructivism in Education?', Studies in Science Education 33, 149-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.U. & Scharmann, L.C.: 1999, 'Defining Versus Describing the Nature of Science: A Pragmatic Analysis for Classroom Teachers and Science Educators', Science Education 83, 493-509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K.: 2000, 'Constructivism in Science Education: Moving on', in D.C. Phillips (ed.), Constructivism in Education, National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, pp. 227-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C.-C.: 2002, 'Nested Epistemologies: Science Teachers' Beliefs of Teaching, Learning and Science', International Journal of Science Education 24, 771-783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G.: 1997, 'Atomic and Molecular Structure in Chemical Education: A Critical Analysis from Various Perspectives of Science Education', Journal of Chemical Education 74, 922-925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G.: 2001, 'Editorial: Theories in Science Education at the Threshold of the Third Millenium', Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe 2, 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1989, 'Cognition, Construction of Knowledge and Teaching', Synthese 80, 121-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1990, Personal communication to the first author, April 29.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niaz, M., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Benarroch, A. et al. Constructivism: Defense or a Continual Critical Appraisal A Response to Gil-Pérez et al.. Science & Education 12, 787–797 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCED.0000004555.57519.8f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCED.0000004555.57519.8f

Keywords

Navigation