Abstract
This commentary is a critical appraisal of Gil-Pérez et al.'s (2002) conceptualization of constructivism. It is argued that the following aspects of their presentation are problematic: (a) Although the role of controversy is recognized, the authors implicitly subscribe to a Kuhnian perspective of `normal' science; (b) Authors fail to recognize the importance of von Glasersfeld's contribution to the understanding of constructivism in science education; (c) The fact that it is not possible to implement a constructivist pedagogy without a constructivist epistemology has been ignored; and (d) Failure to recognize that the metaphor of the `student as a developing scientist' facilitates teaching strategies as students are confronted with alternative/rival/conflicting ideas. Finally, we have shown that constructivism in science education is going through a process of continual critical appraisals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L. & Lederman, N.G.: 1998, 'The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural', Science Education 82, 417-436.
Abd.-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N.: 2000, 'Improving Science Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature', International Journal of Science Education 22, 665-701.
Burbules, N. & Linn, M.: 1991, 'Science Education and Philosophy of Science: Congruence or Contradiction?', International Journal of Science Education 13, 227-241.
Chinn, C.A. & Brewer,W.F.: 1993, 'The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction', Review of Educational Research 63, 1-49.
Duschl, R.A.: 1990, Restructuring Science Education, Teachers College Press, New York.
Erickson, F.: 1986, 'Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching', in M.C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd edn, Macmillan, New York, pp. 119-161.
Garfield, E. & Welljams-Dorof, A.: 1992, 'Citation Data: Their Use as Qualitative Indicators for Science and Technology Evaluation and Policy-Making', Current Contents 24, 5-13.
Geelan, D.R.: 1997, 'Epistemological Anarchy and the Many Forms of Constructivism', Science & Education 6, 15-28.
Gil-Pérez, D., Guisásola, J., Moreno, A., Cachapuz, A., Pessoa de Carvalho, A.M., Martínez Torregrosa, J., Salinas, J., Valdés, P., González, E., Gené Duch, A., Dumas-Carré, A., Tricárico, H. & Gallego, R.: 2002, 'Defending Constructivism in Science Education', Science & Education 11(6), 557-571.
Gilbert, J.K. & Swift, D.J.: 1985, 'Towards a Lakatosian Analysis of Piagetian and Alternative Conceptions Research Programs', Science Education 69, 681-696.
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y.S.: 1989, Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Hardy, M.D. & Taylor, P.C.: 1997, 'Von Glasersfeld's Radical Constructivism: A Critical Review', Science & Education 6, 135-150.
Hodson, D.: 1985, 'Philosophy of Science, Science and Science Education', Studies in Science Education 12, 25-57.
Hodson, D.: 1988, 'Towards a Philosophically More Valid Science Curriculum', Science Education 72, 19-40.
Holton, G.: 1986, The Advancement of Science and its Burdens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Jenkins, E.W.: 2000, 'Constructivism in School Science Education: Powerful Model or the Most Dangerous Intellectual Tendency?', Science & Education 9, 599-610
Karplus, R., Lawson, A.E., Wollman, W.T., Appel, M., Bernoff, R., Howe, A., Rusch, J.J. & Sullivan, F.: 1977, Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning, University of California, Berkeley.
Kelly, G.J.: 1997, 'Research Traditions in Comparative Context: A Philosophical Challenge to Radical Constructivism', Science Education 81, 355-375.
Kitchener, R.F.: 1987, 'Genetic Epistemology, Equilibration, and the Rationality of Scientific Change', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18, 339-366.
Kitchener, R.F.: 1993, 'Piaget's Epistemic Subject and Science Education: Epistemological vs. Psychological Issues', Science & Education 2, 137-148.
Koulaidis, V. & Ogborn, J.: 1995, 'Science Teachers' Philosophical Assumptions: How Well do we Understand Them?', International Journal of Science Education 17, 273-283.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of California Press, Chicago.
LaburÚ, C.E. & Arruda, S.M.: 2002, 'Reflexoes Críticas sobre as Estratégias Instrucionais Construtivistas na Educacao Científica', Revista Brasileira de Encino de Física 24, 1-12.
Lakatos, I.: 1970, 'Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes', in I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 91-195.
Lederman, N.G.: 1992, 'Students' and Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Review of the Research', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, 331-359.
Lawson, A.E.: 1991, 'Is Piaget's Epistemic Subject Dead?', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 581-591.
Lincoln, Y.S.: 1989, 'Trouble in the Land: The Paradigm Revolution in the Academic Disciplines', in J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 5, Agathon Press, New York, pp. 57-133.
Mahmutov, M.: 1975, The Problem Education. Basic Questions of the Theory. Pedagogica, Moscow, Russian.
Marín, N. & Benarroch, A.: 1994, 'A Comparative Study of Piagetian and Constructivist Work on Conceptions in Science', International Journal of Science Education 16, 1-15.
Marín, N., Benarroch, A. & Jiménez Gómez, E.: 2000, 'What is the Relationship Between Social Constructivism and Piagetian Constructivism? An Analysis of the Characteristics of the Ideas within Both Theories', International Journal of Science Education 22, 225-238.
Marín, N., Solano Martínez, I. & Jiménez Gómez, E.: 1999, 'Tirando del Hilo de la Madeja Constructivista', Enseñanza de las Ciencias 17, 479-492.
Matthews, M.R.: 1992, 'Editorial', Science & Education 1, 1-9.
Matthews, M.R.: 1993, 'Constructivism and Science Education: Some Epistemological Problems', Journal of Science Education and Technology 2, 359-370.
Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.
Matthews, M.R.: 1997, 'Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education', Science & Education 6, 5-14.
McComas, W.F., Almazroa, H. & Clough, M.P.: 1998, 'The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction', Science & Education 7, 511-532.
Millar, R. & Driver, R.: 1987, 'Beyond Processes', Studies in Science Education 14, 33-62.
Monk, M. & Osborne, J.F.: 1997, 'Placing the History and Philosophy of Science on the Curriculum: A Model for the Development of Pedagogy', Science Education 81, 405-424.
Niaz, M.: 1991, 'Role of the Epistemic Subject in Piaget's Genetic Epistemology and its Importance for Science Education', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 569-580.
Niaz, M.: 1993, ' “Progressive Problemshifts” Between Different Research Programs in Science Education: A Lakatosian Perspective', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30, 757-765.
Niaz, M.: 1995, 'Chemical Equilibrium and Newton's Third Law of Motion: Ontogeny/Phylogeny Revisited', Interchange 26, 19-32.
Niaz, M.: 2001a, 'Constructivismo Social: “Panacea o Problema” ', Interciencia 26, 185-189.
Niaz, M.: 2001b, 'Understanding Nature of Science as Progressive Transitions in Heuristic Principles', Science Education 85, 684-690.
Nola, R.: 1997, 'Constructivism in Science and Science Education: A Philosophical Critique', Science & Education 6, 55-83.
Nola, R.: in press, '“Naked before Reality; Skinless Before the Absolute”: A Critique of the Inaccessibility of Reality Argument in Constructivism', Science & Education.
Novak, J.: 1977, 'An Alternative to Piagetian Psychology for Science and Mathematics Education', Science Education 61, 453-477.
Novak, J.: 1979, 'Meaningful Reception Learning as a Basis for Rational Thinking', in A. E. Lawson (ed.), 1980 AETS Yearbook: The Psychology of Teaching for Thinking and Creativity, ERIC, Columbus, OH, pp. 192-224.
Orlik, Y.: 2002, 'Editorial: Quality of Science Education', Journal of Science Education 3(2), 60-61.
Osborne, J.F.: 1996, 'Beyond Constructivism', Science Education 80, 53-82.
Phillips, D.C.: 1995, 'The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism', Educational Researcher 24, 5-12.
Piaget, J.: 1979, 'Foreword', in A.E. Lawson (ed.), 1980 AETS Yearbook: The Psychology of Teaching for Thinking and Creativity, ERIC, Columbus, OH.
Piaget, J. & Garcia, R.: 1989, Psychogenesis and the History of Science, Columbia University Press, New York.
Pozo, J.I., & Gómez Crespo, M.A.: 1998, Aprender y Enseñar Ciencia, Morata, Madrid.
Putnam, H.: 1981, 'Philosophers and Human Understanding', in A.F. Heath (ed.), Scientific Explanation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 99-120.
Shulman, L.S.: 1986, 'Paradigms and Research Programs in the Study of Teaching: A Contemporary Perspective', in M.C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd edn, Macmillan, New York, pp. 3-36.
Smith, L.: 1999, 'What Exactly is Constructivism in Education?', Studies in Science Education 33, 149-160.
Smith, M.U. & Scharmann, L.C.: 1999, 'Defining Versus Describing the Nature of Science: A Pragmatic Analysis for Classroom Teachers and Science Educators', Science Education 83, 493-509.
Tobin, K.: 2000, 'Constructivism in Science Education: Moving on', in D.C. Phillips (ed.), Constructivism in Education, National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, pp. 227-253.
Tsai, C.-C.: 2002, 'Nested Epistemologies: Science Teachers' Beliefs of Teaching, Learning and Science', International Journal of Science Education 24, 771-783.
Tsaparlis, G.: 1997, 'Atomic and Molecular Structure in Chemical Education: A Critical Analysis from Various Perspectives of Science Education', Journal of Chemical Education 74, 922-925.
Tsaparlis, G.: 2001, 'Editorial: Theories in Science Education at the Threshold of the Third Millenium', Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe 2, 1-4.
Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1989, 'Cognition, Construction of Knowledge and Teaching', Synthese 80, 121-140.
Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1990, Personal communication to the first author, April 29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niaz, M., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Benarroch, A. et al. Constructivism: Defense or a Continual Critical Appraisal A Response to Gil-Pérez et al.. Science & Education 12, 787–797 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCED.0000004555.57519.8f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCED.0000004555.57519.8f