Skip to main content
Log in

The Political Economy of Fiscal Policy: An Experimental Study on the Strategic Use of Deficits

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field data on the strategic use of deficits to limit thebudgetary scope of future governments are inconclusive aboutthe effects of political polarization or a government'sre-election probability on fiscal policy. Therefore, wedesigned a controlled experiment to examine the strategic useof deficits. Using a within-subjects design, we find thatdeficits rise with a higher degree of polarization and a lowerreelection probability. However, in a between-subjects designneither polarization nor reelection probabilities have asystematic effect. We discuss the implications of ourexperimental results for empirical tests of the strategic useof deficits with field data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P. and Bolton, P. (1990). Government debt and the risk of default: A political economic model of the strategic role of debt. In: Dornbusch, R. and Draghi, M. (Eds.), Public debt management: Theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1995). The political economy of budget deficits. IMF Staff Papers 42: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Tabellini, G. (1990). A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt. Review of Economic Studies 57: 403–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borelli, S. and Royed, T.J. (1995). Government 'strength' and budget deficits in advanced democracies. European Journal of Political Research 28: 225–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, M.W. and Tollison, R. (1993). Time inconsistency and fiscal policy: Empirical analysis of U.S. states, 1969–89. Journal of Public Economics 51: 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, J., de and Sturm, J.-E. (1994). Political and institutional determinants of fiscal policy in the European Community. Public Choice 80: 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, J., de and Sturm, J.-E. (1997). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits and of government spending: A reinvestigation. European Journal of Political Economy 13: 739–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, P.-A. and Ohlsson, H. (1991). Political determinants of budget deficits: Coalition effects versus minority effects. European Economic Review 35: 1597–1603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, K.-M., Gardner, R., Keser, C. and von Hagen, J. (1999). Budget processes: Theory and experimental evidence. University of Karlsruhe, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher, U. (1999). Z-tree: Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments.Working paper No. 21, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.

  • Franzese, R.J. Jr. (2001). The political economy of public debt: An empirical examination of the OECD postwar experience. Version presented to the Workshop on Political Economy at the Berglas School of Economics at Tel Aviv University, 30–31 January 2001.

  • Grilli, V., Masciandaro, D. and Tabellini, T. (1991). Political and monetary institutions and public finance policies in the industrial democracies. Economic Policy 13: 341–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G., Kocher, M.G. and Sutter, M. (2002). Government strength, power dispersion in governments and budget deficits in OECD-countries. A voting power approach. Public Choice, forthcoming.

  • Lambertini, L. (2000). Are budget deficits used strategically? UCLA, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. (1995). The disadvantage of tying their hands: On the political economy of policy commitments. Economic Journal 105: 1381–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. and Spolaore, E. (1994). How cynical can an incumbent be? Strategic policy in a model of government spending. Journal of Public Economics 55: 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., Svensson, L.E.O. (1989).Why a stubborn conservative would run a deficit: Policy with time-inconsistent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 325–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2001). An empirical investigation of the strategic use of debt. Journal of Political Economy 109: 570–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, A. and van Winden, F. (2001). Does the wage tax system cause budget deficits?. Public Choice 109: 371–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, D. and Sachs, J. (1989a). Government spending and budget deficits in the industrialized countries. Economic Policy 8: 99–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, D. and Sachs, J. (1989b). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial countries. European Economic Review 33: 903–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. (1995). The politics of the political business cycle. British Journal of Political Science 25: 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G. and Alesina, A. (1990). Voting on the budget deficit. American Economic Review 80: 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkerink, B. and de Haan, J. (2001). Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: New evidence. Public Choice 109: 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutter, M. The Political Economy of Fiscal Policy: An Experimental Study on the Strategic Use of Deficits. Public Choice 116, 313–332 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024842401703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024842401703

Keywords

Navigation