Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Domesticated Birds as a Model for the Genetics of Speciation by Sexual Selection

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In theory, even populations occupying identical environments can diverge in sexually selected traits, as a consequence of different mutational input. I evaluate the potential of this process by comparing the genetics of breeds of domesticated birds to what is known about the genetics of differences among species. Within domesticated species there is a strong correlation of time since domestication with the number of breeds. Descendants of the rock dove, Columba livia (the oldest domesticate) show differences in courtship, vocalizations, body shape, feather ornaments (crests and tails) and colors and color patterns. When nine other domesticated species are included there is a striking hierarchy, with more recent domesticates having a nested subset of these traits: the youngest domesticated species have breeds distinguished only by color. This suggests that selection of new, visible, mutations is driving the process of breed diversification, with mutations that appeal to the breeder happening the most frequently in color. In crosses among related species, color, feather ornaments and many vocalizations and displays show both intermediate dominance and pure dominance. Although the number of loci affecting each of these traits is typically unknown, limited evidence of the genetics of species’ differences suggests that some differences are due to the substitution of single genes of major effect. While neither the genetics of breeds nor the genetics of species provide a perfect model for the genetics of speciation, similarities between the two are sufficiently striking to infer that major, visible, mutations can provide the impetus underlying new directions of sexual selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B.W. & R.J. Daugherty, 1974. Characteristics and reproductive biology of grosbeaks (Pheucticus) in the hybrid zone of South Dakota. Wilson Bull. 86: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Poultry Association, 1998. The American Standard of Perfection. American Poultry Association, Mendon, Mass, 1998 edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avanzi, C.F. & R.D. Crawford, 1990. Mutations and major variants in muscovy ducks, pp. 389–394 in Poultry Breeding and Genetics, edited by R.D. Crawford. Elsevier, Oxford, New York, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M.C. & A.E.M. Baker, 1990. Reproductive behavior of female buntings-isolating mechanisms in a hybridizing pair of species. Evolution 44: 332–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, L.F., 1981. Behavior genetics studies with birds, in Proc. Ist Int. Birds in Captivity Symp. 1978, Seattle, Washington, edited by A.C. Risser, L.F. Baptista, S.R. Wylie & N.B. Gale. International Foundation for the Conservation of Birds, North Hollywood, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, L.F., 1996. Nature and its nurturing in avian vocal development, pp. 39–60 in Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, edited by D. Kroodsma & E. Miller. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, L.F. & M. Abs, 1983. Vocalizations, pp. 309–325 in Physiology and Behaviour of the Pigeon, edited by M. Abs. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, L.F. & H.M. Horblit, 1990. The inheritance and loss of the straw display in estrildid finches. Avicul. Magaz. 96: 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R.B., 1961. Care and Breeding of Budgerigars, Canaries and Foreign Finches. Arco, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binks, G.S., 1997. The Challenge: Breeding Championship Budgerigars. Osprey International, Tanglewood, Virginia Water, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, S.E., M.E. Delany & D.E. Muscarella, 1993. Constant and variable features of avian chromosomes, pp. 39–59 in Manipulation of the Avian Genome, edited by R.J. Etches & A.M. Verrinder Gibbins. CRC Press, Boca raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.A., 1982. Avian genetics, pp. 21–110 in Diseases of Cage and Aviary Birds, edited by M. Petrak. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, N.T. & R. Symanski, 1998. ‘A taste for the beautiful’: latent aesthetic mate preferences for white crests in two species of Australian grassfinches. Am. Nat. 152: 792–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, N.S., 1990. Assortative mating in zebra finch subspecies, Taeniopygia guttata guttata and T. g. castanotis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 330: 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, N.S., 1993. Song, sex and sensitive phases in the behavioural development of birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 82–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R.D., 1990. Origin and history of poultry species, pp. 1–41 in Poultry Breeding and Genetics, edited by R.D. Crawford. Elsevier, Oxford, New York, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danforth, C.H., 1950. Evolution of plumage traits in pheasant hybrids, Phasianus x Chrysolophus. Evolution 4: 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. O. Judd & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., 1872. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. D. Appleton and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S.J.J.F., 1967. Measurements of some Streptopelia doves and their hybrids. Bull. Brit. Ornithol. Club 87: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S.J.J.F., 1970. Patterns of inheritance in the bowing display and associated behavior of some hybrid Streptopelia doves. Behaviour 36: 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.G., 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, H., 1931. Erblichkeitsverhältnisse bei Vögeln, pp. 215–243 in Proc. VIIth Int. Orthnithol. Congress at Amsterdam, 1930, edited by C. de Boer Jr. Den Helder, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139: s125–s153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entrikin, R.K. & L.C. Erway, 1972. A genetic investigation of roller and tumbler pigeons. J. Hered. 63: 351–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehrer, J., 1993. Interspecies-Kreuzungen bei cardueliden Finken und Prachtfinken, pp. 197–216 in Typen des Lebens, Studium Integrale, edited by S. Scherer. Pascal Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C.B. & B.M. Beehler, 1998. The Birds of Paradise: Paradisaeidae. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumihito, A., T. Mikaye, M. Takada, R. Shingu, T. Endo, T. Gojbori, N. Kondo & O. Susumu, 1996. Monophyletic origin and unique dispersal patterns of domestic fowls. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 6792–6795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P.R. & B.R. Grant, 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256: 193–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P.R. & B.R. Grant, 1997a. Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. Am. Nat. 149: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P.R. & B.R. Grant, 1997b. Genetics and the origin of bird species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 7768–7775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, G.R., 1996. Hybrid wood warblers, Dendroica striata x Dendroica castanea (Aves: fringillidae: Tribe Parulini) and the diagnostic predictability of avian hybrid phenotypes. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 109: 373–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A.P., 1958. Bird Hybrids, a Checklist with Bibliography. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulick, J.T., 1890a. Unstable adjustments as affected by isolation. Nature 42: 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulick, J.T., 1890b. Indiscriminate separation under the same environment, a cause of divergence. Nature 42: 369–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttinger, H.R., 1979. The integration of learnt and genetically programmed behaviour: a study of hierarchical organization in songs of canaries, greenfinches and their hybrids. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 49: 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttinger, H.R., 1985. Consequences of domestication on the song structures in the canary. Behaviour 94: 254–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.P., R.E. Moreau & I.C.J. Galbraith, 1966. Polymorphism and parallelism in the African Bush-shrikes of the genus Malaconotus (including Chlorophoneus). Ibis 108: 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansell, J., 1998. The Pigeon in History. Millstream, Bath. Harrison, C.J.O., 1963a. The post-ocular green stripe as a plumage character of the Anatinae. Bull. Brit. Ornithol. Club 83: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, C.J.O., 1963b. The incidence and origin of spotted patterns in the Estrildidae. Ibis 105: 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.M. & J.G. Harrison, 1963a. Comments on a hybrid Red shoveler×Northern shoveler. Bull. Brit. Ornithol. Club 83: 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.M. & J.G. Harrison, 1963b. A gadwall with a white neck ring and a review of plumage variants in wildfowl. Bull. Brit. Ornithol. Club 83: 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.M. & J.G. Harrison, 1971. A back-cross hybrid involving Cinnamon Teal and Northern Shoveller, and remarks on hybrid characters in the group of ‘Blue-winged duck’. Bull. Brit. Ornithol. Club 91: 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A., 1956a. Breeding success in cardueline interspecific pairs, and an examination of the hybrid plumage. J. Genet. 54: 304–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A., 1956b. The behaviour of certain Cardueline F1 interspecies hybrids. Behaviour 9: 202–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, B. & W.R. Rice, 1998. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J.S., 1914. The courtship habits of the Great Crested Grebe (Podiceps cristatus). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 35: 491–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D.E. & T. Price, 1999. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 82: 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa, Y. & A. Pomiankowski, 1994. The evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution 48: 853–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P.A., 1971. Experimental hybridization of the New World quail (Odontophorinae). Auk 88: 264–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. & M. Sorenson, 1999. Phylogeny and biogeography of dabbling ducks (genus: Anas): a comparison of molecular and morphological evidence. Auk 116: 792–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.F. & M. Janiga, 1995. Feral Pigeons. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, R.A., 1996. Multiple displays in animal communication-backup signals and multiple messages. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 351: 329–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenhäuser, D., 1971. Uber Evolutionsvorgänge in der Schwimmentenbalz. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 29: 481–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, J.K., 1980. Mendelian units of inheritance control color preferences in quail chicks (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Science 207: 549–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer, D.C. & R.A. Johnstone, 1995. The evolution of exploitation and honesty in animal communication-a model using artificial neural networks. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 348: 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lade, B.I. & W.H. Thorpe, 1964. Dove songs as innately coded patterns of specific behaviour. Nature 202: 366–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, F.M., 1963. The inheritance of plumage colour in the common duck (Anas platyrhynchos Linné). Bibliographia Genet. 19: 317–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R., 1981a. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721–3725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R., 1981b. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics 99: 541–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, P. & B. Partridge, 1998. Greenfinches. Kingdom Books, Waterlooville, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, W.M., 1963. The Pigeon. Bryan, Columbia, SC, 2nd revised edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, W.M., 1965. Encyclopedia of Pigeon Breeds. T.F.H. Publications, Jersey City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K., 1937. The companion in the bird's world. Auk 54: 245–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K., 1958. The evolution of behavior. Sci. Am. (December) 199: 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, K., 1993. Bright birds and dark habitats illustrate the role of the environment in species' divergence. Nature 362: 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobbs, A.J., 1992. The status of Australian finches in the United Kingdom. Avicul. Magaz. 98: 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T.H., 1911. Notes on two crosses between different races of pigeons. Biol. Bull. 21: 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T.H., 1918. Inheritance of number of feathers of the fantail pigeon. Am. Nat. 52: 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naisbit, R.E., C.D. Jiggins & J. Mallet, 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 268: 1849–1854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolai, J., 1976. Evolutive Neuerungen in der Balz von Haustaubenrassen (Columba livia var domestica) als Ergebnis menschlicher Zuchtwahl. Zeitscrift für Tierpsychologie 40: 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omland, K.E. & S.M. Lanyon, 2000. Reconstructing plumage evolution in orioles (Icterus): repeated convergence and reversal in patterns. Evolution 54: 2119–2133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, H.A. & A.J. Betancourt, 2001. Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics 157: 875–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R.B., 1980. Behavior and songs of hybrid parasitic finches. Auk 97: 118–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.C., 1913. Reciprocal crosses between Reeve's pheasant and the common ring-neck pheasant producing unlike hybrids. Am. Nat. 47: 701–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.C., 1915. Experimental studies of hybridization among ducks and pheasants. J. Exp. Zool. 18: 69–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.C., 1921. A further report of species crosses in birds. Genetics 6: 366–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, T. & G.L. Birch, 1996. Repeated evolution of sexual color dimorphism in passerine birds. Auk 113: 842–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, T. & M. Pavelka, 1996. Evolution of a colour pattern: history, development and selection. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 451–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W.R., 1998. Intergenomic conflict, interlocus anatagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation, pp. 261–270 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D. Howard & S. Berlocher. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W.R. & E.E. Hostert, 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation-what have we learned in 40 years. Evolution 47: 1637–1653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, V., 1997. British Poultry Standards: Complete Specifications and Judging Points of All Standardized Breeds and Varieties of Poultry as Compiled by the Specialist Breed Clubs and Recognized by the Poultry Club of Great Britain. Blackwell Science, Oxford England, Cambridge, Mass, 5th edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, S. & C. Wood, 1998. Three hybrid zones between hermit and Townsend's warblers in Washington and Oregon. Auk 115: 284–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers, A. & K.A. Norris, 1972. Encyclopedia of Aviculture, Vol. 2. Blandford Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers, A., K.A. Norris & C.H. Rogers, 1977. Encyclopedia of Aviculture, Vol. 3. Blandford Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, S. & T. Hilsberg, 1982. Hybridisierung und Verwandtschaftsgrade innerhalb der Anatidae-eine systematische und evolutionstheoretische Betrachtung. J. für Ornithologie 123: 357–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schluter, D., 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 372–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, R.S. & P.A. Johnsgard, 1966. Inheritance of behavioral characters in F2mallard×pintail (Anas platyrhynchos L.×Anas acuta L.) hybrids. Behaviour 27: 259–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, M., 1989. Aviculture in Australia: Keeping and Breeding Aviary Birds. Black Cockatoo Press, Prahran, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, P.B., 1972. Genetic analysis of male mating behaviour in chickens (Gallus domesticus). I. Artificial selection. Anim. Behav. 20: 564–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth Jr., R.J., 1990. Genetics of plumage, skin, and eye pigmentation in chickens, pp. 109–167 in Poultry Breeding and Genetics, edited by R.D. Crawford. Elsevier, Oxford, New York, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.W., 1976. TheWeb of Adaptation. Quadrangle, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somes, R.G., 1990. Mutations and major variants in pheasants, pp. 389–394 in Poultry Breeding and Genetics, edited by R.D. Crawford. Elsevier, Oxford, New York, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sossinka, R., 1982. Domestication in birds, pp. 373–403 in Avian Biology, Vol. 6, edited by D.S. Farner, J.R. King & K.C. Parkes.

  • ten Cate, C. & D. Vos, 1999. Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: a reassessment. Adv. Study Behav. 28: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theron, E., K. Hawkins, E. Bermingham, R.E. Ricklefs & N.I. Mundy, 2001. The molecular basis of an avian plumage polymorphism in the wild: a melanocortin-1-receptor point mutation is perfectly associated with the melanic plumage morph of the bananaquit, Coereba flaveola. Curr. Biol. 11: 550–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamosi, S.M. & D. Schluter, 1999. Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species: evidence from a field experiment. Evolution 53: 874–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vriends, M.M., 1992. The New Canary Handbook. Barron's Educational Series, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, S., R.A. Bradley & L.F. Baptista, 1978. Hybridization in Calypte hummingbirds. Auk 95: 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M.J., 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Quart. Rev. Biol. 58: 155–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.J., 2001. Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K. & E. Curio, 1999. Sexes of a monomorphic species differ in preference for mates with a novel trait. Behav. Ecol. 10: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zann, R.A., 1996. The Zebra Finch. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biology 0116, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA (Phone

    Trevor D. Price

Authors
  1. Trevor D. Price
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, T.D. Domesticated Birds as a Model for the Genetics of Speciation by Sexual Selection. Genetica 116, 311–327 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021248913179

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021248913179

Search

Navigation